OnTheIssuesLogo

Nikki Haley on Technology

 

 


Full disclosure on Big Tech algorithms & bots

Q: You floated the idea of social media companies verifying all users by name. Will you commit to being principled on free speech? Meaning supporting even that speech that you disagree with?

HALEY: I will always fight for freedom of speech. What I was referring to when it comes to our tech companies is there is a responsibility that our social media companies have. What I think they should do is they should show us their algorithms. They should be completely transparent so that you know why they push what they push, why you see what you see, all of that. That's a business transparency situation. When it comes to disclosing who you are, I'm not saying that Americans have to disclose their name. What I'm saying is you have millions of foreign bots, where there are no people behind them. There are millions of bots that are spreading disinformation, that are sowing division in our country. And what I'm saying is those social media companies have to do something with the foreign bots.

Source: CNN Town Hall: interviews of 2024 presidential candidates , Jan 18, 2024

A.I. can be dangerous, but enforce law instead of regulating

Q: What is your plan to deal with the loss of jobs that are being replaced by AI?

HALEY: When you look at artificial intelligence, don't look at it as good or bad. See it as opportunities, but also see it as a warning. When you look at artificial intelligence, a lot of good could come from it: innovations, whether it's in health care, whether it's in education, whether it's in creating the next new industry. When you create a platform like that, it always creates more jobs along the way. But there are some warning signs that, if we don't deal with it the right way, could be incredibly dangerous. So, the first thing is, let's look at the security perspective. I don't think you regulate AI. I am not a fan of government regulating anything. I think they tend to break more than they fix. I do think we need to put laws in place to protect Americans, laws that say, if you use A.I. to steal a person's identity, that's against the law.

Source: CNN Town Hall: interviews of 2024 presidential candidates , Jan 18, 2024

Freedom of speech for Americans, not bots on social media

Q: What about the requirement that every anonymous internet user needs to out themselves?

Vivek RAMASWAMY: Nikki Haley says that every American needs to be doxxed by having their ID tied to what they say on the internet. The only person more fascist than the Biden regime now is Nikki Haley. You can put lipstick on a Dick Cheney; it is still a fascist neocon.

Gov. Nikki Haley: What I said was that social media companies need to show us their algorithms. There are millions of bots on social media right now. They're foreign; they're Chinese; they're Iranian, I will always fight for freedom of speech for Americans. We do not need freedom of speech for Russians and Iranians. We need social media companies to fight back on all of these bots. As a mom, do I think that social media would be more civil if we went and had people's names next to that? Yes, I do think that because I think we've got too much cyber bullying & child pornography, but I never said government should require anyone's name.

Source: NewsNation 2023 Republican primary debate in Alabama , Dec 6, 2023

Anti-Zionism is part of anti-Semitism, and so is TikTok

Q: Asked whether pro-Palestinian protestors calling for the genocide of the Jews would violate school policies against harassment and intimidation, three college presidents said it would depend on the context--do you agree?

Nikki Haley: If this had been the KKK that was doing protests on those campuses, every one of those college presidents would've been up in arms. This is just as bad. That kind of pro-Hamas protest--or genocide of Jews--to say that they needed context on that, there is no context to that. Biden made a mistake not including anti-Zionism in the definition of anti-Semitism. If you don't think that Israel has a right to exist, that is anti-Semitic. We will change the definition so that every government, every school has to acknowledge the definition for what it is. We really do need to ban TikTok, and let me tell you why. For every 30 minutes that someone watches TikTok, every day, they become 17% more anti-Semitic, more pro-Hamas based on doing that.

Source: NewsNation 2023 Republican primary debate in Alabama , Dec 6, 2023

China gets data from 150M people on TikTok

Q [to Vivek RAMASWAMY]: TikTok is banned on government-issued devices because of its ties to the Chinese government. Yet you met with TikTok [influencers]?

RAMASWAMY: The Republican Party [needs to] reach the next generation of young Americans where they are. [And we should] declare independence from China.

HALEY: This is infuriating because TikTok is one of the most dangerous social media apps that we could have. 150 million people are on TikTok. That means [China] can get your contacts. They can get your financial information. They can get your e-mails. They can get text messages. They can get all of these things. China knows exactly what they are doing. You want China to go make medicines in China, not America? You now wanted kids to go and get on this social media that's dangerous for all of us? You were in business with the Chinese that gave Hunter Biden $5 million. We can't trust you. We can't have TikTok.

Source: Fox Business 2023 Republican primary debate in Simi Valley , Sep 27, 2023

Guardrails for artificial intelligence--not heavy regulation

Artificial intelligence is happening whether we like it or not. The first thing is, you have to acknowledge this is real, and it can be a source for good, right? This is something that's going to move us over to the -- you know, to the next level when it comes to all types of things. What we need to do is not heavily regulated, but we need to have guardrails, right? And so if you look, the Europeans are already on to it, the Chinese are already on to it. What we don't want is for them to leave us.
Source: CNN Town Hall: interviews of 2024 presidential candidates , Jun 4, 2023

Invest in infrastructure, but no gas tax or any other tax

Infrastructure must remain a priority. We know there's more work to be done. You might ask the question, "How do we pay for it?" And my answer will be, "Not by hiking taxes."

We proved last year that we can invest in our roads and bridges with the dollars we already have. Raising the gas tax--forcing our people and our businesses to pay more for the simple act of getting around--is not an option for me.

I will veto any bill that reaches my desk that raises taxes on gasoline.

So instead, this year, as last, our budget writers should take the additional revenue that inevitably appears after our budget is balanced--what I call "the money tree,"--and invest it in our infrastructure. Since 2005, the "money tree" that falls every year has averaged more than $106 million. According to the Department of Transportation, those dollars, invested the right way, will be worth more than $1.3 billion in additional road and bridge improvements. That is prioritizing. That is our job.

Source: 2014 South Carolina State of the State Address , Jan 22, 2014

Address our crumbling infrastructure

We have to address our crumbling infrastructure. Our roads, our bridges--they simply aren't up to standard. More than 1,000 of South Carolina's bridges are either load-restricted or structurally deficient.

First and foremost, it's a public safety issue. The citizens of South Carolina deserve to drive on roads that aren't littered with potholes and on bridges they know won't fall down.

It's a core function of government. But it's also an economic development issue. South Carolina has announced our self as the new superstar of American manufacturing. We build things. We build planes. We build cars. We build tires. We need roads and bridges that match the quality of the companies that manufacture in our great state. And we will get them.

Source: 2013 State of the State address to S. C. Legislature , Jan 16, 2013

More cybersecurity against international criminal hacking

Plenty has been said and written about the international criminal hacking that took place at DOR--I'm not here to rehash that or to look backwards, except to say this: when it comes to data security, the state of South Carolina should have done better in the past and will do better in the future.

That does not mean that we will be 100% protected. The toughest lesson I have learned is that in today's world there is no such thing as absolute security. That is true for conventional terrorism and homeland security threats, and it is true for cyberterrorism and cybersecurity threats. It's a hard reality, but reality nonetheless.

What it does mean is that we will do everything we can to make sure that no state in the country has better security measures in place than we do. We are encrypting all personal and sensitive data. We are segmenting our networks to make sure that our most sensitive information is protected separately and securely.

Source: 2013 State of the State address to S. C. Legislature , Jan 16, 2013

Deepen the port of Charleston; return to greatness

Our ports are vital. No one will work harder to get the funding necessary to deepen the Port of Charleston--starting with the creation of a port infrastructure fund in this year's executive budget. Part of South Carolina's advantage in recruiting industry is the Port of Charleston. It is a huge part of why companies like Bridgestone & Michelin come to and expand in our state. From the first day of our Administration, I have worked with our federal delegation to clear away all of the impediments to making Charleston the premier port in the southeast--starting with getting the port to the depth of 50 feet. There has been much discussion about DHEC's decision and whether two viable ports in the region are good or bad for the economics of S.C. businesses and our state. I am not afraid of a 48-foot Georgia port, 36 miles up the Savannah River, confined to one-way traffic. You should not be either. Let's quit bickering and work together to see Charleston return to its greatness.
Source: 2012 S.C. State of the State Address , Jan 18, 2012

Other candidates on Technology: Nikki Haley on other issues:
2024 Republican Presidential Candidates:
Ryan Binkley (R-TX)
Gov. Doug Burgum (R-ND)
Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ)
Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL)
Larry Elder (R-CA;withdrew)
Gov. Nikki Haley (R-SC)
Rep. Will Hurd (R-FL;withdrew)
Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R-AR)
Perry Johnson (R-IL)
Mayor Steve Laffey (R-RI)
Former V.P.Mike Pence (R-IN;withdrew)
Vivek Ramaswamy (R-OH)
Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC)
Secy. Corey Stapleton (R-MT)
Mayor Francis Suarez (R-FL;withdrew)
Former Pres.Donald Trump (R-NY)

2024 Democratic and 3rd-party primary candidates:
Pres. Joe Biden (D-DE)
V.P.Kamala Harris (D-CA)
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (I-NY)
Chase Oliver (L-GA)
Rep.Dean Phillips (D-MN)
Jill Stein (Green)
Cornel West (Green Party)
Kanye West (Birthday Party)
Marianne Williamson (D-CA)
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families/Children
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Infrastructure/Technology
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty

External Links about Nikki Haley:
Wikipedia
Ballotpedia





Page last updated: Feb 16, 2024; copyright 1999-2022 Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org