John Linder in The FairTax Book


On Budget & Economy: Economic freedom is a component of political freedom

Soon the forward-thinking nations of the world will be getting rid of all business taxes, compliance costs, payroll and income taxes--and then stand back!

With the FairTax in place, to compete with American in the global market, other countries will have to recognize that the best way to economic prosperity is to allow people to be free in their economic endeavors--to make whatever voluntary arrangements they choose, with WHOMEVER they choose, WHENEVER they choose, without constraint from unfair tax consequences. That has huge implications for the world economy, and for the cause of freedom.

As other nations turn their constituents into "voluntary" taxpayers by copying us, they will also eliminate the coercive nature of their tax collection system and allow economic freedom to expand throughout the world. More than anything we can think of, that would spread freedom across the globe!

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p.109-110 May 31, 2006

On Budget & Economy: Our tax code has chased $10 trillion to offshore deposits

Our current code has chased roughly $10 trillion in dollar-denominated deposits into offshore financial centers. This is money that wants to be in dollars for safety, but is hiding offshore for secrecy. Without an IRS, that money would be in American deposits and investments. Bringing that money back home to work in our economy would lead to a measurable increase in the value of the American markets, make most corporate pension funds whole, and end many of the corporate bankruptcies.
Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p.196 May 31, 2006

On Corporations: Businesses don't pay taxes; they merely collect & pass on

The FairTax targets corporate taxes for elimination, and some people find this objectionable. These people might believe that corporations don't pay enough tax as it is, and they see no particular reason to lessen the burden. The economic education of Americans is so woefully inadequate that many of us actually think we pay LESS as individuals when taxes are transferred to businesses.

I'll let you in on a closely guarded secret: those corporations aren't paying taxes now. When it comes right down to it, NO business really pays taxes. The burden--all of it--falls on us.

There is only one entity in this country that actually pays taxes, and that entity is the individual. Businesses merely collect the taxes from individuals and pass them on to the government. Taxes are paid from wages, and in this country only individuals earn wages. It's even accurate to say that the assets of our government are owned by the people--though exercising any degree of control over those assets might be difficult.

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p. 31-32 May 31, 2006

On Corporations: Offshore financial centers, OFC's, avoid all US tax

    Between 1989 & 1995, more than half of all corporations doing business in the US paid no US income tax. Offshore financial centers have grown into a sophisticated draw on American capital, with many uses:
  1. A multinational corporation may set up it own OFC bank. Such a bank can be used to pay for accounting, administration, investments, currency trades, and other functions, with little tax consequences and less stringent reporting and trading restrictions.
  2. OFC's are used to set up international business corporations (IBCs), which are popular (because generally tax- & regulation-free) vehicles for managing investment funds.
  3. Insurance companies use OFCs for reinsuring catastrophic risks, which often have lower actuarial requirements and capita standards.
  4. Wealthy individuals use OFCs to protect assets and for tax planning.
  5. Foreign wealth is often kept in OFCs, to be protected from weak banking systems.
  6. Tax evasion and money laundering schemes are difficult to track down in OFCs.
Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p. 99-100 May 31, 2006

On Corporations: Most IRS actions are against small businesses for FICA

Consider this: The single largest category of IRS legal actions are brought against businesses, most of them small businesses, that collect the FICA tax from their employees but fail to remit those dollars to the Treasury. With the FairTax Plan, this is no longer a problem because there's no more withholding scheme to exploit. Now these businesses can concentrate on the job at hand, growing their business, instead of keeping payroll records for Uncle Sam.
Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p.108 May 31, 2006

On Free Trade: Punishing corporate tax structure moves HQ's abroad

Politicians and pundits create quite a bit of controversy over American corporations moving their headquarters abroad. These businesses have been called everything from "corporate Benedict Arnolds" to un-American tax cheats. These corporations aren't moving headquarters overseas because they relish the challenge of learning new languages. They're moving for one simple reason: to escape a punishing tax structure here at home.

When the corporate income tax disappears with the passage of the FairTax, this disparity will disappear, and this particular incentive to move American corporations offshore will have been eliminated.

If we were to pass the FairTax and eliminate all taxes on capital and labor, and tax personal consumption instead, we would be the only nation in the world whose companies could sell into a global economy with no tax components in the price system. Can you imagine what that would mean to corporate leaders around the world?

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p. 62-65 May 31, 2006

On Government Reform: Lobbyists manipulate and game the system

Washington is crawling with lobbyists: a virtual army of high-income attorneys & accountants who earn their living manipulating and gaming the federal tax system for the benefit of their corporate clients. One goal of the FairTax proposal is to eliminate all business taxes. As the FairTax movement gains more and more public support, the screams of alarm from this army of lawyers and accountants will be something to behold. After all, our plan will place their million-dollar incomes in dire jeopardy. They will fight back, hard and dirty. These lobbyists and lawyers aren't concentrated with economic growth or the creation of jobs. Their one goal is to preserve our horribly convoluted tax code--the code that sets the stage for the Beltway heroics and huge paychecks.

The money paid to the Washington lobbyists for tax code manipulation is just a small part of the total cost of complying with our tax laws. Money spent complying with the tax code is money that is not spent growing our economy.

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p. 36-37 May 31, 2006

On Social Security: Social Security is on the verge of financial collapse

President Bush put a great deal of his political capital behind a push to reform Social Security in 2005. As of this writing, the politicians are still arguing. There's no shortage of evidence that Social Security is on the verge of financial collapse, and Medicare is pretty close to being on life support itself.

America has always been a generous nation; we have always concerned ourselves with the problems of others as much as we have our own. That generous spirit, as it relates to Social Security and Medicare, is quickly driving both of these programs toward bankruptcy. We are facing a grave risk to the economic security of both the next generation of workers and the next generation of retirees.

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p.123-124 May 31, 2006

On Social Security: Payroll tax increase is a lousy way to reform the system

The proposals for saving the retirement programs are many. Some politicians want to life the earnings limit and levy the Social Security tax on 100% of our earnings. This, they believe, will "make the rich pay for their fair share." Curiously, they also recommend lowering the levy on lower income earners. Having already essentially relieved the bottom 50% of income earners from any income tax liability at all, these politicians now want to work on payroll taxes. It's a sure way to earn voter loyalty, bu a lousy way to reform the system.

Pres. Bush has proposed allowing workers to take a portion of their Social Security contribution and invest the money in one of a series of privately held packages of stocks and/or bonds. These packages would require some certification to prevent investors from being entirely speculative.

Over the long haul, it's clear that investments in the financial markets would produce far better retirement incomes than the current system. But that's over the long haul.

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p.132-133 May 31, 2006

On Tax Reform: Tax withholding camouflages the actual tax burden

The popular story is that withholding was born of necessity during WWII because a reliable cash flow was needed to fund the war effort. Not so. The 1913 law establishing the income tax allowed the federal government to withhold taxes just as it is done today. Then something happened that stopped the withholding juggernaut: The citizens of 1913 said, "Noting doing." They complained to their representatives, and in 1917 a law was passed barring withholding. Taxpayers went back to paying their taxes in on lump sum, and politicians went back to their drawing boards.

But the politicians weren't ready to throw in the towel. They saw that withholding was the one way they could camouflage the actual tax burden pressed on the American people and further their political dream of spreading the scope and power of the federal government.

So when WWII came along, it provided the political class with the handy excuse they're been seeking to put income tax withholding back on the table.

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p. 23 May 31, 2006

On Tax Reform: More complicated tax code means higher compliance costs

The cost for our current tax system isn't just reflected in the amount withheld from your paycheck. It goes much further than that. Starting in 1954, the income tax was placed at the center of our tax system. Since 1954, the number of words in our tax code has increased by nearly 500%. And that's just the increase in the CODE. It's the actual IRS regulations that tell you how to calculate, report, and pay your taxes. The number of words in the IRS REGULATIONS has increased by 939%.
Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p. 46-47 May 31, 2006

On Tax Reform: FairTax repeals AMT; estate tax; gift tax; & capital gains

All of those lovely taxes will be replaced with a single-rate personal consumption tax--a simple sales tax--on new goods and services. In place of the many taxes we pay today, consumers will pay an embedded personal consumption tax in the amount of 23% on all goods and services sold at the retail level.
Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p. 73-76 May 31, 2006

On Tax Reform: Politicians should not decide who "needs" tax cuts

It is widely agreed that the underground economy is huge, and that most of the growth has occurred in the past thirty years. This growth stems largely from a growing sense of anger and alienation over a government that seems to insist that what we produce is theirs, and that we should be allowed to keep no more than our politicians decide we deserve. Perhaps you remember some elected officials who were opposed to President Bush's tax cuts--politicians who were upset because, they claimed, the people who were going to benefit the most from the cuts didn't actually "nee" the money. We don't know about you, but many Americans are a bit troubled by the prospect of politicians determining just how much of our hard-earned money we actually "need." Isn't that for us to decide?
Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p. 95-96 May 31, 2006

On Tax Reform: FairTax is absolutely not a VAT

Isn't the FairTax really just a VAT tax like they have in Europe?

No! Absolutely not!

"VAT" stands for value-added tax. The VAT is essentially a sales tax that is added at every step in the production of retail goods. The VAT is popular with politicians, for the very reason that the people should shun it: It's capable of producing huge amounts of revenue while remaining virtually hidden from consumers.

When VAT rates are increased, it looks like another increment of inflation to the unawar consumer. It's central to the design of the FairTax that it is added only once: at the point of sale to the retail purchaser. It's an upfront charge, not a series of hidden costs. If you hear someone refer to the FairTax as a VAT, you can be sure you're listening to someone who hasn't done his homework. Or who, for whatever reason, it trying to torpedo the FairTax.

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p.153-154 May 31, 2006

On Tax Reform: AMT was introduced as a "spite" tax in 1969

The alternative minimum tax (AMT) was introduced in 1969 as a "spite" tax. It seems that some politicians didn't like that fact that just a few years earlier 150,000 high-achieving individuals rudely took advantage of the perfectly legal deductions and credits available to them--and paid no federal income tax. So the AMT was passed to force a second calculation of your earnings and deductions. How does it work? If a taxpayer's deductions exceed a certain percentage of their gross income, they lose deductions. That'll teach 'em!

The bad news? The AMT was never indexed to inflation--a little fact that eluded the average American during the debate in the AMT legislation, since most American taxpayers were completely uninterested in the proceedings.

Today, however, thanks to the failure to index the AMT, disaster is waiting around the corner. By 2010, about 35 million Americans will be forced to pay the AMT. The victims will no longer be just "high-earning individuals," but middle Americans.

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p.155-156 May 31, 2006

On Tax Reform: Income taxes are seized; consumption taxes are voluntary

The FairTax was designed be economists and researchers at the best American universities, with help from some of America's most accomplished businesspeople. As such, it was designed to benefit the American free enterprise system and to promote economic liberty. There is nothing coercive about the FairTax. Under its provisions, each and every family in America can meet its basic needs with no federal tax consequences at all. It is only when you choose to spend above the level of basic necessity that you begin to pay any taxes to support the operation of the federal government.

In short... income taxes are seized. Consumption taxes are paid. Which way do you want it?

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p.176 May 31, 2006

On Technology: FairTax Card: register with feds for monthly prebate

The folks who wrote the FairTax Plan knew that burdening the poor with a 23% retail sales tax would doom the plan from the outset. That's why the prebate--the monthly check covering taxes on all basic household necessities--was invented.

The size of th monthly prebate payment will be based on the government's published poverty levels--in 2006, an annual consumption allowance of $26,400. This is the amount the government estimates you would spend during that one year to buy the basic necessities of life The sales tax on this amount would equal $6,072. The government would rebate this amount to you in 12 monthly installments of just under $506.

And consider this possibility: a FairTax Card! The government could issue such a card to every head of household. This FairTax Card would be much like your bank debit card, with a magnetic stripe identifying you and coded with your PIN. It would take a simple mouse click in Washington for your FairTax Card to be credited with your monthly rebate payment.

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p. 85-90 May 31, 2006

On Technology: Tax Internet sales the same as store sales

Under the FairTax, will the Internet be taxed? The same principle that determines the collection of taxes on services applies to Internet sales. While we agree with Congress's law forbidding government from taxing access to the Internet, we believe that the only fair way to handle sales conducted over the Internet is to tax them in just the same way as any other sale of goods or services. As we've stated over and over, government ought to be neutral--period. No retailer who pays taxes in our community ought to be put at a 7 percent disadvantage to some Internet retailer, large or small.

We envision a department of the Treasury to deal with Internet and catalog sales, with stiff penalties for those selling into our communities who do not abide by the law.

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p.170 May 31, 2006

On Welfare & Poverty: Over 25% of cost of EITC is fraud

The absurdly named Earned Income Tax Credit is a prime conduit for income redistribution from high-income earners to the poor and middle class.

The EITC was passed to relieve lower-income Americans of the tax they pay for Social Security and Medicare. They are already relieved of paying income taxes to pay for--well, everything. So why should they be expected to pay for their retirement programs? This little piece of our budget has grown to $38 billion & it is estimated that over 25% of that is fraud.

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p. 83 May 31, 2006

On Welfare & Poverty: Americans don't give to charity for tax deductions

Won't churches and charities suffer if charitable giving is not deductible? In a word: No! Americans don't give to charities for tax deductions. They give to charities because they want to be helpful.

In 1980, the top marginal tax rate was 70%. That means that every dollar at the margin that was contributed to charity reduced the donor's taxes by 70 cents. Just 30 cents came out of his pocket. We gave $40 billion to charities that year. By 1988, we had dramatically reduced the top marginal tax to 28%, thus reducing the value of charitable contributions. We gave nearly $200 billion to charities that year. "Money" Magazine reports that the average American donates $1,600 annually, even though 2/3 of all Americans receive no tax deduction because they don't itemize those contributions on their tax returns.

Let's make it just this simple: How many people do you know who give money simply to get a tax deduction? With taxes at the 35% level, who would spend $1,000 to save $350?

Source: The FairTax Book, by N.Boortz & Rep.J.Linder, p.164-165 May 31, 2006

The above quotations are from The FairTax Book:
Saying Goodbye to the Income Tax and the IRS
, by Neal Boortz and Rep. John Linder.
Click here for other excerpts from The FairTax Book:
Saying Goodbye to the Income Tax and the IRS
, by Neal Boortz and Rep. John Linder
.
Click here for other excerpts by John Linder.
Click here for a profile of John Linder.
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Feb 06, 2014