OnTheIssuesLogo

Art Small on Corporations


Set up research facilities instead of trying to pick winners

We ought to question whether the state should directly fund individual companies no matter how promising they may appear to be. It is difficult for the state not to play this investment development game because it seems to have become the established practice for firms to get states to bid for such projects. All states "dangle dollars" today.

Another approach that might be considered is that taken many years ago by North Carolina when it set up its Research Triangle Institute Park. It made no attempt to pick winners. Rather, it made land and facilities available in close proximity to its three major universities and developed an administrative structure that encouraged cooperation between the universities and the Institute's tenants. Research Triangle Institute changed the economic face of North Carolina. Oakdale Research Park in Coralville has used a similar approach on a much smaller scale. Even that small-scale effort has been quite beneficial.

Source: Op-ed piece in Iowa City Press-Citizen Mar 23, 2004

  • Click here for definitions & background information on Corporations.
  • Click here for policy papers on Corporations.
  • Click here for SenateMatch answers by Art Small.
  • Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Corporations in The Forum.
Other candidates on Corporations: Art Small on other issues:
IA Gubernatorial:
Tom Vilsack
IA Senatorial:
Chuck Grassley
Daryl Northrop
Greg Ganske
Tom Harkin

Presidential:
George W. Bush
(Republican for President)
V.P.Dick Cheney
(Republican for V.P.)
Sen.John Kerry
(Democratic nominee for Pres.)
Sen.John Edwards
(Democratic nominee for V.P.)
Ralph Nader
(Reform nominee for Pres.)
Peter Camejo
(Reform nominee for V.P.)
David Cobb
(Green nominee for Pres.)
Michael Badnarik
(Libertarian nominee for Pres.)
Michael Peroutka
(Constitution nominee for Pres.)
2004 Senate Races:
(AK)Knowles v.Murkowski v.Sykes
(AL)Shelby v.Sowell
(AR)Holt v.Lincoln
(AZ)McCain v.Starky
(CA)Boxer v.Jones v.Gray
(CO)Coors v.Salazar v.Randall v.Acosta
(CT)Dodd v.Orchulli
(FL)Castor v.Martinez
(GA)Isakson v.Majette v.Buckley
(HI)Inouye
(IA)Grassley v.Small v.Northrop
(ID)Crapo
(IL)Obama v.Keyes
(IN)Bayh v.Scott
(KS)Brownback
(KY)Bunning v.Mongiardo
(LA)John v.Vitter
(MD)Mikulski v.Pipkin
(MO)Bond v.Farmer
(NC)Bowles v.Burr
(ND)Dorgan v.Liffrig
(NH)Granny D v.Gregg
(NV)Reid v.Ziser
(NY)Schumer v.Mills v.McReynolds
(OH)Fingerhut v.Voinovich
(OK)Carson v.Coburn
(OR)Wyden v.King
(PA)Hoeffel v.Specter
(SC)DeMint v.Tenenbaum
(SD)Daschle v.Thune
(UT)Bennett v.Van Dam
(VT)Leahy v.McMullen
(WA)Murray v.Nethercutt
(WI)Feingold v.Michels
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
HouseMatch
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes