Rick Sikma on Gun Control

Republican Senate Challenger

Gun ownership is Constitutionally guaranteed

Q: Do you support or oppose the policy: "Absolute right to gun ownership"?

A: SUPPORT: The Constitution guarantees us this right. The 2nd Amendment is an important part of our rights and I will continue to support and defend our freedom and right to be

Source: Email interview on 2008 Senate race with OnTheIssues.org Jun 2, 2008

2nd Amendment is an important part of inalienable rights

Our constitution guarantees the people certain inalienable rights, without infringement. The 2nd Amendment is an important part of those rights and I will continue to support and defend its continued presence. Source: Campaign website, www.ricksikma.com, "Issues" May 30, 2008

Click here for definitions & background information on Gun Control. Click here for a profile of Rick Sikma. Click here for SenateMatch answers by Rick Sikma. Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Gun Control in The Forum. Click here for a summary of Rick Sikma's positions on all issues. Click here for issue positions of other AK politicians.
*Other candidates on Gun Control:*		*Rick Sikma on other issues:*
*AK Gubernatorial:* Sarah Palin *AK Senatorial:* Dave Cuddy Lisa Murkowski Mark Begich Ted Stevens Vic Vickers *2008 Senate retirements:* Wayne Allard(R,CO) Larry Craig(R,ID) Pete Domenici(R,NM) Chuck Hagel(R,NE) Trent Lott(R,MS) Craig Thomas(R,WY) John Warner(R,VA) *2008 Presidential Contenders:* Chuck Baldwin(C) Rep.Bob Barr(L) Sen.Hillary Clinton(D) Sen.Mike Gravel(L) Alan Keyes(C) Sen.John McCain(R) Rep.Cynthia McKinney(G) Ralph Nader(I) Sen.Barack Obama(D) Rep.Ron Paul(R)	*2008 Senate Races:* AK:Stevens v.Begich v.Cuddy v.Sikma AL:Sessions v.Figures AR:Pryor v.Kennedy CO:Schaffer v.Udall DE:Biden v.O`Donnell GA:Chambliss v.Martin v.Buckley IA:Harkin v.Reed ID:Risch v.LaRocco v.Rammell IL:Durbin v.Sauerberg v.Stafford KS:Roberts v.Jones v.Slattery KY:McConnell v.Lunsford LA:Landrieu v.Kennedy MA:Kerry v.Beatty v.Underwood ME:Collins v.Allen MI:Levin v.Hoogendyk v.Boman v.Nikitin MN:Coleman v.Franken v.Barkley v.Cavlan MS4:Wicker v.Musgrove MS6:Cochran v.Fleming MT:Baucus v.Kelleher NC:Dole v.Hagan NE:Johanns v.Kleeb v.Larrick NH:Sununu v.Shaheen v.Blevens NJ:Lautenberg v.Zimmer Pearce v.Udall OK:Inhofe v.Rice OR:Smith v.Merkley v.Brownlow RI:Reed v.Young v.Tingle SC:Graham v.Conley v.McBride SD:Johnson v.Dykstra TN:Alexander v.Tuke v.Lugo v.Heyward TX:Cornyn v.Noriega v.Jameson VA:Gilmore v.Warner WV:Rockefeller v.Wolfe WY4:Barrasso v.Carter WY6:Enzi v.Rothfuss	Abortion Budget/Economy Civil Rights Corporations Crime Drugs Education Energy/Oil Environment Families Foreign Policy Free Trade Govt. Reform Gun Control Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Jobs Principles Social Security Tax Reform Technology War/Peace Welfare Other Senators House of Representatives SenateMatch (matching quiz) Senate Votes (analysis) House Votes Bill Sponsorships Affiliations Policy Reports Group Ratings

Page last updated: Sep 28, 2008