State of Nebraska Archives: on Social Security


Jane Raybould: Fight against reductions in benefits

There is nothing more important to our senior citizens, and those who will be retiring soon, than Social Security and Medicare. Hard-working Nebraskans deserve to retire at a reasonable age and collect the benefits they've faithfully paid into for decades.

Social Security can last--but only if it's properly taken care of. Jane will fight for Social Security reform, and fight against reductions in benefits, so we can keep our promise to seniors who have worked hard and played by the rules.

Medicare is a lifeline for so many Nebraskans, and we must fight to protect it. As the cost of health insurance and health care rises, seniors are particularly impacted-- more can be done to help those who have contributed to the program and earned their benefits. Slashing funding for Medicare is the last thing Nebraskans need.

Source: 2018 Nebraska Senatorial campaign site JaneRaybould.com Mar 31, 2018

Don Bacon: Adjust long-term policies for future generations

Don does not support altering or reducing Social Security for those who are currently in or near retirement. With the average life expectancy increasing in the United States, Mr. Bacon believes we should consider the possibility of adjusting current long-term policies to ensure the viability of Social Security for future generations. The program will eventually go bankrupt if no adjustments are made.
Source: 2016 Nebraska House campaign website DonBacon2016.com Nov 8, 2016

Dave Domina: It's not an entitlement; and it shouldn't be privatized

Q: How would you protect Social Security for today's seniors and strengthen it for future generations?

A: Domina said Social Security's earning cap is too low. He said Social Security should not be called an "entitlement" and the program should not be cut or privatized. "It is a promise that was made to the people of the United States," Domina said. "It was earned by many who count on it. It must be protected."

Source: AARP Voter Guide on 2014 Nebraska Senate race Aug 31, 2014

Dave Domina: Keep promises made to the elderly

Nebraska's U.S. Senate candidates promised to offer strongly divergent views of the federal government during the five months leading up to the November election. And they began by addressing gay marriage, the federal health care law and other issues.

It was the first official meeting since the primary election between Democrat Dave Domina and Republican Ben Sasse. The forum at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln was held in front of high school juniors attending American Legion Cornhusker Boys and Girls State.

Domina, a lawyer, said his campaign will focus on keeping promises made to veterans, the elderly and others through programs such as Social Security, Medicare and veterans' benefits plans. "We have sharp differences, Mr. Sasse and I, on each and every one of those points," Domina said.

Sasse, the president of Midland University, said politicians have overpromised, and it's time to talk about how those promises "fundamentally didn't add up."

Source: Omaha World-Herald on 2014 Nebraska Senate debate Jun 2, 2014

Ben Sasse: Entitlement reform needed: guilty of generational theft

The Republican candidates gave a glimpse during the first debate of the campaign of their plans to get the federal budget under control. Ben Sasse says entitlement reform is the only way to achieve fiscal stability. Shane Osborn says the nation can grow its way out of its fiscal woes by expanding the economy.

The candidates were asked how they would work with Democrats to reduce the deficit. Sasse, a former top health and human services aide under President George W. Bush, said both Democrats and Republicans in Washington have to understand that much of the nation's debt is the result of the growth in entitlements. However, Sasse did not say what entitlements he would cut or how he would go about changing Social Security and Medicare. "We're guilty of generational theft," said Sasse, president of Midland University in Fremont.

Osborn also indicated that he would support entitlement changes, but he did not give any specifics.

Source: Omaha World-Herald on 2014 Nebraska Senate debate Jan 29, 2014

Bob Kerrey: We must keep our commitments & do right for the future

FISCHER: I believe that we cannot change the benefits for people over the age of 40. But maybe those under 40 need to look at means testing, maybe we need to look at changing the age of eligibility--then our younger citizens can make plans.

KERREY: What she's saying, basically, is that if you're over 40, you're not going to have to participate in the solution. The question is not: Are we going to keep our commitments? But the question is: Are we going to do the right thing for our future? The most moving moment of my political career was in Lincoln, Nebraska, on 6 June 1994, with men who had landed on the beaches of Normandy 50 years earlier. And we celebrated them as heroes, not because they avoided risk but because they took risks. And the question is: Are we going to be remembered in the same fashion? And if we do it the way Senator Fischer is talking about, I promise you, we won't.

FISCHER: Well, I wasn't in government when those commitments were made.

Source: 2012 Nebraska Senate debate excerpts Sep 28, 2012

Bob Kerrey: Entitlements are $60 trillion liability; must do something

FISCHER: When I made a commitment [like on Social Security] that meant I was going to keep it. That meant that I was hoping the people that came after me and served in the Legislature would keep that commitment also. I can tell you what I won't do, though. I will not cut benefits, I will not raise taxes, and I won't steal $700 billion from Medicare.

KERREY: We've got a commitment we can't fund. And it's simple math. It's a $60 trillion unfunded liability with $400,000 worth of debt for every single person in the workforce. We made a commitment that we can't keep. And the question is, what are we going to do about it? And if we don't do something about it, we'll end up like Greece relatively soon.

Source: 2012 Nebraska Senate debate excerpts Sep 28, 2012

Bob Kerrey: Raise payroll cap & raise retirement age to 69

Deb Fischer and Bob Kerrey agreed that the government must transform its entitlement programs, including scaling back Social Security, but Kerrey charged that Fischer's plan for cutting federal spending was impractical and would cause serious damage to the economy.

The two also disagreed on how to reform federal programs like Social Security and Medicare. Kerrey's plan would expand the payroll tax to higher income levels and would gradually increase the age of eligibility for benefits to 69 in 2075. Fischer's plan would increase the retirement age for people who are now younger than 40 and would limit benefits for the wealthy.

Kerrey said "there's a grain of truth" in comments that America has become an entitlement nation. While he doesn't view Social Security and Medicare beneficiaries as "moochers," Kerrey said, those programs amount to a $60 trillion unfunded liability that works out to "$400,000 worth of debt for every person in the workforce."

Source: Beatrice Daily Sun on 2012 Nebraska Senate debate Sep 28, 2012

Deb Fischer: Don't change benefits for people over the age of 40

FISCHER: I believe that we cannot change the benefits for people over the age of 40. We need to be honest with our younger citizens in this country. They all know, you all know, that the programs you have aren't sustainable. But if the government is honest with you, saying that things need to change--that maybe those under 40 need to look at means testing, maybe we need to look at changing the age of eligibility--then our younger citizens can make plans. But we need to have a government that's honest.

KERREY: What she's saying, basically, is that if you're over 40, you're not going to have to participate in the solution. The question is not: Are we going to keep our commitments? But the question is: Are we going to do the right thing for our future?

Source: 2012 Nebraska Senate debate excerpts Sep 28, 2012

Deb Fischer: Raise retirement age & limit benefits

Fischer and Kerrey agreed that the government must transform its entitlement programs, including scaling back Social Security, but Kerrey charged that Fischer's plan for cutting federal spending was impractical and would cause serious damage to the economy.

The two also disagreed on how to reform federal programs like Social Security and Medicare. Kerrey's plan would expand the payroll tax to higher income levels and would gradually increase the age of eligibility for benefits to 69 in 2075. Fischer's plan would increase the retirement age for people who are now younger than 40 and would limit benefits for the wealthy.

Both candidates strived to take cautious, balanced positions when asked whether America has become an entitlement nation. Fischer distanced herself from Mitt Romney's statement in which he said 47% of Americans don't pay income taxes and many feel entitled to government support; Fischer said, "People sometimes need help and government should be there for them."

Source: Beatrice Daily Sun on 2012 Nebraska Senate debate Sep 28, 2012

Deb Fischer: Look at means testing & higher retirement age

Kerrey said he supports the federal health care reform enacted in 2010 and knows it is unpopular with many Nebraskans. He said those people should vote for Fischer.

Fischer spoke about possible changes to Social Security, while noting many lawmakers won't take a stand on the topic. "We need to look at means testing. We need to look at (raising) the eligibility age," she said.

Source: Sioux City Journal on 2012 Nebraska Senate debate May 17, 2012

Scott Kleeb: Strengthen, not privatize, Social Security

Source: Campaign booklet, Nebraska’s Brand of Change, p.37 Aug 19, 2008

Steven Larrick: Increase Social Security tax on higher income individuals

Source: Nebraska Congressional Election 2008 Political Courage Test Jun 25, 2008

Mike Johanns: Honor our commitment on Social Security

We must honor our commitment to those currently receiving Social Security and future recipients. We must also continue to help those who rely on the benefits provided by Medicare and Medicaid. Democrats and Republicans must work together for a bi-partisan reform to ensure the continued viability of these important programs.
Source: Nebraska Congressional Election 2008 Political Courage Test Jun 3, 2008

  • The above quotations are from State of Nebraska Politicians: Archives.
  • Click here for definitions & background information on Social Security.
  • Click here for other issues (main summary page).
2020 Presidential contenders on Social Security:
  Democrats running for President:
Sen.Michael Bennet (D-CO)
V.P.Joe Biden (D-DE)
Mayor Mike Bloomberg (I-NYC)
Gov.Steve Bullock (D-MT)
Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D-IN)
Sen.Cory Booker (D-NJ)
Secy.Julian Castro (D-TX)
Gov.Lincoln Chafee (L-RI)
Rep.John Delaney (D-MD)
Rep.Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI)
Sen.Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
Gov.Deval Patrick (D-MA)
Sen.Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
CEO Tom Steyer (D-CA)
Sen.Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
Marianne Williamson (D-CA)
CEO Andrew Yang (D-NY)

2020 Third Party Candidates:
Rep.Justin Amash (L-MI)
CEO Don Blankenship (C-WV)
Gov.Lincoln Chafee (L-RI)
Howie Hawkins (G-NY)
Gov.Gary Johnson(L-NM)
Howard Schultz(I-WA)
Gov.Jesse Ventura (I-MN)
Republicans running for President:
Sen.Ted Cruz(R-TX)
Gov.Larry Hogan (R-MD)
Gov.John Kasich(R-OH)
V.P.Mike Pence(R-IN)
Gov.Mark Sanford (R-SC)
Pres.Donald Trump(R-NY)
Rep.Joe Walsh (R-IL)
Gov.Bill Weld(R-MA & L-NY)

2020 Withdrawn Democratic Candidates:
Sen.Stacey Abrams (D-GA)
Mayor Bill de Blasio (D-NYC)
Sen.Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
Sen.Mike Gravel (D-AK)
Sen.Kamala Harris (D-CA)
Gov.John Hickenlooper (D-CO)
Gov.Jay Inslee (D-WA)
Mayor Wayne Messam (D-FL)
Rep.Seth Moulton (D-MA)
Rep.Beto O`Rourke (D-TX)
Rep.Tim Ryan (D-CA)
Adm.Joe Sestak (D-PA)
Rep.Eric Swalwell (D-CA)
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: May 30, 2022