Michael Peroutka on Social Security

Constitution Party nominee for President

Mandatory Social Security is unconstitutional

On Social Security: "The federal government must honor its obligations to those who have contributed to the system. But no more should social security be mandatory; providing retirement benefits is not constitutional." Source: Vote-smart's NPAT 2004 presidential quiz Mar 15, 2004

Click here for definitions & background information on Social Security. Click here for policy papers on Social Security. Click here for a profile of Michael Peroutka. Click here for VoteMatch responses by Michael Peroutka. Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Social Security or about Michael Peroutka in The Forum.
*Other candidates on Social Security:*	*Michael Peroutka on other issues:*
George W. Bush Dick Cheney John Edwards John Kerry *Third Party Candidates:* Michael Baradnik Peter Camejo David Cobb Ralph Nader Michael Peroutka *Democratic Primaries:* Carol Moseley Braun Wesley Clark Howard Dean Dick Gephardt Bob Graham Dennis Kucinich Joe Lieberman Al Sharpton	Abortion Budget/Economy Civil Rights Corporations Crime Drugs Education Energy/Oil Environment Families/Children Foreign Policy Free Trade Govt. Reform Gun Control Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Infrastructure/Technology Jobs Principles/Values Social Security Tax Reform War/Iraq/Mideast Welfare/Poverty
Adv: Avi Green for State Rep Middlesex 26, Somerville & Cambridge Massachusetts