Topics in the News: United Nations

Donald Trump on Foreign Policy : Jan 30, 2018
Foreign aid only to friends of America

Dozens of countries voted in the United Nations General Assembly against America's sovereign right to make the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. American taxpayers generously send those same countries billions of dollars in aid every year.

That is why, tonight, I am asking the Congress to pass legislation to help ensure American foreign-assistance dollars always serve American interests, and only go to America's friends.

Click for Donald Trump on other issues.   Source: 2018 State of the Union address

Lindsey Graham on Foreign Policy : Dec 22, 2017
Recognize Jerusalem as capital of Israel

Sen. Lindsey Graham ripped the United Nations, dubbing the global body as weak and increasingly anti-semitic. "I don't mind the United Nations expressing displeasure with American foreign policy decisions through a non-binding vote of the General Assembly," Graham said in a tweet referring to a UN resolution condemning U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as the Israeli capital.We will deal with these issues in 2018," he continued.

Graham's comments come one day after 128 nations, including some of the U.S.'s most loyal allies, voted in favor of a resolution condemning President Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. The senator has often been critical of the UN in the past.

Click for Lindsey Graham on other issues.   Source: The Hill: coverage of 2020 presidential hopefuls

Donald Trump on Foreign Policy : Dec 22, 2016
Supports construction of Israeli settlements in West Bank

President-elect Donald Trump publicly pressured President Obama to veto a United Nations resolution critical of Israel. Trump called on the president to use the US veto in the UN Security Council to block the Arab-sponsored resolution, which condemned the "construction and expansion" of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. The Obama administration, which vetoed a similar resolution in 2011, had withheld judgment over the latest measure.

Trump amplified his position by posting the statement on Facebook and Twitter as well: "The resolution being considered at the United Nations Security Council regarding Israel should be vetoed." His words closely echoed the positions expressed by Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has treated the impending UN vote as a crisis, posting on his own Twitter account a message urging Obama to veto what he called the "anti-Israel" resolution. Egypt, who drafted the resolution, withdrew it afterwards.

Click for Donald Trump on other issues.   Source: NY Times on Twitter posting: 2016 Trump transition promises

Evan McMullin on Foreign Policy : Oct 1, 2016
The U.S. should remain in the United Nations

Q: Should the U.S. remain in the United Nations?

Evan McMullin: Yes

Click for Evan McMullin on other issues.   Source: Voter Guide on 2016 Presidential hopefuls

Evan McMullin on Immigration : Aug 12, 2016
Worked briefly as UN volunteer refugee resettlement officer

After graduating from Brigham Young University in 2001, McMullin worked as a Volunteer Refugee Resettlement Officer for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Shortly before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, he began training with the Central Intelligence Agency.
Click for Evan McMullin on other issues.   Source: Wikipedia article on 2016 presidential hopeful

Gary Johnson on Foreign Policy : May 2, 2016
Stay in the U.N., but stay out of foreign interventions

Click for Gary Johnson on other issues.   Source: iSideWith analysis of Foreign Policy

Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil : Oct 13, 2015
Obama & I crashed China meeting and got climate change deal

Q: What will you do about climate change?

CLINTON: I have been on the forefront of dealing with climate change, starting in 2009, when President Obama and I crashed a meeting with the Chinese and got them to sign up to the first international agreement to combat climate change that they'd ever joined.

Q: Are you referring to the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen?

CLINTON: When we met in Copenhagen in 2009 and, literally, President Obama and I were hunting for the Chinese, going throughout this huge convention center, because we knew we had to get them to agree to something. Because there will be no effective efforts against climate change unless China and India join with the rest of the world. They told us they'd left for the airport; we found out they were having a secret meeting. We marched up, we broke in, we said, "Let's sit down and talk about what we need to do." And we did come up with the first international agreement that China has signed.

Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.   Source: 2015 CNN Democratic primary debate in Las Vegas

Ted Cruz on Foreign Policy : Sep 16, 2015
Don't let world courts bind American sovereignty

Q: Governor Kasich accuses you of playing to the crowd and being inexperienced.

CRUZ: Well, let's be clear when it comes to experience. What President Obama wants to do is he's run to the United Nations, and he wants to use the United Nations to bind the United States, and take away our sovereignty. Well, I spent five and a half years as a Solicitor General of Texas, the lead lawyer for the state, in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, and I went in front of the Supreme Court, and took on the World Court of the United Nations in a case called Medellin v. Texas, and we won a historic victory saying the World Court, and the U.N., has no power to bind the United States, and no President of the United States, Republican or Democrat, has the authority to give away our sovereignty.

Click for Ted Cruz on other issues.   Source: 2015 Republican two-tiered primary debate on CNN

Tim Kaine on Free Trade : Jul 10, 2015
Unfair Chinese trade practices are hurting American workers

[Kaine and Sen. Mark Warner wrote in a joint press release]: Various international organizations, including the United Nations and the World Trade Organization, state as a principle foundation of trade that competition must be fair and rules should be enforced. We play by the rules. It's only right to ask our counterparts to do the same. "Made in China" labels have become prominent in the goods we buy in this country. China is the US's second largest trading partner after Canada and our geopolitical strategy for the future includes an increased focus on the Asia-Pacific region. In other words--China's not going anywhere. Now more than ever we need to put in place and enforce a set of rules to ensure that our ability to compete isn't diminished down the line.

When fairer trade conditions are restored, and US producers are on a level playing field, we can out-compete anyone. China shouldn't be allowed to play by its own rules.

Click for Tim Kaine on other issues.   Source: Kaine Senate office Commonwealth Connection

Rand Paul on Foreign Policy : Jan 1, 2015
Where do Ron and Rand Paul disagree on foreign issues?

Where Ron Paul and Rand Paul agree on Foreign issues
  • Both oppose Iraq War
  • Both oppose Cuban embargo
  • Both agree on rights for Guantanamo detainees
  • Both agree on non-intervention abroad
  • Both oppose the TSA
  • Both oppose the United Nations
Where they disagree:Ron PaulRand Paul
Iran:Stay out of Iran Keep options on Iran
Israel:Cut off all aid Maintain alliance
Privacy vs National Security:Privacy first against terrorismSpying on terrorists ok
Foreign aid:End foreign aid Limit foreign aid
Military Spending:Cut absolute defense spendingCut relative defense spending
Click for Rand Paul on other issues.   Source: Analysis: Ron Paul vs. Rand Paul on the Issues

Ted Cruz on Civil Rights : Mar 7, 2014
UN Treaty on Disabilities threatens US sovereignty

Even before taking office, Cruz made his influence felt in the Senate when he was invited to join the weekly lunch of the Senate Republican caucus on December 4, 2012--the day the full Senate was debating the United Nations treaty on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. It seemed a fairly uncontroversial issue until Cruz expressed his opposition: "I was a newly elected senator who hadn't even sworn in yet, but I [said] the issues of U.S. sovereignty resonate powerfully with the American people," Cruz recounted.

To lobby for passage of the treaty, former Republican majority leader Bob Dole was brought in a wheelchair. Cruz explained, "I personally have been passionate about protecting U.S. sovereignty, that our laws should reflect American values, and not be governed by the laws or tribunals of foreign nations or foreign institutions. I urged my soon-to-be colleagues to protect U.S. sovereignty, and ultimately they did so.

Click for Ted Cruz on other issues.   Source: Cruzing to the White House, by Mario Broes, p. 73-4

Ted Cruz on Foreign Policy : Mar 7, 2014
Deny visa for Iranian ambassador to visit the United Nations

On April 1, 2014, Cruz introduced Senate bill 2195, a bill that would allow the President of the United States to deny visas to any ambassador to the United Nations who has been found to have been engaged in espionage activities or a terrorist activity against the United States or its allies and may pose a threat to U.S. national security interests. The bill was written in response to Iran's choice of Hamid Aboutalebi as their ambassador to the UN in New York. Aboutalebi was involved in the Iran hostage crisis, in which of a number of American diplomats from the U.S. embassy in Tehran were held captive in 1979.

In a letter published in the Politico on April 18, 2014, under the headline "A Bipartisan Message to Iran", Sen. Ted Cruz thanked President Barack Obama for signing his bill into law:

Click for Ted Cruz on other issues.   Source: Cruzing to the White House, by Mario Broes, p. 97-8

Peter King on War & Peace : Sep 9, 2013
We cannot allow Iranian pursuit of nuclear weapons

Iran poses a grave threat not only to Israel and the Middle East, but also to the US and the entire world. It is the world's leading state sponsor of terror and continues to violate United Nations Security Council Resolutions in its pursuit of nuclear weapons. That is something we cannot allow. Strong economic sanctions on Iran have been enacted with my strong support. We must take decisive action against this dangerous regime and keep all options on the table. I have endorsed:
Click for Peter King on other issues.   Source: Congressional website,, "Issues"

Rick Santorum on War & Peace : Aug 31, 2013
Unclear which side in Syria used chemical weapons

Santorum said, "The impact of the failure of this administration in both Egypt and in Syria is going to have a ripple effect in the Middle East and for our country for a long, long time. It's because we have a president who has decided to defer his foreign policy to the United Nations. He's a president who believes that America is not a moral force or a military or ideological force in the world."

Santorum said he has no "doubt" chemical weapons were used, but he is not sure which side used them, differing from the administration and most voices weighing in on the issue. "It wouldn't be a surprise to me that both sides were using them or that the radical Islamists are using them," Santorum said. "While I agree it is very clear that chemical weapons were used--the idea that we need to be punishing Assad and doing things to tip the balance in favor of al Qaeda who are running the rebel forces to me is a very questionable tactic of itself.

Click for Rick Santorum on other issues.   Source: ABC News "Candidates stand on Syria"

Ajamu Baraka on War & Peace : Mar 21, 2013
No one ever held accountable for US attack on Iraq

The U.S. attack on Iraq defied both an outraged world opinion--expressed by global mass demonstrations--and the United Nations charter. Ten years later, the awesome consequences of that criminal assault are clear. More than $1 trillion spent, almost 5,000 American lives lost, more than 32,000 Americans wounded, estimates of a million dead Iraqis and almost 5 million displaced. Yet, ten years later, no one, not one government official, has been held accountable.
Click for Ajamu Baraka on other issues.   Source: Ajamu Baraka column in Counterpunch, "War Crimes in Iraq"

Jill Stein on War & Peace : Nov 1, 2012
National conversation before we go to war

Q: The Green Party platform states that the US must handle disputes with foreign countries through the United Nations. If a humanitarian crisis erupts and the UN fails to pass a resolution would you consider bypassing the UN and staging an intervention without the assistance of other countries?

STEIN: I think the priority is that we do not bypass the American people who have been routinely bypassed in most of the interventions in recent decades including Iraq and Libya. This is being done without the explicit permission from Congress and is a critical check and balance that has gotten lost in the shuffle and is a violation of the US Constitution and the war powers act. It is very dangerous when politicians declare war and exhaust economic resources and spill the blood of Americans and civilians overseas. Most of the conflicts of the last decade would not have happened had there been a national conversation and discussion about what the true risks and benefits of our national security were.

Click for Jill Stein on other issues.   Source: interview of Jill Stein

John Bolton on Gun Control : Jul 18, 2012
UN Arms Trade Treaty violates our Second Amendment freedoms

Gun-control advocates and the Obama administration are rushing to complete negotiations in New York on a proposed international agreement called the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.

But the United States already has a strong regulatory regime under the Arms Export Control Act to license the export of American-made weapons.

During the 2001 debate, I spoke at the UN General Assembly in New York, and the reaction to my remarks revealed the gun-controllers' hidden agenda.

I said merely that the United States would not agree to any proposed treaty that would violate our Second Amendment freedoms. From the gun-control lobby's reaction, you would have thought I said something outrageous or even dangerous. In truth, they knew we had uncovered their agenda and spiked it.

Click for John Bolton on other issues.   Source: AEI Scholars column: A sneaky way

Gary Johnson on War & Peace : May 16, 2012
Cut all support and aid to Israel

Q: Should the U.S. continue to support Israel?

A: No, cut all support and aid.

Q: Should the U.S. intervene in the affairs of other countries?

A: Yes, but only in matters of national security.

Q: How should the U.S. deal with Iran?

A: Iran does not threaten our national security and there is no proof they are building a nuclear weapon.

Q: Should the U.S. maintain a presence at the United Nations?

A: Yes, but scale back our current involvement.

Click for Gary Johnson on other issues.   Source: Presidential comparison website

Marco Rubio on Foreign Policy : Apr 25, 2012
Prefer coalitions but don't over-rely on global institutions

Rubio stressed the need for America to build coalitions when becoming involved in foreign affairs, saying there is no other country "to hand off the baton to, even if it were wise to do so." But such coalition building should not hamper the US from leading on the international stage, he said. The senator criticized President Obama for "an overreliance on institutions, global institutions whether it's the security council or it's the United Nations to take the lead on some of these issues." He cited Libya as a case in which the president waited too long to lead, and results were stifled because of inaction.

But, the Tea Party favorite did express his desires to building coalitions before beginning any foreign entanglement. "America has acted unilaterally in the past--and I believe it should continue to do so in the future--when necessity requires," he said. "But our preferred option since the U.S. became a global leader has been to work with others to achieve our goals."

Click for Marco Rubio on other issues.   Source: MSNBC on Rubio's speech to Brookings Institution

Jill Stein on Energy & Oil : Jan 29, 2012
We can't wait 4 more years to address climate change

Q: What about the recent debacle in Durban [the 2011 United Nations Climate Change Conference]?

A: This is another reason why we're running the campaign now--because if you follow the science, we don't have four years to wait. We really have to start tackling this now. It's really important for the climate and it's time that people put their politics where their values and science argue they ought to be. I think Obama supporters are really having a rude awakening right now. The US, as you know, is the largest per capita contributor to climate change and the direction the US pushes goes a long way toward determining what the rest of the world does, and from that perspective, dramatically downscaling carbon emissions goes a long way toward determining the global carbon budget and helps move global policy that way.

Click for Jill Stein on other issues.   Source: Interview with Steve Horn of

Mitt Romney on Foreign Policy : Sep 22, 2011
Unacceptable for Iran to become a nuclear nation

Q: How would you approach the new reality for our ally, Israel, and the existential threats it faces from Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah?

ROMNEY: Very simple. You start off by saying that you don't allow an inch of space to exist between you and your friends and your allies. The president went about this all wrong. He went around the world and apologized for America. He addressed the United Nations in his inaugural address and chastised our friend, Israel, for building settlements and said nothing about Hamas launching thousands of rockets into Israel. The right course for us is to stand behind our friends, to listen to them, and to let the entire world know that we will stay with them and that we will support them and defend them. And with regards to Iran, which perhaps represents the greatest existential threat to Israel, we have to make it abundantly clear: It is unacceptable--and I take that word carefully--it is unacceptable for Iran to become a nuclear nation.

Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.   Source: 2011 GOP Google debate in Orlando FL

Tim Kaine on War & Peace : Jun 19, 2011
Obama had a "good rationale" for going in Libya in 2011

Kaine said that the Obama administration should consult Congress further over American involvement in Libya's civil war. "Err on the side of caution and go to Congress," Kaine said. When asked whether the War Powers Act legally requires the White House to get congressional approval for Libya, Kaine was noncommittal, adding that the president had a "good rationale" for going in, given that sanctions had failed and the United Nations and the Arab League signed off on intervention.
Click for Tim Kaine on other issues.   Source: The Daily Progress, "Kaine talks Libya," by Graham Moomaw

Rand Paul on Foreign Policy : Nov 1, 2010
Exit the UN; maintain US sovereignty

Q: Do you support U.S. withdrawal from the United Nations?

A: Yes.

Q: Will you support legislation that forbids U.S. troops from serving under United Nations command?

A: Yes.

Q: Will you support the American Sovereignty Act to restrict the Executive's ability to forge international agreements that lessen our sovereignty?

A: Yes.

Q: Will you oppose the so-called "NAFTA Superhighway" and any move toward a North American Union?

A: Yes.

Click for Rand Paul on other issues.   Source: Campaign for Liberty survey of 2010 Congressional candidates

Carly Fiorina on War & Peace : Jun 9, 2010
Impose crippling sanctions on Iran

Today the United Nations Security Council finally voted to impose new sanctions on Iran in response to that country's continued pursuit of nuclear weapons in defiance of the international community. But this vote was no victory for peace or security.

In order to get Russia and China on board, President Obama gutted the sanctions that were once promised to be "crippling' and later downgraded to "biting.' Today's sanctions are so watered down that Russian Prime Minister Putin vowed they would "not put Iran's leadership or the Iranian people into difficulty.'

If Iran's leadership is not put "into difficulty' by these sanctions, American interests and those of our allies will be. This is the fourth round of U.N. sanctions on Iran, yet Iran continues to work toward a nuclear weapon.

The United States Congress can impose its own sanctions on Iran, real sanctions that would cause Iran's leadership great difficulty.

Click for Carly Fiorina on other issues.   Source: Press release on United Nations Iran Sanctions vote

Newt Gingrich on Families & Children : May 17, 2010
Stop funding China's mandatory one-child policy

Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.   Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.277-278

Newt Gingrich on Foreign Policy : May 17, 2010
UN is corrupt bureaucracy that protects dictators

The United Nations was formed as a vehicle for world leaders to promote peace, human rights, and economic development. Tragically, from these noble origins, the UN has evolved into a corrupt, inept, bureaucratic machine that protects the world's worst dictatorships.

Since even the most despotic governments are entitled to UN membership, the UN is not limited by elections or the need to keep up democratic appearances. And, lacking America's legal framework for government transparency, the organizatio is more prone to corruption.

The UN's most influential voting block is a group of 130 undeveloped countries called the G-77. Using the UN's one country-one vote system, the G-77 has hijacked the UN to turn it into a mechanism for redistributing wealth from developed to developing countries.

The beneficiaries are not poverty-stricken families suffering under dictatorships. To the contrary, the illicit funds go straight to their oppressors--the privileged bureaucrats that prop up despotic regimes.

Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.   Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.129-133

Barack Obama on Foreign Policy : Dec 10, 2009
The UN has succeeded in avoiding a Third World War

With the advent of the nuclear age, it became clear to victor and vanquished alike that the world needed institutions to prevent another World War. And so, a quarter century after the US Senate rejected the League of Nations--an idea for which Woodrow Wilson received this Prize--America led the world in constructing an architecture to keep the peace: a Marshall Plan and a United Nations, mechanisms to govern the waging of war, treaties to protect human rights, prevent genocide, and restrict the most dangerous weapons.

In many ways, these efforts succeeded. Yes, terrible wars have been fought, and atrocities committed. But there has been no Third World War. The Cold War ended with jubilant crowds dismantling a wall. Billions have been lifted from poverty. The ideals of liberty, self-determination, equality and the rule of law have haltingly advanced. We are the heirs of the fortitude and foresight of generations past, and it is a legacy for which my own country is rightfully proud.

Click for Barack Obama on other issues.   Source: Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech in Oslo, Norway

Barack Obama on War & Peace : Oct 7, 2008
Prevent Iran from attacking Israel, but keep military option

Q: If Iran attacks Israel, would you be willing to commit US troops in defense of Israel? Or would you wait on approval from the UN Security Council?

McCAIN: We obviously would not wait for the United Nations Security Council. Both Russia and China would probably pose significant obstacles.

OBAMA: We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so itís unacceptable. And I will do everything thatís required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table. And it is important that we donít provide veto power to the UN or anyone else in acting in our interests. It is important, though, for us to use all the tools at our disposal to prevent the scenario where weíve got to make those kinds of choices.

Click for Barack Obama on other issues.   Source: 2008 second presidential debate against John McCain

Mike Bloomberg on Energy & Oil : Feb 11, 2008
US must set real and binding carbon reduction targets

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Bali, which was my privilege to address, was an historic gathering. It set the stage for a global compact that advances the progress begun some 10 years ago at Kyoto.

However, between now and the Copenhagen Conference next year, we must establish, I think, the preconditions for such progress. Both developed and developing nations must recognize the need to alter their policies and make serious commitments to change. And I believe that our experience in New York City, and the experience of many of the worldís other great cities, too, can help guide that process.

The first precondition for making the Copenhagen negotiations a success, I believe, is that the US, which leads the world in greenhouse gas production, must finally set real and binding carbon reduction targets. And I believe the American people are prepared to accept our responsibility to lead by example.

Click for Mike Bloomberg on other issues.   Source: Speech to the United Nations on tropical hardwoods

Mike Bloomberg on Foreign Policy : Feb 11, 2008
Maintains mayoral office for UN relations, run by his sister

The United Nations has been, and always will be important to New York City for the vital work that you do and I think important to this country and to the world. And its importance to New York is shown by the fact that the Mayorís office maintains a ďCommission for the United Nations, Consular Corps, & Protocol,Ē whose commissioner is my sister, Marjorie Tiven.

Of course, being the Mayor of NYC--the worldís most international city--is a bit like presiding over the UN every single day of the year

Click for Mike Bloomberg on other issues.   Source: Speech to the United Nations on tropical hardwoods

Hillary Clinton on War & Peace : Jan 13, 2008
Voted against Levin Amendment: it gave UN veto over US

Q: In 2002, Sen. Levin offered an amendment, the Levin amendment, which called for the UN to pass a new resolution explicitly approving the use of force against Iraq. It also required the president to return to Congress if his UN efforts failed. You did not participate in that vote.

A: Number one, the Levin amendment, in my view, gave the Security Council of the United Nations a veto over American presidential power. I donít believe that is an appropriate policy for the United States, no matter who is our president. Number two, I have the greatest respect for Senator Levin. He is my chairman on the Senate Armed Services Committee. And immediately after we did have the vote on the authorization, went to work with him to try to make sure that every piece of intelligence we had was given to the UN inspectors. Number three, I actually joined with Senator Byrd on an amendment that would limit the presidentís authorization to one year.

Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.   Source: Meet the Press: 2008 ďMeet the CandidatesĒ series

Joe Biden on Foreign Policy : Dec 4, 2007
Hold China accountable; itís capitulation, not competition

Q: Many presidential candidates have talked tough about China and its human rights record in the past but, in the end, favor securing our economic interest rather than risk upsetting China. How would you balance human rights and trade with China?

A: Iíve been pushing, on the Foreign Relations Committee for the last seven years, that we hold China accountable at the United Nations. At the UN, we wonít even designate China as a violator of human rights. Now, whatís the deal there? We talk about competition in terms of trade. Itís capitulation, not competition. Name me another country in the world that we would allow to conduct themselves the way China has, and not call them on the carpet at the UN

Q: So you would call them on th carpet?

A: Absolutely.

Q: You would appoint a UN ambassador who would press for this?

A: Itís the one way to get China to reform. You canít close your eyes. You canít pretend. It is self-defeating. Itís a Hobsonís choice weíre giving people here.

Click for Joe Biden on other issues.   Source: 2007 Democratic radio debate on NPR

John Bolton on Foreign Policy : Nov 6, 2007
United Nations Security Council overemphasizes Africa

The concentration of the Security Council's work on Africa is staggering, In mid-2005, there were 8 continuing African peacekeeping operations, out of a total of 17 worldwide.

In 2006, the Council passed a total of 87 resolutions, of which 76 dealt with specific conflict situations. Of those, 46 addressed African conflicts. As tragic and homicidal as Africa's conflicts have been, however, there is no serious argument that 60% of the aggregate threat to international peace and security is concentrated on that continent, not when compared to the global proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and international terrorism. The Council concentrates on Africa for a variety of reasons, and one could make the argument that this concentration was justified if problems in Africa were actually being solved. The unfortunate reality, however, is that the UN is both ineffective in Africa and inattentive (and often ineffective) to more pervasive problems elsewhere.

Click for John Bolton on other issues.   Source: Surrender is Not an Option, by John Bolton, p.341-342

Mike Huckabee on War & Peace : Jun 10, 2007
Insist that Iraqís neighbors assist military & financially

Q: The United Nations says there already have been two million refugees who have fled Iraq, mostly to Jordan and to Syria. Isnít this a huge refugee crisis already?

A: It is a huge problem. But imagine if millions and millions more go to these countries, whose infrastructure simply canít absorb them. Then you have a destabilized region. One of the things that the US must do is to more strongly insist to the Saudis, the Jordanians, the Turks, the Kuwaitis that their involvement militarily, their involvement financially, their involvement even theologically with the more radical wings of the Islamic faith are critical for us to solve this issue.

Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.   Source: CNN Late Edition: 2007 presidential series with Wolf Blitzer

Hillary Clinton on Principles & Values : Apr 26, 2007
Biggest mistakes: mishandling healthcare; believing in WMDs

Q What is the most significant political or professional mistake you have made in the past four years?

A: Well, I donít have enough time to tell you all the mistakes Iíve made in the last many years. Certainly, the mistakes I made around health care were deeply troubling to me and interfered with our ability to get our message out. And, you know, believing the president when he said he would go to the United Nations and put inspectors into Iraq to determine whether they had WMD.

Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.   Source: 2007 South Carolina Democratic primary debate, on MSNBC

Hillary Clinton on War & Peace : Feb 25, 2004
2002 Iraq speech criticized both Saddam and U.N.

[On the 2002 Iraq war vote], she managed to sound vehemently anti Saddam without sounding pro Bush. In a floor speech on the measure to authorize the use of force in Iraq, Hillary managed quite a juggling act. She criticized the United Nations for puttin limits on inspection sites. She warned of Saddam Husseinís ambitions for weapons of mass destruction. she concluded that going to war against Iraq Ďon the present facts is not a good optioní but voted to enable George W. Bush to lead the nation into war.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.   Source: Madame Hillary, by R. Emmett Tyrell, p. 48-49

Hillary Clinton on War & Peace : Feb 25, 2004
2002: Attacking Iraq "not a good option" but authorized it

Hillary ultimately voted for the resolution empowering President Bush to wage war, but she did so with a perfect equipoise. She managed to sound vehemently ant-Saddam without sounding pro-Bush.

In a floor speech on the measure to authorize the use of force against Iraq, Hillary managed quite a juggling act, keeping a whole cupboard of teacups and saucers spinning in the air. She criticized the United Nations for putting limits on inspection sites. She warned of Saddam Hussein's ambitions for weapons of mass destruction. She worried that an unchecked Saddam could endanger the entire Middle East (read: Israel). She fretted that a "unilateral" attack could prompt Russia to attack Chechen rebels in Georgia, China to attack Taiwan, and India to attack Pakistan. She concluded that going to war against Iraq "on the present facts is not a good option"--but voted to enable George W. Bush to lead the nation into war.

Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.   Source: Madame Hillary, by R. Emmett Tyrrell, p. 48-49

Hillary Clinton on Foreign Policy : Oct 20, 2000
Keep Cuban embargo; pay UN bills

Hillary Clinton said she would oppose lifting the embargo against Cuba until democracy took root there. She said she would support paying Americaís unpaid bills to the United Nations. She once again voiced her support for Israel and, while praising the tentative cease-fire agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians reached Monday, she made it clear the burden was on Yasir Arafat to end the violence.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.   Source: Dean Murphy, NY Times

  • Additional quotations related to United Nations issues can be found under Foreign Policy.
  • Click here for definitions & background information on Foreign Policy.
Candidates on Foreign Policy:

 Related issues:
American Exceptionalism
Arab Spring
Foreign Aid
North Korea
Refugee Crisis

2016 Presidential primary contenders:
Secy.Hillary Clinton(D-NY)
Sen.Tim Kaine(D-VA,VP)
Donald Trump(R-NY)
Gov.Mike Pence(R-IN,VP)
Gov.Gary Johnson(L-NM)
Gov.Bill Weld(L-MA,VP)
Dr.Jill Stein(G-MA)
Ajamu Baraka(G-VP)
Evan McMullin(I-UT)

Pres.Barack Obama
V.P.Joe Biden
Secy.John Kerry
2015-16 Presidential primary contenders:
Gov.Jeb Bush(R-FL)
Dr.Ben Carson(T-MD)
Gov.Chris Christie(R-NJ)
Sen.Ted Cruz(T-TX)
CEO Carly Fiorina(R-CA)
Gov.Bobby Jindal(R-LA)
Gov.Gary Johnson(L-NM)
Gov.Martin O`Malley(D-MD)
Sen.Rand Paul(R-KY)
Gov.Rick Perry(R-TX)
Sen.Marco Rubio(R-FL)
Sen.Bernie Sanders(I-VT)
Sen.Rick Santorum(R-PA)
Jill Stein(G-MA)
Gov.Scott Walker(R-WI)
Sen.James Webb(D-VA)
Please consider volunteering for OnTheIssues!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Mar 07, 2018