Search for...
Follow @ontheissuesorg
OnTheIssuesLogo

Tea Party on Education

 


Vouchers give students and parents the power of choice

The DC Opportunity Scholarship Program (DC OSP) was the 1st federally funded voucher program in America. It gave low-income parents $7,500 a year to choose the best education for their children. It transformed parents and students into customers with the power to exercise choice. And, like most customers, these parents shopped around. They exercised their choice. And it worked. Kids who failed in public schools succeeded in private and charter schools that were chosen by their parents--at less than 1/3 of the cost.

One would think that if something was generating success in its own backyard, the US government would support it.

Wrong.

Instead of supporting the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program, the [Obama Administration] eliminated funding for new students who wanted to enter the program.

Fortunately, in March 2011, a Republican-sponsored bill to restore and enhance the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program passed--over the objections of the White House and the Democratic Party.

Source: Tea Party Patriots, by M.Meckler & J.B.Martin, p.118-119 , Feb 14, 2012

Shut down failing schools; end collective bargaining

We offer the Tea Party Patriots' Path to Educational Liberty. Here are the philosophical foundations upon which our practical ideas will stand. We the People believe that:
Source: Tea Party Patriots, by M.Meckler & J.B.Martin, p.127 , Feb 14, 2012

Vouchers work: Schools either get better, or they close

The debate over whether vouchers work is effectively over. They do. They may not work for teachers' unions or the entrenched educational bureaucracies of municipal school systems, but they're tremendously effective for students.

But we think it's important to reflect for a moment on why vouchers work. By giving parents more educational purchasing power, we enable them to serve as consumers and exercise their demand for better schools. The demand-side results are immediate--when parents get to choose between sending their kids to failing local schools or succeeding local schools, they obviously choose the ones that succeed. One of two things happens to the unsuccessful schools--either they get better, or they close--and each is a perfectly acceptable option.

Source: Tea Party Patriots, by M.Meckler & J.B.Martin, p.142 , Feb 14, 2012

College kids should get jobs, not Food Stamps

Young adults in college are not exempt from Tea Party suspicion. Montana GOP Congressman Denny Rehberg, a Tea Party favorite, was no doubt speaking to the choir when he recently denounced aid to college students as "the welfare of the 21st century." A similar point was made in an April 2010 blog posting on the Greater Boston Tea Party website, claiming that college kids are taking advantage of the Food Stamp program. "Call me crazy," the blogger opined, "but when I needed money for college, I got a job." The limited economic opportunities available to young people were not something Tea Party members mentioned to us. Nor did they express any concern about declining college attendance and completion for lower-income and lower-middle-income young people--a decline that has caused the US to fall behind in the global higher education sweepstakes. Instead, Tea Partiers condemned the behavior of the young in moral terms.
Source: The Remaking of Republican Conservatism, p. 73-74 , Jan 2, 2012

Dismiss objectionable intellectuals as over-educated elites

Although Tea Partiers dismiss intellectuals with harsh rhetoric, they are themselves usually well educated. Most of those we spoke to had a college education, and many had advanced degrees. One Tea Partier objected to a brief written survey we had provided, saying it did not allow her to list her full academic credentials. As with those deemed undeserving, the category of the "intellectual elite" is more politically symbolic than based on clear-cut empirical facts. In Tea Partyland, ideology and politics separate objectionable educated elites from other highly educated people.

Because of their supposed disdain for average Americans, liberal elites are imagined to be plotting new forms of regulation and control. They think "they know what's best for us," one Virginia Tea Partier explained. Regulations supported by liberals are perceived as a foreign moral code, an imposition of un-American ideals.

Source: The Remaking of Republican Conservatism, p. 80 , Jan 2, 2012

  • Click here for definitions & background information for the Education.
  • Click here for VoteMatch responses for the Tea Party.
Other political parties on Education: Tea Party on other issues:
Political Parties:
Democratic Party
Republican Party
Libertarian Party
Green Party
Reform Party
Natural Law Party
Tea Party

Former Presidents:
George W. Bush(R,2001-2009)
Bill Clinton(D,1993-2001)
George Bush Sr.(R,1989-1993)
Ronald Reagan(R,1981-1989)
Jimmy Carter(D,1977-1981)
Gerald Ford(R,1974-1977)
Richard Nixon(R,1969-1974)
Lyndon Johnson(D,1963-1969)
John F. Kennedy(D,1961-1963)

Political Thinkers:
American Civil Liberties Union
Noam Chomsky
Milton Friedman
Heritage Foundation
Arianna Huffington
Rush Limbaugh
Ayn Rand
Secy.Robert Reich
Donald Trump
Gov.Jesse Ventura
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families/Children
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Infrastructure/Technology
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty

Page last updated: Mar 15, 2014