Milton Friedman on Technology
When technical conditions make a monopoly the natural outcome of competitive market forces, there are only 3 alternatives that seem available: private monopoly, public monopoly, or public regulation. All 3 are bad so we must choose among evils.
I reluctantly conclude that, if tolerable, private monopoly may be the least of the evils. If society were static so that the conditions which give rise to a technical monopoly were sure to remain, I would have little confidence in this solution. In a rapidly changing society, the conditions making for technical monopoly frequently change and I suspect that both public regulation and public monopoly are likely to be less responsive to such changes in conditions, to be less readily capable of elimination, than private monopoly.
|Other pundits on Technology:||Milton Friedman on other issues:|
Opinion Leaders on the Right:
Milton Friedman (Nobel Economist)
Rush Limbaugh' (Radio Talk Show Host)
Ayn Rand (Author and Philosopher)
Heritage Foundation (Think Tank)
Opinion Leaders on the Left:
Noam Chomsky (Author and Philosopher)
Arianna Huffington (Internet Columnist)
Robert Reich (Professor and Columnist)
Howard Schultz (CEO of Starbucks)
Sierra Club (Environmental Organization)
John F. Kennedy(President,1961-1963)