OnTheIssuesLogo

Jim Holt on Education


Repeal the terrible No Child Left Behind Act

No Child Left Behind is terrible. The provisions of the act cannot be met. You cannot guarantee that no child will be left behind, because children are human beings. Human beings are not machines where if you hit the right button you are guaranteed a certain outcome. We have free will. Some children will choose, on their own, to not push themselves to the standards of excellence that their government says they should attain. In many cases, their parents will agree with them. And you know what that is called? It's freedom. I value education, and I am sorry that not everyone values it as much as I do, but it's their choice, not the federal government's. I'd repeal it. I don't know how many teachers I talk with and they all say the same thing. They aren't allowed to teach. They know that there are no cookie-cutter children. They know that they can't effectively do their job when the government is requiring them to spend 40 to 60 percent of their time doing paper work.
Source: Campaign website, JimHolt.us, "Issues" Jul 12, 2004

Support the use of taxpayer-funded vouchers

I support the use of taxpayer-funded vouchers to send children to private schools. But if the government wants more control for vouchers, then I would oppose them. Private and religious schools already have incredible test scores. Why would we want to handicap them the way we have our own public education system? Vouchers are not the best system, but it is a good step in the right direction. I believe parents have the right to decide where their children attend school, not the government.
Source: Campaign website, JimHolt.us, "Issues" Jul 12, 2004

Eliminate the Department of Education & NEA

I would eliminate the Department of Education and the National Endowment for the Arts.
Source: Campaign website, JimHolt.us, "Issues" Jul 12, 2004

Teacher-led voluntary prayer in public schools

Source: 2002 Arkansas National Political Awareness Test Jul 2, 2002

Vouchers OK for public, private, religious schools

Source: 2002 Arkansas National Political Awareness Test Jul 2, 2002

  • Click here for definitions & background information on Education.
  • Click here for policy papers on Education.
  • Click here for SenateMatch answers by Jim Holt.
  • Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Education in The Forum.
Other candidates on Education: Jim Holt on other issues:
AR Gubernatorial:
Mike Huckabee
AR Senatorial:
Blanche Lambert Lincoln
Dale Bumpers
David Pryor
Mark Pryor
Tim Hutchinson

Presidential:
George W. Bush
(Republican for President)
V.P.Dick Cheney
(Republican for V.P.)
Sen.John Kerry
(Democratic nominee for Pres.)
Sen.John Edwards
(Democratic nominee for V.P.)
Ralph Nader
(Reform nominee for Pres.)
Peter Camejo
(Reform nominee for V.P.)
David Cobb
(Green nominee for Pres.)
Michael Badnarik
(Libertarian nominee for Pres.)
Michael Peroutka
(Constitution nominee for Pres.)
2004 Senate Races:
(AK)Knowles v.Murkowski v.Sykes
(AR)Holt v.Lincoln
(AZ)McCain v.Starky
(CA)Boxer v.Jones v.Gray
(CO)Coors v.Salazar v.Randall v.Acosta
(CT)Dodd v.Orchulli
(FL)Castor v.Martinez
(GA)Isakson v.Majette v.Buckley
(IA)Grassley v.Small v.Northrop
(IL)Obama v.Keyes
(IN)Bayh v.Scott
(KY)Bunning v.Mongiardo
(LA)John v.Vitter v.Kennedy
(MD)Mikulski v.Pipkin
(MO)Bond v.Farmer
(NC)Bowles v.Burr
(ND)Dorgan v.Liffrig
(NH)Granny D v.Gregg
(NV)Reid v.Ziser
(NY)Schumer v.Mills v.McReynolds
(OH)Fingerhut v.Voinovich
(OK)Carson v.Coburn
(OR)Wyden v.King
(PA)Hoeffel v.Specter v.Summers
(SC)DeMint v.Tenenbaum
(SD)Daschle v.Thune
(UT)Bennett v.Van Dam
(VT)Leahy v.McMullen
(WA)Murray v.Nethercutt
(WI)Feingold v.Michels
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
HouseMatch
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes