• Strongly Support means you believe: Buy American and impose import tariffs against China. Take a hard-line on the immorality of the Chinese government: No WTO, no MFN, no PNTR.
• Support means you believe: Pressure for human rights improvements, and strict sanctions against future human rights violations, should be tied inherently to all trade negotiations with China. An annual review of Chinese improvement is a good idea.
• Oppose means you believe: Maintain open trade with China as a tool to move China towards democracy. We should conduct open trade with China because it's good for the US economy - we will end up with cheaper prices and more export-related jobs. We can pressure China better if they rely on us as trade partners.
• Strongly Oppose means you believe: We should conduct open trade with China because the US government should not be involved with foreign government's affairs. If we want to sanction China for human rights violations, we should do so by private-based boycotts.

This question is looking for your views on dealing with the world's largest remaining Communist power. However you answer the above question would be similar to your response to these statements:

• Block China's entry into the WTO.
• Do not grant China MFN.
• The Cox Report indicates that China is our real enemy.
• Formally recognize Taiwan.
• Human rights rules should apply to Cuba, Vietnam, and other potential human rights violators.

• Strongly Support means you believe in the principle that the Beijing government is evil -- the Evil Empire in Russia has been replaced by the ChiComms.
• Support means you believe that for practical reasons, pressure via tade restrictions will improve human rights in China.
• Oppose means you believe that for practical reasons, influence within the WTO will better improve human rights in China.
• Strongly Oppose means you believe in the principle of free trade supercedes huma rights improvements.

China is formally known as ‘The People’s Republic of China’, or ‘PRC.’ The PRC is home to nearly a billion and a half people, over 20% of the world’s population. The PRC has been ruled by the Chinese Communist Party since 1949.

Taiwan is known as ‘The Republic of China’ or ‘ROC.’ Taiwan is an island off the coast of the PRC, and has a democratically elected government. Taiwan is home to 21 million people, but its economy is comparable in size to the PRC. Taiwan split from the PRC during the Communist Revolution, when the former government was driven off the mainland by the Communists.

The US has promised to defend Taiwan against an invasion from China. China has promised to invade if Taiwan declares independence, most recently in July 1999 when Taiwan's President declared the ‘One China’ policy a fiction.

The current US policy is called ‘strategic ambiguity’: we are intentionally unclear on what would provoke US intervention, so that neither China nor Taiwan will act rashly. President Bush removed some of the ambiguity in April 2001, by declarnig that the US would unambiguously defend Taiwan with military force in the case of a Chinese invasion.

The candidates’ views on the Cox Report focus on what should be done to prevent further Chinese spying, and on what the government should do about past Chinese spying.

Congress reviews MFN status annually to decide if China should be granted MFN status for the next year. Granting MFN status in recent years has been tied to the improvement of China’s human rights record. Talks are held between the US and the PRC to decide which human rights violations will be addressed, and then MFN status is granted.

The term ‘MFN’ has been replaced this year by ‘Normal Trading Relations’, abbreviated ‘NTR’, which means the same thing.

The US House of Representatives voted in May 2000 to grant China ‘Permanent NTR’ status, ending the annual debate.

China is seeking membership in the WTO because that would ensure China of free trade with other WTO members. If granted WTO membership, China would no longer be subject to its annual MFN review. But China would also have to abide by the WTO trade rules themselves, which would mean lowering their import tariffs against US goods.

The Senate overwhelmingly (83-15) voted for PNTR for China in September 2000 and President Clinton signed it into law. This law included the US's agreement for China's entry into the WTO.

• ‘Defend Taiwan’ by increasing military aid, or by reducing US strategic ambiguity, or by disavowing the ‘One China’ policy, is a buzzword that implies an anti-China stance.
• Mentioning ‘Tibet’, ‘Xinjiang’, ‘Tiananmen’, when discussing China implies that one would restrict trade with China on human rights grounds.
  • ‘Tibet’ is the Buddhist province (bordering Nepal and India), home of the exiled Dalai Lama, where the Chinese invaded in 1959, and have been putting down Buddhist uprisings since.
  • ‘Xinjiang’ is the Islamic province in the west of China (bordering Pakistan, Afghanistan, and the Islamic former Soviet republics), known to Muslims as Uighurstan or East Turkestan, where the Chinese have been putting down uprisings even more severley and secretively than in Tibet.
  • ‘Tiananmen’ refers to the massacre in Tiananmen Square (central Beijing) on June 4, 1989, where thousands of protestors demanding democracy and an open society were killed by the Chinese army.
• ‘Being tough’ on China implies a desire to limit trade with China. ‘Being tough’ on China takes different forms each year: in 1999, one would say ‘Heed the Cox Report’; in 2000, ‘Crack down on Chinese spies’; in 2001, ‘Demand our spy plane back.’
• Often, trade with Vietnam is a proxy for one's views on trade with China. One usually supports or opposes open trade with Vietnam on the same grounds that one does so with China, except without the geopolitical underpinning.