Topics in the News: Gay Rights
Marco Rubio on Abortion
: Mar 14, 2013
I believe in protecting life but I'm not a chauvinist
In order to work together with people that you disagree with, there has to be mutual respect. That means I respect people who disagree with me on certain things, but they have to respect me too.
Just because I believe that states should have the right to define marriage in the traditional way does not make me a bigot.
Just because we believe that life--all human life--is worthy of protection at every stage of its development does not make me a chauvinist.In fact, the people who are actually close minded in American politics are the
people that love to preach about the certainty about science with regards to our climate, but ignore the absolute fact that science has proven that life begins at conception.
Click for Marco Rubio on other issues.
Source: Speech at 2013 Conservative Political Action Conf.
Roseanne Barr on Civil Rights
: Sep 24, 2012
Support same-sex domestic partnership benefits
Q: Do you support or oppose the statement, "Same-sex domestic partnership benefits"?
Q: Strongly Support
Click for Roseanne Barr on other issues.
Source: Email interview on presidential race with OnTheIssues.org
Paul Ryan on Civil Rights
: Aug 11, 2012
Keep DADT; no gay adoption; no need for gay hate crime laws
Paul Ryan has voted to ban same-sex marriage and adoption by gay couples, and he voted against repealing the "don't ask, don't tell" ban on gays serving openly in the military. Mitt Romney's pick matches his views on LGBT rights.Ryan lined up with
Romney on repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" when it came before Congress in 2011. Ryan voted against repealing DADT, and Romney was outspoken in his opposition to repeal. Since then, though, Romney has said reinstating DADT would be unnecessary.
Romney's record on the need for hate crimes laws is unclear. But when the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act passed through the House in 2009, Ryan voted against it.
One area where the two differ is on the Employment Non-
Discrimination Act. Ryan voted in 2007 in favor of the law, which would have prohibited workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation but did not yet include gender identity. Romney was once also in favor of ENDA but changed his mind.
Click for Paul Ryan on other issues.
Source: Lucas Grindley in The Advocate, "VP Matches Mitt Romney"
Virgil Goode on Civil Rights
: May 16, 2012
No same-sex domestic partnership benefits
Q: Do you support same-sex domestic partnership benefits?A: No.
Click for Virgil Goode on other issues.
Source: Email interview on presidential race with OnTheIssues.org
Barack Obama on Civil Rights
: May 9, 2012
Same-sex couples should be allowed to marry
Today, I was asked a direct question and gave a direct answer: I believe that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry.I've always believed that gay and lesbian Americans should be treated fairly and equally. I was reluctant to use the term
marriage because of the very powerful traditions it evokes. And I thought civil union laws that conferred legal rights upon gay and lesbian couples were a solution.
But over the course of several years I've talked to friends and family about this.
I've thought about members of my staff in long-term, committed, same-sex relationships who are raising kids together. Through our efforts to end the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, I've gotten to know some of the gay and lesbian troops who are serving
our country with honor and distinction.
What I've come to realize is that for loving, same-sex couples, the denial of marriage equality means that, in their eyes and the eyes of their children, they are still considered less than full citizens.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2012 Presidential campaign website, barackobama.com, "News"
Barack Obama on Civil Rights
: May 9, 2012
No federal laws should hinder state-based same-sex marriage
I decided it was time to affirm my personal belief that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry. I respect the beliefs of others, and the right of religious institutions to act in accordance with their own doctrines.
But I believe that in the eyes of the law, all Americans should be treated equally. And where states enact same-sex marriage, no federal act should invalidate them.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2012 Presidential campaign website, barackobama.com, "News"
Joe Biden on Civil Rights
: May 7, 2012
I'm "absolutely comfortable" with same-sex marriage
Joe Biden became the highest-ranking government official to back same-sex marriage on Sunday, telling Meet the Press he was "absolutely comfortable" with the issue. Obama has appeared reluctant to take up the issue in an election year but has said his
views are "evolving" on the subject.The comments by Biden, and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan's support of same-sex marriage, opened up speculation that the White House is moving towards a new position of support for gay marriage, beyond its
already stated backing for civil unions. But Obama's main political strategist played down the prospect of an imminent shift. In a conference call with reporters on Monday, he insisted that Biden's comments are "entirely consistent with the president's
position, which is that couples who are married, whether they are gay or heterosexual couples are entitled to the very same liberties. When people are married, we ought to recognize those marriages and afford them the rights to which they are entitled."
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Adam Gabbatt & Ewen MacAskill in The Guardian (UK)
Ron Paul on Jobs
: Mar 2, 2012
Ron Paul side-by-side against Gingrich, Romney & Santorum
Q: Ron Paul is the odd man out from the other three GOP frontrunners on foreign policy, the PATRIOT Act , the death penalty, and gay rights--but what happens with that long list of disagreements when talking about economic policy?
A: No, Paul is not the odd man out on economic policy. He agrees with the other three GOP frontrunners on just about all of the policy issues below, from corporate policy to union policy:
Romney/Paul/Santorum/Gingrich side-by-side on
Economic Issues
- Corporation Policy
- Wall Street Reform
- Automaker Bailout
- Financial Bailout
- Economic Stimulus
- Mortgage Crisis
- National Debt
- Balanced Budget
- Campaign Finance Reform
-
Growth of Government
- Union Policy
- Unemployment
- Social Security Privatization
- Death Tax
- Income Tax
Click for Ron Paul on other issues.
Source: Paperback: Romney/Paul/Santorum/Gingrich side-by-side
Rocky Anderson on Civil Rights
: Feb 23, 2012
Same-sex couples should be allowed to marry legally
Q: When you think about the rights of same-sex couples, which of the following is closest to your personal opinion?A:
Anderson chose "Same-sex couples should be allowed to marry legally, with all the same rights as traditional marriages" rather than:- Same-sex couples should not be allowed to marry or form any kind of civil union
-
Same-sex couples should be allowed to form civil unions
Anderson adds, "I unequivocally support marriage equality, since my congressional race in 1996.
My support for marriage equality was the core of my opponent's campaign against me. I was named by the Human Rights campaign as one of the top straight GLBT advocates in the country."
Click for Rocky Anderson on other issues.
Source: AmericansElect Questionnaire with OnTheIssues.org
Rocky Anderson on Civil Rights
: Feb 10, 2012
Same-sex domestic partnership benefits
Q: Do you support or oppose the statement, "Same-sex domestic partnership benefits"?
A: Strongly Support
Click for Rocky Anderson on other issues.
Source: Email interview on presidential race with OnTheIssues.org
Mitt Romney on Civil Rights
: Jan 17, 2012
1994: "I'll be better than Ted Kennedy" on gay rights
Romney's willingness to embrace socially moderate, even liberal, positions--Romney himself preferred the term "socially innovative"--made him an attractive candidate for groups such as the Log Cabin Republicans, a grassroots GOP gay and lesbian
organization. In 1994, as Romney was seeking the group's endorsement, he sat down with Richard Tafel, the group's founder, and received a primer on gay rights issues. Romney was deeply engaged, asked probing questions, and noted that he had gay employees
at Bain. "I'd met with businessmen and politicians, and this felt like a business meeting. It felt much more pragmatic," Tafel said. Romney's approach was "What do I need to do here? How do I get this done?" One Massachusetts Republican who has known
Romney for years summed up his approach this way: "In Mitt's mind, it doesn't matter what my positions are. I'm someone who solves problems." "I'm with you on this stuff," Tafel recalled Romney saying. "I'll be better than Ted Kennedy."
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: The Real Romney, by Kranish & Helman, p,181-182
Mitt Romney on Civil Rights
: Jan 17, 2012
2002: domestic partnership benefits instead of civil unions
The political landscape had shifted following Vermont's pioneering decision in 2000 to legalize civil unions. The decision spooked gay marriage opponents in Massachusetts, who organized a push for a constitutional amendment restricting marriage to
heterosexual unions. But Romney said he did not support the proposed ban.Romney did not support same-sex marriage, declaring in a 2002 questionnaire for "Bay Windows,"
New England's leading gay and lesbian newspaper, "I believe that marriage is a union between a man and a woman." He also said he opposed civil unions, believing they were too close to marriage. But at the same time, he was assuring
gays and lesbians--publicly and privately--that he would not crusade against them. Plus he was voicing support for domestic partner benefits that sounded an awful lot like civil unions.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: The Real Romney, by Kranish & Helman, p.230
Ron Paul on Welfare & Poverty
: Jan 8, 2012
Entitlements are not rights; only big guys get entitlements
Q: Many Americans believe that health care is a right. What services are all Americans entitled to expect to get from government? PAUL: Entitlements are not rights. Rights mean you have a right to your life and you have a right to your liberty. I, in
a way, don't like to use terms [like] gay rights, women's rights, minority rights, religious rights. There's only one type of right, it's your right to your liberty. It's caused divisiveness when we see people in groups because, for too long, we punished
groups, so the answer then was let's relieve them by giving them affirmative action. I think both are wrong. If you think in terms of individuals and protect every single individual, no, they're not entitled. One group isn't entitled to take something
from somebody else. There's a lot of good intention to help poor people. But guess who gets the entitlements in Washington? The big guys get them, the rich people. They run the entitlement system, the military industrial complex, the banking system.
Click for Ron Paul on other issues.
Source: Meet the Press 2012 GOP New Hampshire debate
Andre Barnett on Civil Rights
: Jan 2, 2012
Opposes same-sex domestic partnership benefits
Q: Do you agree or disagree with the statement, "Same-sex domestic partnership benefits"?
A: Disagree.
Click for Andre Barnett on other issues.
Source: Email interview on presidential race with OnTheIssues.org
Jill Stein on Civil Rights
: Dec 21, 2011
First pro-gay-marriage candidate in first gay marriage state
Q: In your 2001 gubernatorial run you supported same-sex marriage in Massachusetts. Are you still for same-sex marriage nationally? A: Yes; we're proud that we were the first gubernatorial campaign in that race to support same-sex marriage, in the
first state to legalize same-sex marriage.
Q: I recall that Robert Reich supported same-sex marriage early in that race.
A: Yes, but we were earlier. Reich came out initially for civil unions. He did later support gay marriage, but after our campaign
Click for Jill Stein on other issues.
Source: 2011 AmericansElect interview questionnaire with Jill Stein
Mitt Romney on Civil Rights
: Nov 22, 2011
2003: Worked with cities to prepare for gay marriages
In May 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court rules that same-sex marriage was constitutional in the Commonwealth; Romney was caught flat-footed. At first he accused the SJC of legislating from the bench, although it was quite clear the SJC had
left the legislative component to the legislature. When the legislature dithered over how best to respond, Romney began to make plans to implement the law. Even though he had a number of tactical and legal maneuvers available, he let it be known that he
would neither attempt to circumvent nor obstruct the application of lawful court orders. To do so would violate one of the thirteen Articles of Mormon Faith: "We believe...in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law." He quietly began working with the c
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: Mitt Romney: An Inside Look, by R.B. Scott, p.111-112
Mitt Romney on Civil Rights
: Nov 22, 2011
1993: Denied ever calling homosexuality "perverse"
Just a few weeks after he announced his Senate candidacy in '93, a young member of one of the student wards in Cambridge vividly remembered that a month earlier, Mitt had called homosexuals "perverse." Romney, whose recently announced positions
on gay rights were considered progressive for the time, angrily denied he'd ever uttered the word, but other sources, including a local leader of the church, confirmed the accuracy of the young man's memory.The damage had been done.
Romney's adamant denial and his subsequent dismissive treatment of some Mormon liberals provoked reactions that, in short order, led to the formation of the somewhat ad hoc, but passionately dogged,
Mormon anti-Romney advocacy groups that badgered him relentlessly throughout the 1994 campaign.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: An Inside Look, by R.B.Scott, p. 59
Mitt Romney on Civil Rights
: Mar 2, 2010
Marriage is not just quaint custom; recognize critical role
Proponents of same-sex marriage have attempted to characterize its opponents as being universally antigay. That has sometimes been an effective campaign tactic, but it is untrue. And because most Americans know it is untrue, same-sex marriage has
repeatedly been rejected by voters. For me and for many others, opposition to same-sex marriage stems from the strong conviction that the ideal setting in which to raise a child is in a home with both a mother and a father. Regardless of whether one's
opposition to same-sex marriage is rooted in religious beliefs or social considerations, the marriage relationship has been the cornerstone of the institution of family since the beginning of time. Marriage is not just a quaint social custom. It is
critical for the well-being of our children and therefore fundamental to the future strength of the nation. It's time for us to recognize its critical role and finally act to preserve it as the institution that nurtures and protects our next generation.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: No Apology, by Mitt Romney, p.269
Sarah Palin on Civil Rights
: Nov 17, 2009
Respected court ruling allowing same-sex state benefits
I had been in office two weeks when the Alaska Supreme Court required us to offer health benefits to the same-sex partners of state employees.I support the traditional definition of marriage. One man & one woman to make a marriage. And I don't support
efforts that can lead to changing that definition.
But on this issue in Alaska, the court was the lawful interpreter of the state Constitution. The promise I had made when being sworn into office was to uphold the Constitution. That meant I would be
bound by the judiciary's ruling. So when conservatives in the legislature passed a bill that would prohibit state benefits for same-sex couples, the court ruled it unconstitutional, so I vetoed it.
A few angry lawmakers visited my office, outraged that
I hadn't bucked the court. A couple of them said I should have been willing to go to jail over the issue.
And if the people want to amend the Constitution via referendum, I told the lawmakers, they have the right to battle it out and do so.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Going Rogue, by Sarah Palin, p.143
Mitt Romney on Abortion
: Aug 4, 2009
OpEd: baroque circumlocutions on evolving abortion stance
Romney had taken positions in Massachusetts that were anathema to the conservative base, particularly on abortion and gay rights. Running against Ted Kennedy in 1994, Romney had declared himself a supporter of a woman's right to
choose on abortion, and claimed he would do more for gay rights than Kennedy. Then he changed positions on abortion. A year before he launched his presidential candidacy, he tried to explain his evolving views to several Washington Post reporters.
[One columnist] who had grilled him that day later described his explanations as "baroque circumlocutions."The McCain campaign, sensing an opportunity to stop Romney even before he could get launched, stoked the story line that
Romney was a flip-flopper. A video of Romney from 1994 surfaced that showed him defending abortion rights. The nascent Romney campaign was overwhelmed by the barrage of criticism.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: The Battle for America 2008, by Balz & Johnson, p.239
Mitt Romney on Principles & Values
: Aug 4, 2009
2008: Cast himself as a doer, not just a dreamer
Romney began the race with a balance sheet that included liabilities almost as great as his assets. He was a one-term governor from one of the most liberal states in the nation. He was a devout Mormon in a party whose evangelical wing viewed the
Mormon religion with something between skepticism and hostility. Romney had taken positions in Massachusetts that were anathema to the conservative base, particularly on abortion and gay rights.
Romney cast himself as a doer, not just a dreamer, who had managed large enterprises, and as an outsider who would shake up the capital. "I do not believe Washington can be transformed from within by a lifelong politician,"
he said. "There have been too many deals, too many favors, too many entanglements, and too little real-world experience managing, guiding, leading." If Republicans wanted competence, he would be that candidate.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: The Battle for America 2008, by Balz & Johnson, p.239
Sarah Palin on Civil Rights
: Oct 2, 2008
Non-support of anything but traditional marriage
Q: Do you support, as they do in Alaska, granting same-sex benefits to couples?BIDEN: Absolutely positively. Absolutely no distinction from a legal standpoint between a same-sex and a heterosexual couple. That’s only fair.
Q: Would you support
expanding that beyond Alaska to the rest of the nation?
PALIN: Well, not if it goes closer and closer towards redefining the traditional definition of marriage between one man and one woman. And unfortunately that’s sometimes where those steps lead.
I don’t support defining marriage as anything but between one man and one woman, and I think through nuances we can go round and round about what that actually means. I’m being as straight up with Americans as I can in my non- support for anything but a
traditional definition of marriage.
Q: Let’s try to avoid nuance. Do you support gay marriage?
BIDEN: No. We do not support that. That is a decision to be able to be left to faiths.
PALIN: My answer is the same as his and it is that I do not.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Vice Presidential debate against Sen. Joe Biden
Joe Biden on Civil Rights
: Oct 2, 2008
No on gay marriage; yes on equal treatment
Q: Do you support, as they do in Alaska, granting same-sex benefits to couples?BIDEN: Absolutely positively. Absolutely no distinction from a legal standpoint between a same-sex and a heterosexual couple. Same-sex couples should be able to have
visitation rights in the hospitals, joint ownership of property, life insurance policies, etc. That’s only fair.
Q: Governor, would you support expanding that beyond Alaska to the rest of the nation?
PALIN: Well, not if it goes closer and closer
towards redefining the traditional definition of marriage between one man and one woman.
Q: Let’s try to avoid nuance. Do you support gay marriage?
BIDEN: No. Barack Obama nor I support redefining from a civil side what constitutes marriage.
We do not support that. That is basically the decision to be left to faiths and people who practice their faiths the determination what you call it.
PALIN: My answer is the same as his and it is that I do not.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: 2008 Vice Presidential debate against Gov. Sarah Palin
Sarah Palin on Abortion
: Aug 30, 2008
Opposes embryonic stem cell research
According to an October 2006 profile in the Anchorage Daily News, Palin opposes stem cell research, physician-assisted suicide, and state health benefits for same-sex partners.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Boston Globe, “A valentine to evangelical base”, p. A12
Sarah Palin on Civil Rights
: Aug 29, 2008
Vetoed bill denying benefits to gays, as unconstitutional
Ms. Palin said she supported Alaska’s decision to amend its Constitution to ban same-sex marriage. But she used her first veto as governor to block a bill that would have prohibited the state from granting health benefits to same-sex partners of
public employees. Ms. Palin said she vetoed the bill because it was unconstitutional, but raised the possibility of amending the state Constitution so the ban could pass muster.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: New York Times, pp. A1 & A10, “An Outsider Who Charms”
Barack Obama on Civil Rights
: Jul 2, 2008
Opposes CA Prop. 8, one-man-one-woman marriage
Presidential candidates can command instant national attention when they want it. But John McCain and Barack Obama each took a hushed approach to letting the world know where they stand on the California ballot measure to ban same-sex marriage.
The muted announcements--McCain supports the proposed ban, Obama opposes it--will have little if any bearing on the presidential contest in California, but the ramifications are serious elsewhere.
Obama first announced his opposition to the measure
only in response to media inquiries. He said the nation should recognize lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans “with full equality under the law.”
Obama called the ballot measure “divisive and discriminatory” and concluded by
congratulating “all of you who have shown your love for each other by getting married these last few weeks.” Left unstated was that Obama has declined to endorse gay marriage, saying that civil unions would suffice to protect partners’ rights.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: By Michael Finnegan and Cathleen Decker, Los Angeles Times
Mitt Romney on Civil Rights
: Feb 5, 2008
GovWatch: 1994: Favored gays serving openly in military
Top Romney Flip Flops: #2. Gay Rights:In a 1994 letter to the Log Cabin Republicans, who advocate gay rights,
Romney said he was in favor of “gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly” in the military. He now says it would be a mistake to interfere with the “don’t ask, don’t tell policy.”
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: GovWatch on 2008 campaign: “Top Ten Flip-Flops”
Ron Paul on Civil Rights
: Sep 17, 2007
No need for Marriage Amendment; DOMA is enough
Q: Will you support a federal marriage amendment, and what else will you do to protect the institution of marriage?A: I think the best thing the president can do is set a good example, and I would start with having been married
50 years, and proud of it. I believe, also, that I do not see any need for another constitutional amendment. I think we have fallen into a trap that we have to redefine marriage. We’re on the defensive, defining marriage. Why don’t you just tell them
to look it up in the dictionary, to find out what a marriage says? For federal legal purposes, the Defense of Marriage Act is proper. It takes care of all the problems. If you have to have rules and regulations, put it at the state level, like the
Constitution says. But you know, marriage only came about and getting licenses only came about in recent history for health reasons. Marriage is a church function. It’s not a state function. I don’t think you need a license to get married.
Click for Ron Paul on other issues.
Source: 2007 GOP Values Voter Presidential Debate
Ron Paul on Civil Rights
: Sep 17, 2007
First Amendment was written for controversial speech
Q: Many libertarians oppose laws against same-sex marriages, prostitution and illegal drugs. What is your view?A: If you believe in liberty, you are a libertarian. The best libertarians we’ve ever had in this country were our Founding Fathers.
They believed in civil liberties, economic liberties, and they believed in a non-intervention foreign policy.
But, the inference here about marriage, and prostitution, and drugs--they never addressed it. There’s no constitutional authority, to deal
with those problems. But there’s no prohibitions for the states to do it.
If you’re willing to use the strong arm of government to regulate things that are negative that you don’t like and you find abhorrent, you set the stage for regulating your
religion, your schools, and everything else.
The First Amendment wasn’t written to protect non-controversial speech. It was written to protect controversial speech, so we don’t lose our right to go to church and run our schools. This is key!
Click for Ron Paul on other issues.
Source: 2007 GOP Values Voter Presidential Debate
Barack Obama on Civil Rights
: Sep 6, 2007
Ok to expose 6-year-olds to gay couples; they know already
Q: Last year some parents of second graders in Lexington, Massachusetts, were outraged to learn their children’s teacher had read a story about same-sex marriage, about a prince who marries another prince.
Would you be comfortable having this story read to your children as part of their school curriculum?A: My 9-year-old and my 6-year-old are already aware that there are same-sex couples. And my wife and I have talked about it. And one of the things
I want to communicate to my children is not to be afraid of people who are different, and because there have been times in our history where I was considered different. And one of the things
I think the next president has to do is to stop fanning people’s fears.
Q: Have you sat down with your daughters to talk about same-sex marriage?
A: My wife has.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2007 Democratic primary debate at Dartmouth College
Hillary Clinton on Civil Rights
: Sep 6, 2007
Telling kids about gay couples is parental discretion
Q: Last year some parents of second graders in Lexington, Massachusetts, were outraged to learn their children’s teacher had read a story about same-sex marriage, about a prince who marries another prince. Would you be comfortable having this story read
to your children as part of their school curriculum?A: With respect to your individual children, that is such a matter of parental discretion. I think that obviously it is better to try to work with your children, to help your children the many
differences that are in the world and to really respect other people and the choices that other people make, and that goes far beyond sexual orientation. So I think that this issue of gays and lesbians and their rights will remain an important one in
our country. Tomorrow we’re going to vote on the hate crimes bill. We haven’t been able to get it passed, and it is an important measure to send a message that we stand against hatred and divisiveness.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2007 Democratic primary debate at Dartmouth College
Mitt Romney on Civil Rights
: Aug 31, 2007
1994: Gays ok in Boy Scouts
Here’s a brief review of Romney’s public record on gay rights in his 1994 campaign against Senator Edward Kennedy.- Supports federal legislation to prohibit discrimination in the workplace against homosexuals.
- Supports President
Clinton’s “don’t ask/don’t tell” policy for gays in the military.
- Says homosexuals should be allowed to participate in the Boy Scouts.
- Endorsed by the Massachusetts Log Cabin Republicans.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: The Man, His Values, & His Vision, p. 58-59
Mitt Romney on Civil Rights
: Aug 31, 2007
2006: Marriage: I agree with 3000 years of recorded history
On December 14, 2006, Romney said in a National Review Online interview: “Like the vast majority of Americans, I’ve opposed same-sex marriage, but I’ve also opposed unjust discrimination against anyone, for racial or religious reasons, or for sexual
preference. Americans are a tolerant, generous, and kind people. We all oppose bigotry and disparagement. But the debate over same-sex marriage is not a debate over tolerance.
It is a debate about the purpose of the institution of marriage and it is a debate about activist judges who make up the law rather than interpret the law.“I agree with 3000 years of recorded history. I believe marriage is a sacred institution between
a man and a woman and I have been rock solid in my support of traditional marriage. Marriage is first and foremost about nurturing and developing children. It’s unfortunate that those who choose to defend the institution of marriage are often demonized.”
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: The Man, His Values, & His Vision, p. 60
Barack Obama on Civil Rights
: Aug 9, 2007
Legal rights for gays are conferred by state, not by church
Q: You have said in previous debates that it is up to individual religious denominations to decide whether or not to recognize same-sex marriage. What place does the church have in government-sanctioned civil marriages? A:
It is my strong belief that the government has to treat all citizens equally. I don’t think that the church should be making these determinations when it comes to legal rights conferred by the state.
I do think that individual denominations have the right to make their own decisions as to whether they recognize same sex couples. My denomination, United Church of Christ, does.
Other denominations may make a decision, and obviously, part of keeping a separation of churches and state is also to make sure that churches have the right to exercise their freedom of religion.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues
Barack Obama on Civil Rights
: Aug 9, 2007
Gay marriage is less important that equal gay rights
Q: On the grounds of civil marriage, can you see to our community where [your stance of separating gay rights from the word “marriage”] comes across as sounding like “separate but equal”?A: Look, when my parents got married in 1961, it would have been
illegal for them to be married in a number of states in the South. So obviously, this is something that I understand intimately, it’s something that I care about. But if I were advising the civil rights movement back in 1961 about its approach to civil
rights, I would have probably said it’s less important that we focus on an anti-miscegenation law than we focus on a voting rights law and a non-discrimination and employment law and all the legal rights that are conferred by the state.
Now, it’s not for me to suggest that you shouldn’t be troubled by these issues. But my job as president is going to be to make sure that the legal rights that have consequences on a day to day basis for loving same sex couples all across the country.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues
Hillary Clinton on Civil Rights
: Aug 9, 2007
Positive about civil unions, with full equality of benefits
Q: What is at the heart of your opposition to same-sex marriage? A: Well, I prefer to think of it as being very positive about civil unions. You know, it’s a personal position. How we get to full equality is the debate we’re having, & I am absolutely
in favor of civil unions with full equality of benefits, rights, and privileges. I want to proceed with equalizing federal benefits.
And I’ve also been a very strong supporter of letting the states maintain their jurisdiction over marriage.
I want to repeal Section 3 of DOMA, which stands in the way of the extension of benefits to people in committed, same-sex relationships. I will be very strongly in favor of doing that as president.
I don’t know that we could have defeated the Federal
Marriage Amendment if we had not had DOMA. I mean, that is something that, you know, has provided a great protection against what was clearly the Republican strategy, to just cynically use marriage as a political tool.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues
Barack Obama on Jobs
: Aug 9, 2007
Chief co-sponsor of IL ENDA, against gay job discrimination
Q: A recent poll of young Americans show that 44% favor same-sex marriage compared to 28% of the older public. Now, you’re running as a candidate of change. But how can you run as a candidate of change when your stance on same-sex marriage is decidedly
old school?A: Oh, come on, now. There’s a reason why I was here first. It’s because I’ve got a track record of working on these issues. If people are interested at the federal level, they can look at who was the chief co-sponsor of
Illinois’ version of ENDA [the Employment Non-Discrimination Acts, focusing on discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation], which we passed. If people are interested in my stance on these issues, I’ve got a track record of working with the
LGBT community. What I have focused on and what I will continue to focus on is making sure that the rights that are provided by the federal government and the state governments and local governments are ones that are provided to everybody.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues
Barack Obama on Civil Rights
: Jul 23, 2007
Let each denominations decide on recognizing gay marriage
Q: The laws banning interracial marriage were ruled unconstitutional in 1967. What is the difference between a ban on interracial marriage and a ban on gay marriage?A: We’ve got to make sure that everybody is equal under the law.
And the civil unions that I proposed would be equivalent in terms of making sure that all the rights that are conferred by the state are equal for same-sex couples as well as for heterosexual couples.
Now, with respect to marriage, it’s my belief that it’s up to the individual denominations to make a decision as to whether they want to recognize marriage or not.
But in terms of, you know, the rights of people to transfer property, to have hospital visitation, all those critical civil rights that are conferred by our government, those should be equal.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2007 YouTube Democratic Primary debate, Charleston SC
Hillary Clinton on Civil Rights
: Jul 18, 2007
Supports DOMA, which Bill Clinton signed
Hillary stated categorically that she opposed legalizing same-sex marriage. She provided a clear explanation that to this day is the most quoted statement enunciating her position. “Marriage has historic, religious,
and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman.
But I also believe that people in committed gay marriages, as they believe them to be, should be given rights under the law that recognize and respect their relationship.“
Hillary said she backed her husband’s signing of the Defense of Marriage Act. She said what everyone wanted to know: Yes, if she had been in the Senate in 1996, she would have supported the law.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: God and Hillary Clinton, by Paul Kengor, p.189-190
Barack Obama on Civil Rights
: Mar 27, 2007
Opposed 1996 Illinois DOMA bill
I opposed the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. It should be repealed and I will vote for its repeal on the Senate floor. I will appeal any proposal to amend the U.S. constitution to ban gays and lesbians from marrying.
I know how important the issue of equal rights is to the LGBT community. I share your sense of urgency.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: In His Own Words, edited by Lisa Rogak, p. 52
Ron Paul on Crime
: Jan 22, 2007
Opposes the death penalty
He opposes the death penalty and abortion, and is strongly opposed to a military draft. He has voted against amending the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex marriage and also against an amendment to prohibit flag-burning.
Click for Ron Paul on other issues.
Source: SourceWatch.org
Ron Paul on Tax Reform
: Jan 22, 2007
Campaign slogan in 2004: The Taxpayers’ Best Friend
He supports the abolition of the income tax, most Cabinet departments, and the Federal Reserve. He also endorses a non-interventionist foreign policy and defederalization of the healthcare system. He has voted against amending the US Constitution to
ban same-sex marriage and also against an amendment to prohibit flag-burning. Paul’s campaign slogan for 2004 was “The Taxpayers’ Best Friend!,” and he has earned praise from the National Taxpayers Union and the National Federation of Independent Busines
Click for Ron Paul on other issues.
Source: SourceWatch.org
Mitt Romney on Civil Rights
: Jan 1, 2007
Marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman
I took a stand against the Massachusetts supreme-court ruling on same-sex marriage. I have made clear since 2003, when the supreme court of Massachusetts redefined marriage by fiat, that my unwavering advocacy for traditional marriage stands side by side
with a tolerance and respect for all Americans.Like the vast majority of Americans, I’ve opposed same-sex marriage, but I’ve also opposed unjust discrimination against anyone. The debate over same-sex marriage is not a debate over tolerance.
It is a debate about the purpose of the institution of marriage and it is a debate about activist judges who make up the law rather than interpret the law.
I agree with 3,000 years of recorded history. I believe marriage is a sacred institution between
a man and a woman and I have been rock solid in my support of traditional marriage. Marriage is first and foremost about nurturing and developing children. It’s unfortunate that those who choose to defend the institution of marriage are often demonized.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: RSLevinson.com “All Things Queer”, review of 2008 gay issues
Sarah Palin on Civil Rights
: Nov 3, 2006
Special legislative session on same-sex health benefits
Asked about Gov. Frank Murkowski’s call for a special legislative session on same-sex health benefits, Knowles said the session is unnecessary.
But Palin said the question was not simply about health care benefits, it was an extension of voters’ definition of marriage as between a man and a woman.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Alaska 2006 Governor Debate: AP coverage of public TV debate
Sarah Palin on Civil Rights
: Aug 6, 2006
Ok to deny benefits to homosexual couples
Here’s what Sarah Palin has to say about same-sex marriage. Palin said she’s not out to judge anyone and has good friends who are gay, but that she supported the 1998 constitutional amendment. Elected officials can’t defy the court when it comes to
how rights are applied, she said, but she would support a ballot question that would deny benefits to homosexual couples. “I believe that honoring the family structure is that important,” Palin said. She said she doesn’t know if people choose to be gay.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Anchorage Daily News, “Little play,” by K. Hopkins
Sarah Palin on Civil Rights
: Jul 31, 2006
No spousal benefits for same-sex couples
Q: Do you support the Alaska Supreme Court’s ruling that spousal benefits for state employees should be given to same-sex couples?
A: No, I believe spousal benefits are reserved for married citizens as defined in our constitution.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Eagle Forum 2006 Gubernatorial Candidate Questionnaire
Rocky Anderson on Civil Rights
: Nov 2, 2005
Extend city health benefits to unmarried same-sex partners
Salt Lake City employees with domestic partners can start to sign up for the city's health benefits programs--even though it's unclear if the city legally can offer health insurance to those gay and heterosexual partners.They must enroll their
domestic partners and their children by Nov. 30. Mayor Rocky Anderson signed an executive order in September which provides domestic-partner benefits to city-government employees including those who are part of same-sex relationships.
Click for Rocky Anderson on other issues.
Source: The Salt Lake Tribune, pp.ÿC-3, "Same-sex benefits"
Mitt Romney on Civil Rights
: Aug 12, 2004
OpEd: abdicated power in 2004 & allowed gay marriage
In Nov. 2003, the State Supreme Judicial Court gave the Massachusetts legislature 6 months to enact a law granting homosexuals the right to marry. In July, the US Supreme Court had struck down the laws of 17 states and declared homosexual sodomy to be a
constitutionally protected right. Following that decision, Justice Scalia fairly exploded:"State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity [are now] called into
question. The court has largely signed on to the homosexual agenda. The court has taken sides in the culture war."
Indeed, it had. Nevertheless, on May 17, 2004, Gov. Romney bowed to the order of the court and began handling out the marriage licenses,
though he and the state legislature believed that nothing in the constitution of the commonwealth mandated gay marriages. Few better examples exist of how unelected judges have usurped the law-making power, and how elected officials have abdicated.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: Where the Right Went Wrong, by Pat Buchanan, p.214
Paul Ryan on Civil Rights
: Jul 22, 2004
Let each state separately define DOMA and marriage
Paul Ryan today voted in favor of H.R. 3313, legislation that prevents unelected, lifetime-appointed federal judges from ruling on the Defense of Marriage Act that provides that no state shall be required to accept same-sex marriage licenses granted in
other states. The legislation provides that federal courts cannot strike down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and take away from the states the option Congress gave them to reject same-sex marriage licenses issued in another state if they want
to.
"I believe fundamentally that marriage is between a man and a woman. Although I support the constitutional amendment to protect marriage, that process cannot continue at this time given the failed attempt by the U.S. Senate to advance the
amendment. Meanwhile, states could be forced to accept same-sex marriages because of a few judges in Massachusetts. This legislation protects each state's right to protect marriage," Ryan said.
Click for Paul Ryan on other issues.
Source: 2004 House campaign press release on Defense of Marriage Act
Barack Obama on Civil Rights
: Jul 2, 1998
Include sexual orientation in anti-discrimination laws
Q: Do you believe that the Illinois government should include sexual orientation in Illinois’ anti-discrimination laws? A: Yes.
Q: Do you believe that the Illinois government should recognize same-sex marriages?
A: Undecided
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 1998 IL State Legislative National Political Awareness Test
Ron Paul on Civil Rights
: Dec 31, 1987
Rights belong only to individuals, not collective groups
After 200 years, the constitutional protection of the right of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is virtually gone.Today’s current terminology describing rights reflects this sad change.
It is commonplace for politicians and those desiring special privileges to refer to: black rights, Hispanic rights, handicap rights, employee rights, student rights, minority rights, women’s rights, gay rights, children’s rights, student rights,
Asian-American rights, Jewish rights, AIDS victims’ rights, poverty rights, homeless rights, etc.
Unless all the terms are dropped & we recognize that only an individual has rights, the solution to the mess in which we find ourselves will not be found.
The longer we lack of definition of rights, the worse the economic and social problems will be.
Click for Ron Paul on other issues.
Source: Freedom Under Siege, by Ron Paul, p. 14-15
Page last updated: Apr 30, 2013