|
John Ensign on Social SecurityRepublican Jr Senator (NV) |
Proponents recommend voting YES because:
Perhaps the worst example of wasteful spending is when we take the taxes people pay for Social Security and, instead of saving them, we spend them on other things. Even worse than spending Social Security on other things is we do not count it as debt when we talk about the deficit every year. So using the Social Security money is actually a way to hide even more wasteful spending without counting it as debt. This Amendment would change that.
Opponents recommend voting NO because:
This amendment has a fatal flaw. It leaves the door open for private Social Security accounts by providing participants with the option of "pre-funding of at least some portion of future benefits."
The mission of the Alliance for Retired Americans is to ensure social and economic justice and full civil rights for all citizens so that they may enjoy lives of dignity, personal and family fulfillment and security. The Alliance believes that all older and retired persons have a responsibility to strive to create a society that incorporates these goals and rights and that retirement provides them with opportunities to pursue new and expanded activities with their unions, civic organizations and their communities.
The following ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.
[As part of the Contract with America, within 100 days we pledge to bring to the House Floor the following bill]:
The Senior Citizens Fairness Act:
Raise the Social Security earnings limit, which currently forces seniors out of the workforce; repeal the 1993 tax hikes on Social Security; and provide tax incentives for private long-term care insurance to let older Americans keep more of what they have earned over the years.
| |||
| Other candidates on Social Security: | John Ensign on other issues: | ||
|
NV Gubernatorial: Brian Sandoval NV Senatorial: Dean Heller Harry Reid NV politicians Retiring as of Jan. 2013: AZ:Kyl(R) CT:Lieberman(D) HI:Akaka(D) ND:Conrad(D) NE:Nelson(D) NM:Bingaman(D) TX:Hutchison(R) VA:Webb(D) WI:Kohl(D) |
Senate elections Nov. 2012: AZ:Flake(R) vs.Hackbarth(R) CA:Feinstein(D) vs.Emken(R) vs.Taitz(R) CT:Bysiewicz(R) vs.Murphy(R) vs.Shays(R) DE:Carper(D) vs.O`Donnell(R) FL:Nelson(D) vs.LeMieux(R) vs.Connie Mack(R) HI:Hirono(D) vs.Case(D) IN:Lugar(R) vs.Mourdock(R) vs.Donnelly(D) MA:Brown(R) vs.E.Warren(D) MD:Cardin(D) vs.Wargotz(R) vs.Capps(R) ME:Snowe(D) vs.D`Amboise(R) MI:Stabenow(D) vs.Hekman(R) vs.Konetchy(R) vs.Hoekstra(R) MN:Klobuchar(D) vs.Arwood(R) vs.Hernandez(R) vs.Severson(R) MO:McCaskill(D) vs.Akin(R) vs.Steelman(R) MS:Wicker(D) MT:Tester(D) vs.Rehberg(R) ND:Heitkamp(D) vs.Berg(R) |
NE: NJ:Menendez(D) vs.Diakos(R) vs. NM: NV:Heller(R) vs.Berkley(D) NY:Gillibrand(D) vs.Noren(D) vs.Maragos(R) OH:Brown(D) vs.Pryce(R) vs.Mandel(R) vs. PA:Casey(D) vs.Scaringi(R) RI:Whitehouse(D) vs.Hinckley(R) TN:Corker(R) TX:Cruz(R) vs.Leppert(R) vs. UT:Hatch(R) vs.Ashdown(D) vs. VA:Kaine(D) vs.Allen(R) vs.Radtke(R) vs. VT:Sanders(I) WA:Cantwell(D) vs.Baumgartner(R) WI:Schiess(R) vs.Neumann(R) vs.Thompson(R) vs.Kagen(D) vs.Baldwin(D) vs.Schiess(R) WV:Manchin(D) vs.Raese(R) WY:Barrasso(R) |
Abortion
Budget/Economy Civil Rights Corporations Crime Drugs Education Energy/Oil Environment Families Foreign Policy Free Trade Govt. Reform Gun Control Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Jobs Principles Social Security Tax Reform Technology War/Peace Welfare Other Senators Senate Votes (analysis) Bill Sponsorships Affiliations Policy Reports Group Ratings |
|
Contact info: Fax Number: 202-228-2193 Mailing Address: Senate Office SR-119, Washington, DC 20510 Phone number: (202) 224-6244 | |||