|
Joe Walsh on Free Trade
Republican presidential primary challenger (former IL Rep.)
|
|
Everybody loses in a trade war with China
Walsh's comments on China have focused on criticizing Trump's trade war and advocating for free trade. He opposes Trump's escalating tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Chinese imports, arguing that "everybody loses in a trade war."
He says that the tariffs amount to a tax increase on the middle class and that Beijing's retaliation is "devastating to our farmers." He calls Trump's claim that tariffs are paid by for by China "absurd."
Source: Council on Foreign Relations on 2020 presidential hopefuls
, Dec 24, 2019
Supports a free trade system; opposes tariffs on China
On trade:- Walsh supports a free trade system and came out strongly against Trump's trade war with China and his decision to raise tariffs.
- Walsh has also said Trump is "clueless" on trade.
- At Business Insider's Republican debate,
Walsh blasted Trump's trade war and tariffs on China as damaging to the American economy.
- He also vowed to undo the tariffs if he were elected.
Source: Business Insider background for 2019 GOP presidential debate
, Sep 24, 2019
China cheats world, so deal with them with world coalition
Q: Some economists blame the slowing economy on Trump's trade war with China. Without tariffs, how do you change that relationship?Joe Walsh: China cheats but they don't just cheat against us. They cheat against the whole world.
And they've been doing it for a long time. So in comes Trump, and throws down tariffs against everybody and he goes at China all by himself. And so who pays the price? We do: our farmers, small business, and American consumers.
The mistake Trump made, is he put us out there on an island all by ourselves. Instead of rallying the whole world--getting us back in the
Trans-Pacific Partnership, where we could have a coalition of countries that could deal with China--he's done it all by himself. And America has paid a big, big price for that. You got to bring the world together to fight China.
Source: Business Insider 2019 GOP presidential primary debate
, Sep 24, 2019
Tariffs are a tax increase on middle-class Americans
Walsh wrote that Trump "abuses the Constitution for his narcissistic trade war. In private, most congressional Republicans oppose the trade war, but they don't say anything publicly."
Walsh, who has come under criticism from listeners for espousing anti-Trump views on his radio show, called out the Republican Party for supporting a president whose tariffs amount to a "tax increase on middle-class
Americans and are devastating to our farmers."
"That's not a smart electoral strategy," he warned fellow conservatives. "It's one of the many reasons
Mr. Trump is ripe for a primary challenger. In fact, it would buck the historical trend if he didn't have one. More often than not, unpopular presidents face primary challengers."
Source: Salon.com on 2020 presidential hopefuls
, Aug 16, 2019
Rated 63% by the USAE, indicating a mixed record on trade.
Walsh scores 63% by USA*Engage on trade issues
Ratings by USA*Engage indicate support for trade engagement or trade sanctions. The organization's self-description: "USA*Engage is concerned about the proliferation of unilateral foreign policy sanctions at the federal, state and local level. Despite the fact that broad trade-based unilateral sanctions rarely achieve our foreign policy goals, they continue to have political appeal. Unilateral sanctions give the impression that the United States is 'doing something,' while American workers, farmers and businesses absorb the costs."
USA*Engage at Work- Developing the Case: USA*Engage explains the benefits of economic engagement, and the high cost of sanctions for American exports, investment and jobs.
- Education: We recruit respected foreign policy and economic experts to speak out against sanctions, actively engage the media and provide outreach to key target states and Congressional districts.
- Contacting Government Officials: USA*Engage directly contacts Congressional, Administration, state and local officials.
VoteMatch scoring for the USA*Engage ratings is as follows :
- 0%-49%: supports trade sanctions;
- 50%-74%: mixed record on trade engagement;
- 75%-100%: supports trade engagement.
Source: USA*Engage 2011-2012 ratings on Congress and politicians 2012-USAE on Dec 31, 2012
Page last updated: Feb 25, 2020