Barack Obama on Abortion Democratic President (2009-2017); IL Senator (2004-2008)

Sub-sections under Abortion:
• Voting Record
• Other issues under Abortion

Teen pregnancies and abortions are nearing all-time lows

ObamaCare asks insurance companies to provide contraceptives

Insurers must provide contraception, but not employers

This week, he tried to end the debate with what he called an "accommodation." The employees still will be offered free birth-control coverage, but the benefit will come directly from their insurers, and no religious groups' money will be used.

The question now is whether the maneuver will tamp down the political fire. He appeared to have made progress, winning over the Catholic hospital association and Catholic Charities--although not the nation's bishops.

Evidence suggests that insurers will comply because providing birth-control coverage reduces overall costs (birth control is much cheaper than pregnancy). Obama waded into the details of the dispute himself and personally crafted the solution.

Catholic Bishops rejected segregated abortion funds

Shortly before the House bill reached the floor, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops rejected a compromise worked out by Congresswoman Lois Capps that would have segregated private funds for abortions from public money on a future health exchange. The bishops called that "money laundering."

2007 bill: discount contraceptives at college health clinics

The liberal media hailed the measure as a victory for women's rights. Other standard media accounts claimed the measure "will allow pharmaceutical companies to once again supply college-health clinics with discounted birth-control pills and other contraceptives."

But this is misleading. There was no law keeping drug makers from selling their contraceptives to college students at discounted prices--known as "nominal pricing." The problem for the drug makers was that, under a 2005 law, if drug makers offered students a discount on contraceptives, they would also have to slightly discount the same drug to Medicaid. Thanks to Pres. Obama, they aren't "penalized" by Medicare anymore for offering college discounts.

No litmus test; nominate to Court based on their fairness

McCAIN: I would never, and have never in all the years I’ve been there, imposed a litmus test on any nominee to the Court. That’s not appropriate to do.

OBAMA: Well, I think it’s true that we shouldn’t apply a strict litmus test and the most important thing in any judge is their capacity to provide fairness and justice to the American people. And it is true that this is going to be, I think, one of the most consequential decisions of the next president. It is very likely that one of us will be making at least one and probably more than one appointments and Roe vs. Wade probably hangs in the balance. I will look for those judges who have an outstanding judicial record, who have the intellect, and who hopefully have a sense of what real-world folks are going through.

1990: Wrote law article that fetus cannot sue mother

The six-page summary considers the charged, if peripheral, question of whether fetuses should be able to file lawsuits against their mothers. Obama’s answer, like most courts’: No. He wrote approvingly of an Illinois Supreme Court ruling that the unborn cannot sue their mothers for negligence, and he suggested that allowing fetuses to sue would violate the mother’s rights and could, perversely, cause her to take more risks with her pregnancy.

Obama’s article, which begins on pg.823 of Vol.103 of the Harvard Law Review, is available in libraries.

FactCheck: Abortions HAVE gone down under Pres. Bush

This is an erroneous claim that we first tracked down and debunked more than three years ago when it was being repeated by Howard Dean and Hillary Clinton, among others.

The Guttmacher Institute, whose figures are cited regularly by both sides in the abortion debate, say on their Web site, “In 2005, 1.21 million abortions were performed, down from 1.31 million abortions in 2000.”

There’s little to show the decline has come about because of anything President Bush did or didn’t do. In fact, the number of abortions in the U.S. has been falling steadily since the 1980s regardless of whether the person in the White House favored a legal right to abortion or opposed it.

1997: opposed bill preventing partial-birth abortion

Opposed legislation protecting born-alive failed abortions

On March 30, 2001, Obama was the only Illinois senator who rose to speak against a bill that would have protected babies who survived late term labor-induced abortion. Obama rose to object that if the bill passed, and a nine-month-old fetus survived a late-term labor-induced abortion was deemed to be a person who had a right to live, then the law would "forbid abortions to take place." Obama further explained the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not allow somebody to kill a child, so if the law deemed a child who survived a late-term labor-induced abortion had a right to live, "then this would be an anti-abortion statute."

Ok for state to restrict late-term partial birth abortion

Part of the reason they didn’t have it was purposeful, because those who are opposed to abortion have a moral calling to try to oppose what they think is immoral. Oftentimes what they were trying to do was to polarize the debate and make it more difficult for people, so that they could try to bring an end to abortions overall.

As president, my goal is to bring people together, to listen to them, and I don’t think that’s any Republican out there who I’ve worked with who would say that I don’t listen to them, I don’t respect their ideas, I don’t understand their perspective. And my goal is to get us out of this polarizing debate where we’re always trying to score cheap political points and actually get things done.

We can find common ground between pro-choice and pro-life

A: I absolutely think we can find common ground. And it requires a couple of things. It requires us to acknowledge that..

1. There is a moral dimension to abortion, which I think that all too often those of us who are pro-choice have not talked about or tried to tamp down. I think that’s a mistake because I think all of us understand that it is a wrenching choice for anybody to think about.
2. People of good will can exist on both sides. That nobody wishes to be placed in a circumstance where they are even confronted with the choice of abortion. How we determine what’s right at that moment, I think, people of good will can differ.

Undecided on whether life begins at conception

A: This is something that I have not come to a firm resolution on. I think it’s very hard to know what that means, when life begins. Is it when a cell separates? Is it when the soul stirs? So I don’t presume to know the answer to that question. What I know is that there is something extraordinarily powerful about potential life and that that has a moral weight to it that we take into consideration when we’re having these debates.

Teach teens about abstinence and also about contraception

But we also recognize the importance of good medical care for women, that we’re also recognizing the importance of age-appropriate education to reduce risks. I do believe that contraception has to be part of that education process.

And if we do those things, then I think that we can reduce abortions and I think we should make sure that adoption is an option for people out there. If we put all of those things in place, then I think we will take some of the edge off the debate.

We’re not going to completely resolve it. At some point, there may just be an irreconcilable difference. And those who are opposed to abortion, I think, should continue to be able to lawfully object and try to change the laws.

GovWatch: Obama’s “present” votes were a requested strategy

The National Organization for Women has strongly endorsed Hillary Clinton for President. A chain e-mail denounced Obama’s record on abortion, citing his “present” votes on a succession of bills sponsored by anti-abortion activists.

The Facts: Under the rules of the Illinois legislature, only yes votes count toward passage of a bill. Planned Parenthood calculated that a ‘present’ vote by Obama would encourage other senators to cast a similar vote, rather than voting for the legislation [and asked Obama to vote ‘present’ as a strategy]. NOW never endorsed the Planne Parenthood strategy of voting ‘present,’ saying “They were horrible bills, and we wanted no votes.” Illinois NOW and Planned Parenthood had different voting strategies on the abortion issue. It was impossible for Obama to satisfy both groups at once.

Expand access to contraception; reduce unintended pregnancy

• Reproductive Choice: Obama has been a consistent champion of reproductive choice and will make preserving a women’s right to choose under Roe v. Wade a priority as president. Obama also supports expanded access to contraception, health information and preventive services to reduce unintended pregnancies.

• Protecting a Women’s Right to Choose: Obama will make safeguarding women’s rights under Roe v. Wade a priority. He opposes any constitutional amendment to overturn that decision.
• Reducing Unintended Pregnancy: Obama will work to reduce unintended pregnancy by guaranteeing equity in contraceptive coverage, providing sex education, and offering rape victims accurate information about emergency contraception.

• Throughout his career, in both the Illinois Senate & the US Senate, Obama has stood up for a women’s right to choose, consistently earning 100% ratings from pro-choice groups.

Stem cells hold promise to cure 70 major diseases

• Promote Embryonic Stem Cell Research
• Support Medical Advancement and Innovation
• Expand the Number of Stem Cell Lines Available for Research
• Ensure Ethical Standards

Trust women to make own decisions on partial-birth abortion

A: I think that most Americans recognize that this is a profoundly difficult issue for the women and families who make these decisions. They don’t make them casually. And I trust women to make these decisions in conjunction with their doctors and their families and their clergy. And I think that’s where most Americans are. Now, when you describe a specific procedure that accounts for less than 1% of the abortions that take place, then naturally, people get concerned, and I think legitimately so. But the broader issue here is: Do women have the right to make these profoundly difficult decisions? And I trust them to do it. There is a broader issue: Can we move past some of the debates around which we disagree and can we start talking about the things we do agree on? Reducing teen pregnancy; making it less likely for women to find themselves in these circumstances.

Extend presumption of good faith to abortion protesters

I told him I understood his position but had to disagree with it. I explained my belief that few women made the decision to terminate a pregnancy casually; that any pregnant woman felt the full force of the moral issues involved when making that decision; that I feared a ban on abortion would force women to seek unsafe abortions, as they had once done in this country. I suggested that perhaps we could agree on ways to reduce the number of women who felt the need to have abortions in the first place.

“I will pray for you,” the protester said. “I pray that you have a change of heart.” Neither my mind nor my heart changed that day, nor did they in the days to come. But that night, before I went to bed, I said a prayer of my own-that I might extend the same presumption of good faith to others that had been extended to me.

Constitution is a living document; no strict constructionism

Others, like Justice Breyer, insist that sometimes the original understanding can take you only so far--that on the truly big arguments, we have to take context, history, and the practical outcomes of a decision into account.

I have to side with Justice Breyer’s view of the Constitution--that it is not a static but rather a living document and must be read in the context of an ever-changing world.

I see democracy as a conversation to be had. According to this conception, the genius of Madison’s design is not that it provides a fixed blueprint for action. It provides us with a framework and rules, but all its machinery are designed to force us into a conversation.

Moral accusations from pro-lifers are counterproductive

KEYES: It doesn’t conflict at all. Abortion and capital punishment are at different level of moral concern. Abortion is intrinsically, objectively wrong and sinful whereas capital punishment is a matter of judgment, which is not in and of itself a violation of moral right. The question of whether or not you should apply capital punishment depends on circumstances and it’s an area where Catholics have a right to debate and disagree.

OBAMA: Now I agree with Mr. Keyes that the death penalty and abortion are separate cases. It’s unfortunate that with the death penalty Mr. Keyes respects that people may have a different point of view but with the issue of abortion he has labeled people everything as terrorists to slaveholders to being consistent with Nazism for holding an opposing point of view. That kind of rhetoric is not helpful in resolving a deeply emotional subject.

Pass the Stem Cell Research Bill

The Ronald Reagan Biomedical Research Act specifically permits embryonic stem cell research in Illinois. Today, more than 100 million Americans are afflicted by medical problems [which could be affected by this research]. Obama says, “This bill affects diseases that attack Americans - regardless of their gender, age, economic status, ethnicity, race or political affiliation. This is about a commitment to medical research, under strict federal guidelines. I call on leaders in Illinois and President Bush in Washington to stop playing politics on this critical issue and expand the current policy on embryonic stem cell research so that we can begin finding the cures of tomorrow today.”

Protect a woman’s right to choose

Blocked IL law: Born Alive Infant Protection Act

In the Illinois legislature, Obama blocked the proposed Born Alive Infant Protection Act, a bill to protect infants who survive abortion. He promised supporters he would sign a "Freedom of Choice Act" to repeal all legislated restrictions on abortion, state and federal. Taking office, he opened the door to federal funding of embryonic stem cell research and , by executive order, repealed the Reagan-Bush prohibition against using tax dollars to fund agencies broad that perform abortions.

Opposed born-alive treatment law because it was already law

OBAMA: If it sounds incredible that I would vote to withhold lifesaving treatment from an infant, that’s because it’s not true. There was a bill that said you have to provide lifesaving treatment. The fact is that there was already a law on the books in Illinois that required providing lifesaving treatment, which is why not only myself but pro-choice Republicans and Democrats voted against it. With respect to partial-birth abortion, I am completely supportive of a ban on late-term abortions, as long as there’s an exception for the mother’s health and life, and this bill did not contain that exception

Rated 100% by NARAL on pro-choice votes in 2005, 2006 & 2007

• 2007: 100 percent
• 2006: 100 percent
• 2005: 100 percent

Voted against banning partial birth abortion

In 1997, Obama voted against SB 230, which would have turned doctors into felons by banning so-called partial-birth abortion, & against a 2000 bill banning state funding. Although these bills included an exception to save the life of the mother, they didn’t include anything about abortions necessary to protect the health of the mother. The legislation defined a fetus as a person, & could have criminalized virtually all abortion.

Supports Roe v. Wade

Rated 0% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice stance.

OnTheIssues.org interprets the 2006 NRLC scores as follows:

• 0% - 15%: pro-choice stance (approx. 174 members)
• 16%- 84%: mixed record on abortion (approx. 101 members)
• 85%-100%: pro-life stance (approx. 190 members)

The ultimate goal of the National Right to Life Committee is to restore legal protection to innocent human life. The primary interest of the National Right to Life Committee and its members has been the abortion controversy; however, it is also concerned with related matters of medical ethics which relate to the right to life issues of euthanasia and infanticide. The Committee does not have a position on issues such as contraception, sex education, capital punishment, and national defense. The National Right to Life Committee was founded in 1973 in response to the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision, legalizing the practice of human abortion in all 50 states, throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy.

The NRLC has been instrumental in achieving a number of legislative reforms at the national level, including a ban on non-therapeutic experimentation of unborn and newborn babies, a federal conscience clause guaranteeing medical personnel the right to refuse to participate in abortion procedures, and various amendments to appropriations bills which prohibit (or limit) the use of federal funds to subsidize or promote abortions in the United States and overseas.

In addition to maintaining a lobbying presence at the federal level, NRLC serves as a clearinghouse of information for its state affiliates and local chapters, its individual members, the press, and the public.

Sponsored bill providing contraceptives for low-income women.

OFFICIAL CONGRESSIONAL SUMMARY: Amends Medicaid to:

1. prohibit a state from providing for medical coverage unless it includes certain family planning services and supplies; and
2. include women who are not pregnant but who meet income eligibility standards in a mandatory `categorically needy` group for family planning services purposes.

EXCERPTS OF BILL:

Congress makes the following findings:
1. Rates of unintended pregnancy increased by nearly 30% among low-income women between 1994 and 2002, and a low-income woman today is 4 times as likely to have an unintended pregnancy as her higher income counterpart.
2. Abortion rates decreased among higher income women but increased among low income women in that period, and a low income woman is more than 4 times as likely to have an abortion as her higher income counterpart.
3. Contraceptive use reduces a woman`s probability of having an abortion by 85%.
4. Levels of contraceptive use among low-income women at risk of unintended pregnancy declined significantly, from 92% to 86%.
5. Publicly funded contraceptive services have been shown to prevent 1,300,000 unintended pregnancies each year, and in the absence of these services the abortion rate would likely be 40% higher than it is.
6. By helping couples avoid unintended pregnancy, Medicaid-funded contraceptive services are highly cost-effective, and every public dollar spent on family planning saves $3 in the cost of pregnancy-related care alone.The Social Security Act is amended by adding [to the Medicaid section] the following: COVERAGE OF FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES AND SUPPLIES -- a State may not provide for medical coverage unless that coverage includes family planning services and supplies.

   LEGISLATIVE OUTCOME:Referred to Senate Committee on Finance; never came to a vote.

   Source: Unintended Pregnancy Reduction Act (S.2916/H.R.5795) 06-S2916 on May 19, 2006

   Ensure access to and funding for contraception.

   Obama co-sponsored ensuring access to and funding for contraception

   A bill to expand access to preventive health care services that help reduce unintended pregnancy, reduce abortions, and improve access to women`s health care. The Congress finds as follows:

   1. Healthy People 2010 sets forth a reduction of unintended pregnancies as an important health objective to achieve over the first decade of the new century.
   2. Although the CDC included family planning in its published list of the Ten Great Public Health Achievements in the 20th Century, the US still has one of the highest rates of unintended pregnancies among industrialized nations.
   3. Each year, 3,000,000 pregnancies, nearly half of all pregnancies, in the US are unintended, and nearly half of unintended pregnancies end in abortion.
   4. In 2004, 34,400,000 women, half of all women of reproductive age, were in need of contraceptive services, and nearly half of those were in need of public support for such care.
   5. The US has the highest rate of infection with sexually transmitted diseases of any industrialized country. 19 million cases impose a tremendous economic burden, as high as $14 billion per year.
   6. Increasing access to family planning services will improve women`s health and reduce the rates of unintended pregnancy, abortion, and infection with sexually transmitted diseases. Contraceptive use saves public health dollars. For every dollar spent to increase funding for family planning programs, $3.80 is saved.
   7. Contraception is basic health care that improves the health of women and children by enabling women to plan and space births.
   8. Women experiencing unintended pregnancy are at greater risk for physical abuse and women having closely spaced births are at greater risk of maternal death.
   9. A child born from an unintended pregnancy is at greater risk of low birth weight, dying in the first year of life, being abused, and not receiving sufficient resources for healthy development.
   Source: Prevention First Act (S.21/H.R.819) 2007-HR819 on Feb 5, 2007

   Click here for definitions & background information on Abortion. Click here for a Wikipedia profile of Barack Obama. Click here for a Ballotpedia profile of Barack Obama. Click here for SenateMatch quiz answers by Barack Obama. Click here for a summary of Barack Obama's positions on all issues. Click here for issue positions of other IL politicians. Click here for issue statements from IL primary archives. Click here for issue statements from IL secondary archives.
   Other candidates on Abortion:		Barack Obama on other issues:
   IL Gubernatorial: Darren Bailey J.B. Pritzker Jesse Sullivan Paul Schimpf Richard Irvin IL Senatorial: Don Tracy Juliana Stratton Kathy Salvi Peggy Hubbard Raja Krishnamoorthi Richard Durbin Robin Kelly Tammy Duckworth IL politicians IL Archives	Senate races 2026: AK: Dan Sullivan(R,incumbent) vs.Andy Barr(R) vs.Mary Peltola(D) AL: Tommy Tuberville(R,retiring) vs.Barry Moore(R) vs.Steve Marshall(R) vs.Kyle Sweetser(R) AR: Tom Cotton(R,incumbent) vs.Dan Whitfield(I,withdrew) vs.Hallie Shoffner(D) vs.Ethan Dunbar(D,lost primary) CO: John Hickenlooper(D,incumbent) vs.Janak Joshi(R) vs.Julie Gonzales(D) vs.Mark Baisley(R) DE: Chris Coons(D,incumbent) vs.Mike Katz(I) FL: Ashley Moody(R,appointee) vs.Alan Grayson(D) vs.Angie Nixon(D) vs.Alex Vindman(D) GA: Jon Ossoff(D,incumbent) vs.Buddy Carter(R) vs.Mike Collins(R) vs.John F. King(R,withdrew) IA: Joni Ernst(R,retiring) vs.Ashley Hinson(R) vs.Jim Carlin(R) vs.Bob Krause(D) vs.Josh Turek(D) vs.Zach Wahls(D) vs.J.D. Scholten(D,withdrew) ID: Jim Risch(R,incumbent) vs.David Roth(D) vs.Todd Achilles(I) IL: Richard Durbin(D,retiring) vs.Juliana Stratton(D) vs.Raja Krishnamoorthi(D) vs.Robin Kelly(D) vs.Don Tracy(R) KS: Roger Marshall(R,incumbent) vs.Patrick Schmidt(D) KY: Mitch McConnell(R,retiring) vs.Andy Barr(R) vs.Nate Morris(R) vs.Daniel Cameron(R) vs.Charles Booker(D) vs.Pamela Stevenson(D) LA: Bill Cassidy(R,incumbent) vs.John Fleming(R) vs.Julia Letlow(R) vs.Jamie Davis(D) MA: Ed Markey(D,incumbent) vs.Seth Moulton(D) vs.John Deaton(R) vs.Shiva Ayyadurai(I) ME: Susan Collins(R,incumbent) vs.Janet Mills(D) vs.Graham Platner(D) MI: Gary Peters(D,retiring) vs.Haley Stevens(D) vs.Mallory McMorrow(D) vs.Mike Rogers(R) vs.Abdul El-Sayed(D) vs.Joe Tate(R,withdrew)	MN: Tina Smith(D,retiring) vs.Angie Craig(D) vs.David Hann(R) vs.Peggy Flanagan(D) vs.Royce White(R) vs.Michele Tafoya(R) MS: Cindy Hyde-Smith(R,incumbent) vs.Scott Colom(D) vs.Ty Pinkins(D then I) MT: Steve Daines(R,retiring) vs.Kurt Alme(R) vs.Reilly Neill(D) vs.Seth Bodnar(I) NC: Thom Tillis(R,retiring) vs.Michael Whatley(R) vs.Roy Cooper(D) vs.Wiley Nickel(D,running for D.A.) NE: Peter Ricketts(R,incumbent) vs.Dan Osborn(I) NH: Jeanne Shaheen(D,retiring) vs.Chris Pappas(D) vs.John Sununu(R) vs.Scott Brown(R) NJ: Cory Booker(D,incumbent) vs.Justin Murphy(R) NM: Ben Ray Lujan(D,incumbent) vs.Matt Dodson(D) OH: Jon Husted(R,appointee) vs.Sherrod Brown(D) OK: Markwayne Mullin(R,appointed to Cabinet) vs.Kevin Hern(R) vs.Troy Green(D) vs.Ervin Yen(I) OR: Jeff Merkley(D,incumbent) vs.Jo Rae Perkins(R) vs.David Brock Smith(R) RI: Jack Reed(D,incumbent) vs.Connor Burbridge(D) SC: Lindsey Graham(R,incumbent) vs.Catherine Fleming Bruce(D) vs.Paul Dans(R) vs.Annie Andrews(D) SD: Mike Rounds(R,incumbent) vs.Julian Beaudion(D) vs.Brian Bengs(I) TN: Bill Hagerty(R,incumbent) vs.Marquita Bradshaw(D) vs.Diana Onyejiaka(D) TX: John Cornyn(R,incumbent) vs.Ken Paxton(R) vs.James Talarico(D) vs.Wesley Hunt(R,lost primary) vs.Jasmine Crockett(D,lost primary) VA: Mark Warner(D,incumbent) vs.David Williams(R) WV: Shelley Moore Capito(R,incumbent) vs.Tom Willis(R) vs.Jeff Kessler(D) vs.Zach Shrewsbury(D) WY: Cynthia Lummis(R,retiring) vs.Harriet Hageman(R) vs.Reid Rasner(R) vs.James Byrd(D)	Abortion Budget/Economy Civil Rights Corporations Crime Drugs Education Energy/Oil Environment Families Foreign Policy Free Trade Govt. Reform Gun Control Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Jobs Principles Social Security Tax Reform Technology War/Peace Welfare Other Senators Congressional Votes (analysis) Congressional Ratings Affiliations Policy Reports Page last updated: May 10, 2026; copyright 1999-2022 Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org