Dick Cheney in Higher Loyalty, by James Comey


On Government Reform: OpEd: Obstruction of justice often used for convenient

It took the prosecutor three years of litigation to get to a place where he charged, tried, and convicted Dick Cheney's chief of staff Scooter Libby of making false statements in a federal investigation, perjury, and obstruction of justice. Republican loyalists howled that he was persecuting Libby because prosecutors could never prove the underlying crime--the intentional leaking of a covert agent's name [Valerie Plame, a CIA operative] with prior knowledge of its illegality. Of course, these were the same Republicans who passionately believed that President Bill Clinton's lies under oath over an affair with an intern simply had to be pursued, because obstruction of justice and perjury strike at the core of our system. Meanwhile, Democrats who six years earlier attacked the case against Bill Clinton as a silly lie about sex, had discovered in the Libby case that they cared deeply about obstruction of justice crimes-- when the instructors were Republicans.
Source: A Higher Loyalty, p. 73, by James Comey Apr 17, 2018

On Homeland Security: OpEd: Frustrated when definitions of torture changed

I went to Attorney General Ashcroft and, in a private meeting, told him why I believed it made sense to take the dramatic step of withdrawing the Justice Department's earlier opinion on the legality of torture. He agreed. We both recognized that it would leave CIA personal exposed, in a sense, because they had done rough stuff in reliance on a legal opinion that was now withdrawn. The interrogators weren't lawyers; they had a right to rely on the advice of government counsel.

I understood why people like by Vice President Cheney were frustrated when the Department of Justice changed its legal opinions. But much of the responsibility for the original flawed legal work could be laid at the feet of policymakers like the vice president--powerful leaders who were absolutely certain what needed to be done and who demanded quick answers from a tiny group of lawyers. Their actions guaranteed the very problem we were forced to deal with down the road.

Source: A Higher Loyalty, p.106, by James Comey Apr 17, 2018

On Homeland Security: OpEd: Pressured DOJ to declare NSA domestic spying legal

Q: You mentioned [in your book "A Higher Loyalty"] that Vice President Cheney at one point said, "People are going to die because of what you're doing right now."

COMEY: I was the #2 person at the Justice Department then, the deputy attorney general. And we were in a dispute with the White House about whether there was a lawful basis for surveillance activities that the president had authorized the NSA to engage in [domestically]. We had concluded--and I agreed--that there wasn't a lawful basis for a big part of these activities. Vice President Cheney presided at a meeting to pressure me to change my view. He looked me in the eye and said, "Thousands of people are going to die because of what you're doing." What he meant was, "Because you are making us stop this surveillance program." I responded, "I have to say what we find lawful. So I can't change my view." I felt like I was going to be crushed like a grape, frankly. But in a way, there was no other way I could act. The law was clear.

Source: ABC-TV Q&A: Jim Comey on Higher Loyalty & impeaching Trump Apr 15, 2018

The above quotations are from Higher Loyalty
Truth, Lies, and Leadership

by James Comey
.
Click here for main summary page.
Click here for a profile of Dick Cheney.
Click here for Dick Cheney on all issues.
Dick Cheney on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology/Infrastructure
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)





Page last updated: Oct 10, 2018