|
Lee Zeldin on Civil Rights
|
|
Fighting Islamophobia requires defining "Islamophobia"
Lee Zeldin, member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, one of two Jewish Republicans in Congress, and co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus, announced that he will vote against H.R. 5665, a partisan resolution:
"Rep. Ilhan Omar's bill that is supposed to combat Islamophobia does not even define 'Islamophobia'. In fact, the way the bill is worded intentionally plays into Omar's calculating game that any criticism about any topic relating to her, even
if it has absolutely nothing at all to do with her religion, could be defined as 'Islamophobia'. That is absurd and I will vote 'no'!"
[H.R.5665, the "Combating International Islamophobia Act," establishes within the Department of
State the Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia; see details of H.R.5665]
Source: P.R. "Islamophobia": 2022 Congress NY-1 election on HR5665
, Dec 14, 2021
Opposed equal marriage rights for same-sex couples
Excerpts from legislation: AN ACT to amend the domestic relations law. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Marriage Equality Act". Marriage is a fundamental human right. Same-sex couples should have the same access as
others to the protections, responsibilities, rights, obligations, and benefits of civil marriage. Stable family relationships help build a stronger society. For the welfare of the community and in fairness to all
New Yorkers, this act formally recognizes otherwise-valid marriages without regard to whether the parties are of the same or different sex. It is the intent of the legislature that the marriages of same-sex and different-sex couples be treated equally
in all respects under the law.Legislative outcome: Bill passed Senate 33-29-0; State Senator Lee Zeldin voted NAY; Bill Passed House 80-63-3; Signed by Governor Cuomo, June 24
Source: New York legislative voting record on A 8354
, Jun 24, 2011
Supports constitutional amendment defining marriage
Zeldin indicates support of the following principles regarding employment & social issues: - Reduce government regulation of the private sector.
- Encourage employers to offer child care services, flex-time, & unpaid leave for family emergencies.
- Include gender identity in federal anti-discrimination laws.
- Q: Should same-sex couples be allowed to marry?
A: No. - Q: Do you support a federal constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman?
A: Yes.
Source: New York Congressional 2008 Political Courage Test
, Nov 1, 2008
Continue affirmative action programs
Q: Should the federal government consider race and gender in government contracting decisions?A: Yes.
Q: Should the federal government continue affirmative action programs?
A: Yes.
Source: New York Congressional 2008 Political Courage Test
, Nov 1, 2008
Don't elevate gender identity as a protected class.
Zeldin voted YEA H.Amdt. 1128 to H.R. 5055
Heritage Action Summary: The Maloney Amendment would ratify President Obama`s 2014 executive order barring federal contractors from what it describes as `discrimination` on the basis of `sexual orientation and gender identity` in their private employment policies. In practice, it would have required federal contractors to grant biologically male employees who identify as women unfettered access to women`s lockers, showers, and bathrooms.
Heritage Foundation recommendation to vote NO: (5/25/2016): Congress should not be elevating sexual orientation and gender identity as a protected class garnering special legal privileges, which is the intent of the Maloney Amendment. The Maloney Amendment constitutes bad policy that unnecessarily regulates businesses. It risks undoing longstanding protections in civil rights law and makes clear that the president`s orders are not exempt from them.
ACLU recommendation to vote YES: (5/11/2016):
We see today claims to a right to discriminate--by refusing to provide services to LGBT people--based on religious objections. Claiming a right to discriminate in the name of religion is not new. In the 1960s, we saw objections to laws requiring integration in restaurants because of sincerely held beliefs that God wanted the races to be separate. We saw religiously affiliated universities refuse to admit students who engaged in interracial dating. In those cases, we recognized that requiring integration was not about violating religious liberty; it was about ensuring fairness. It`s no different today.
Religious freedom in America means that we all have a right to our religious beliefs, but this does not give us the right to use our religion to impose those beliefs on others.
Legislative outcome: Amendment passed by the House 223-195-15 4/26/16; overall bill H.R.5055 failed 112-305-16 on 5/26/2016
Source: Congressional vote 16-H5055 on May 25, 2016
Respect faith-based opposition to same-sex marriage.
Zeldin signed respecting faith-based opposition to same-sex marriage
Congressional Summary: The First Amendment Defense Act (FADA) prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that:
- marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or
- sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.
Legal Argument Opposed: [Secular.org]: `The stated purpose of FADA is to protect the tax-exempt status, government contract, or any other federal benefit of those who do not comply with the Supreme Court`s same-sex marriage ruling. This act`s true impact would allow for sweeping, taxpayer-funded discrimination against same-sex couples and their children--all under the guise of religious liberty. FADA would completely eviscerate the historic nondiscrimination Executive Order that President Obama signed last summer that prohibits federal contractors from
engaging in discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The First Amendment protects freedom of religion and freedom from religion, not the special privileges of the religiously affiliated at the expense of the fundamental rights of other Americans.`Political Argument Opposed: [ACLU, July 20, 2015]: The House of Representatives & leading anti-LGBT organizations are pushing a bill--disingenuously titled the First Amendment Defense Act--that would open the door to unprecedented taxpayer-funded discrimination against LGBT people, single mothers, and unmarried couples. This bill would
- allow federal contractors, including those that provide homeless shelters or drug treatment programs, to turn away LGBT people
- permit a university to fire an unmarried teacher simply for becoming pregnant
- permit federal employees to refuse to process tax returns, visa applications, or Social Security checks for all married same-sex couples
Source: H.R.2802 16-HR2802 on Jun 17, 2015
Keep deadline for ratifying Equal Rights Amendment.
Zeldin voted NAY Removing deadline for ERA ratification
H.J.Res.17: Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment: This joint resolution eliminates the deadline for the ratification of the ERA, which prohibits discrimination based on sex. The amendment was proposed to the states in House Joint Resolution 208 of the 92nd Congress, as agreed to in the Senate on March 22, 1972. The amendment shall be part of the Constitution whenever ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states.
Opinion to vote YES (Rep. Terri Sewell (D-AL-7): The ERA was first proposed in 1923, shortly after women gained the right to vote. [The original] 1979 deadline was later extended before it expired. By the end of 1982, 35 of the 38 required state legislatures had voted to ratify the ERA. Nevada ratified the ERA in 2017, Illinois in 2018 and, in January 2020, Virginia became the 38th and final state required to ratify it. If passed in the Senate, H.J. Res. 79 would remove the arbitrary 1982 deadline.
Opinion to vote NO (Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-CA-1): H. J. Res 17 would retroactively remove the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment. Regardless of your thoughts on the ERA, the deadline for the states to ratify the amendment expired four decades ago. By passing this resolution, House Democrats are virtue signaling and trying to take a shortcut around what is required in our constitutional amendment process. Those who want to pass an ERA will need to start this process from the beginning. Today`s vote mocks the intentionally high bar set by our Founders to make changes to our precious Constitution.
Legislative Outcome: Passed House 222-204-4 on 03/17/2021; received in the Senate and read on 3/23. [OnTheIssues notes on the duration for ratification that the 27th Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed by Congress in 1789 and was ratified by 3/4 of the States and became law in 1992, a ratification period of 202 years].
Source: Congressional vote 21-HJR17 on Jan 21, 2021
- Click here for definitions & background information
on Civil Rights.
- Click here for a summary of all issue stances
of Lee Zeldin.
- Click here for a Wikipedia profile
of Lee Zeldin.
- Click here for a Ballotpedia profile
of Lee Zeldin.
- Click here for VoteMatch responses
by Lee Zeldin.
- Click here for issue positions of
other NY politicians.
- Click here for
NY primary archives.
- Click here for
NY secondary archives.
Other governors on Civil Rights: |
Lee Zeldin on other issues: |
NY Gubernatorial: Andrew Giuliani Joe Pinion Larry Sharpe Letitia James Rob Astorino Tom Suozzi NY Senatorial: Antoine Tucker Charles Schumer Joe Pinion Josh Eisen Kirsten Gillibrand Mike Sapraicone
|
Gubernatorial races 2025:
New Jersey Governor:
Democratic primary June 10, 2025:
- Ras Baraka, Mayor of Newark (2014-present)
- Steven Fulop, Mayor of Jersey City (2013-present)
- Josh Gottheimer, U.S. Rep. NJ-5 (since 2017)
- Mikie Sherrill, U.S. Rep. NJ-11 (since 2019)
- Stephen Sweeney, N.J.Senate President (2010-2022)
Republican primary June 10, 2025:
- Jon Bramnick, State Senator (since 2022); Minority Leader (2012-2022)
- Jack Ciattarelli, State Assemblyman (2011-2018), governor nominee (2021)
- Edward Durr, State Senator 3rd district (2022-2024); withdrew
Virginia Governor:
Democratic primary June 17 cancelled:
- Abigail Spanberger, U.S.Rep., VA-7 (2019-2024); Dem. nominee 2025
- Levar Stoney, VA Secretary of the Commonwealth (2014-2016); (withdrew to run for Lt. Gov.)
Republican primary June 17 cancelled:
- Winsome Earle-Sears, Lt. Gov. since 2022; GOP nominee 2025
- Amanda Chase, State Senate District 11 (2016-2023); failed to make ballot
- Denver Riggleman, U.S.Rep. (R-VA-5); exploratory committee as Independent
- Glenn Youngkin, Incumbent Governor , (2022-2025), term-limited
|
Mayoral races 2025:
NYC Mayor Democratic primary June 24, 2025:
- Adrienne Adams, speaker of the City Council
- Andrew Cuomo, former governor of New York, 2011-2021.
Republican June 24 primary cancelled; general election Nov. 4:
- Eric Adams, incumbent Democratic mayor running as an independent
- Jim Walden, Independent; Former assistant U.S. Attorney
- Curtis Sliwa, Republican; CEO of the Guardian Angels
Jersey City Mayor (Non-partisan)
Non-partisan general election Nov. 4:
- Mussab Ali, former president of the Jersey City Board of Education
- Bill O'Dea, Hudson County commissioner (since 1997)
- Jim McGreevey, former N.J. Governor (2002-2004)
- James Solomon, city councilor (since 2017)
- Joyce Watterman, president of the Jersey City Council (since 2023)
Oakland CA Mayor
Non-partisan special election April 14, 2025:
- Barbara Lee, U.S.Rep CA-12 (1998-2025)
- Loren Taylor, Oakland City Council (2019-2023), lost general election
- Sheng Thao, Oakland Mayor, lost recall election Nov. 5, 2024
|
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families/Children
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Infrastructure/Technology
Jobs
Local Issues
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty
[Title9]
|
| |
Page last updated: Sep 07, 2025; copyright 1999-2022 Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org