|
John Roberts on Gun Control
Supreme Court Justice (nominated by Pres. George W. Bush 2005)
|
|
|
Unions have right to negotiate where firearms are stored
Roberts concurred in the court’s ruling in NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY The Union petitions for review of a decision by the Authority wherein the Authority held that the Customs Service is not required
to negotiate over a Union proposal concerning the storage of handguns.
Although the Authority correctly ruled that the proposal came within the exemption of negotiability for internal security practices, the Authority erred in failing to follow its
own precedent in determining whether the bargaining proposal constituted an appropriate arrangement subjecting it to bargainability. Therefore we [find in favor of the Union and] grant the petition for review.
Roberts concurred: “I join the court’s opinion on the understanding that the Authority [can determine unilaterally if] security at a particular location is adequate.
Source: FindLaw case 04-1157, US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit
, Apr 15, 2005
Right to gun ownership is individual, not collective.
Justice Roberts joined the Court's decision on District of Columbia v. Heller on Jun 26, 2008:
Overturning DC's handgun ban, the court ruled that the Second Amendment protects the individual right to own a gun for private use--not only in connection with service in a militia. The 5-to-4 decision, District of Columbia v. Heller, left unanswered questions, but also much room for continued gun regulation, short of an absolute ban.
HELD: Delivered by Scalia; joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito
The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable the citizens' militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms.DISSENT #1: Stevens, joined by Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
The Stevens dissent rests on four main points of disagreement:- that the Founders would have made the individual right aspect of the Second Amendment express if that was what was intended
- that the "militia" preamble demands the conclusion that the Second Amendment touches on state militia service only
- that many lower courts' later "collective-right" reading of the Miller decision constitutes stare decisis
- and that the Court has not considered gun-control laws (e.g., the National Firearms Act) unconstitutional.
DISSENT #2: Breyer, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg
Justice Breyer filed a separate dissenting opinion that, even with an individual-rights view, the DC handgun ban and trigger lock requirement would nevertheless be permissible limitations on the right. The Breyer dissent concludes, "there simply is no untouchable constitutional right to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas."
Source: Supreme Court case 08-HELLER argued on Mar 18, 2008
Page last updated: Mar 21, 2022