Search for...
OnTheIssuesLogo

John Ashcroft on Principles & Values


Ashcroft: Songwriter & member of The Singing Senators

Although he doesn't dance, Ashcroft, as many fans of latenight television know, does sing. As a senator, he held down the baritone section of the Singing Senators, a foursome that broke up, like the Beatles, when Ashcroft went off to do a solo project and member Jim Jeffords decided he liked a different sort of music. Ashcroft's cornball patriotic tune "Let the Eagle Soar" became an internet hit and then aired repeatedly on the The Late Show with David Letterman, until finally the AG himself turned up to sing it:
Let the mighty eagle soar
Soar with healing in her wings,
As the land beneath her sings:
Only God, no other kings.
John Ashcroft has a very pleasant singing voice.
Source: Fanatics and Fools, by Arianna Huffington, p. 61 Apr 14, 2004

Clarke: illusion of security over civil liberties

What Ashcroft and others did in the case of Jose Padilla, and in proposing to amend the Patriot Act to allow for actions without judicial review, was to fundamentally shake the confidence of many Americans in the government's ability to safeguard our rights. Despite the 'Global War on Terrorism' and despite (or because of) the 'War on Iraq' we are also still highly vulnerable to terrorism.
Source: Against All Enemies, by Richard Clarke, p.257 & 262 Mar 23, 2004

Common-sense conservative

John Ashcroft characterized himself [at his confirmation hearing] as a “common sense conservative” willing to compromise with political foes. Ashcroft recalled that when he led the National Association of State Attorneys General, “I understood I had to sacrifice some of my advocacy roles.” Ashcroft said he would follow that practice as attorney general.

Ashcroft assured his former colleagues on Tuesday that he could push his personal beliefs aside and enforce laws as they are written by Congress and interpreted by the Supreme Court even though he may disagree with them. “My primary personal belief is that the law is supreme, that I don’t place myself above the law, that I shouldn’t place myself above the law,” he said. “So it would violate my beliefs to do it.” If his religious faith ever were to come in conflict with his enforcement of the law, “then I would have to resign,” he said.

Source: By Libby Quaid, Associated Press in Washington Post Jan 17, 2001

Law is supreme, above his personal beliefs

Sen. Leahy questioned Ashcroft’s opposition to Bill Lann Lee as head of the Justice Department’s civil rights division and Clinton’s nomination of Surgeon General David Satcher. While Ashcroft gave Lee high marks professionally, he said at the time that Lee’s beliefs “limit his capacity to have the balanced view of making judgments that will be necessary for the person who runs the division.” In other words, Leahy said, Ashcroft had the same questions for Lee and Satcher that Democrats now have for Ashcroft: Will he be able to enforce laws with which he disagrees?

Ashcroft characterized his differences with Lee and Satcher as policy issues. He said he voted against Lee because of “serious concerns about his willingness to enforce” the Supreme Court’s decision limiting preferences for minority companies in awarding government contracts. Satcher, Ashcroft said, had backed AIDS studies in Africa that withheld treatment from some pregnant women with HIV to test the effect of a new approach.

Source: By Libby Quaid, Associated Press in Washington Post Jan 17, 2001

Clinton should fully disclose about Monica & resign if true

Although at this point the allegations involving President Clinton [in the Lewinsky affair] remain to be substantiated, due to their seriousness and the central role of the Presidency in this country, the President should deal with these charges fully, honestly, and immediately. This President is skilled at telling us what did not happen and what is not true. The American people, however, deserve a full and immediate accounting of what did happen. The President must tell us the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

If the allegations are true, then the President has disgraced himself and his office, and should resign. The President must enjoy the presumption of innocence. Americans are skeptical, however, because of the poor track record of President Clinton and the low ethical standards of his Administration. The instant credibility accorded the Clinton allegations is a measure of how deeply compromised this President is in his ability to command the trust of the nation.

Source: Constituent E-mail Mar 23, 1998

Religious affiliation: Assembly of God.

Ashcroft : religious affiliation:

The Adherents.com website is an independent project and is not supported by or affiliated with any organization (academic, religious, or otherwise).

What’s an adherent?

The most common definition used in broad compilations of statistical data is somebody who claims to belong to or worship in a religion. This is the self-identification method of determining who is an adherent of what religion, and it is the method used in most national surveys and polls.

Such factors as religious service attendance, belief, practice, familiarity with doctrine, belief in certain creeds, etc., may be important to sociologists, religious leaders, and others. But these are measures of religiosity and are usually not used academically to define a person’s membership in a particular religion. It is important to recognize there are various levels of adherence, or membership within religious traditions or religious bodies. There’s no single definition, and sources of adherent statistics do not always make it clear what definition they are using.

Source: Adherents.com web site 00-ADH9 on Nov 7, 2000

  • Click here for definitions & background information on Principles & Values.
  • Click here for policy papers on Principles & Values.
  • Click here for SenateMatch answers by John Ashcroft.
  • Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Principles & Values in The Forum.
Other candidates on Principles & Values: John Ashcroft on other issues:
MO Gubernatorial:
Bob Holden
MO Senatorial:
Jean Carnahan
Jim Talent
Kit Bond
Mel Carnahan
Nancy Farmer

Presidential:
George W. Bush
(Republican for President)
V.P.Dick Cheney
(Republican for V.P.)
Sen.John Kerry
(Democratic nominee for Pres.)
Sen.John Edwards
(Democratic nominee for V.P.)
Ralph Nader
(Reform nominee for Pres.)
Peter Camejo
(Reform nominee for V.P.)
David Cobb
(Green nominee for Pres.)
Michael Badnarik
(Libertarian nominee for Pres.)
Michael Peroutka
(Constitution nominee for Pres.)
2004 Senate Races:
(AK)Knowles v.Murkowski v.Sykes
(AR)Holt v.Lincoln
(AZ)McCain v.Starky
(CA)Boxer v.Jones v.Gray
(CO)Coors v.Salazar v.Randall v.Acosta
(CT)Dodd v.Orchulli
(FL)Castor v.Martinez
(GA)Isakson v.Majette v.Buckley
(IA)Grassley v.Small v.Northrop
(IL)Obama v.Keyes
(IN)Bayh v.Scott
(KY)Bunning v.Mongiardo
(LA)John v.Vitter v.Kennedy
(MD)Mikulski v.Pipkin
(MO)Bond v.Farmer
(NC)Bowles v.Burr
(ND)Dorgan v.Liffrig
(NH)Granny D v.Gregg
(NV)Reid v.Ziser
(NY)Schumer v.Mills v.McReynolds
(OH)Fingerhut v.Voinovich
(OK)Carson v.Coburn
(OR)Wyden v.King
(PA)Hoeffel v.Specter v.Summers
(SC)DeMint v.Tenenbaum
(SD)Daschle v.Thune
(UT)Bennett v.Van Dam
(VT)Leahy v.McMullen
(WA)Murray v.Nethercutt
(WI)Feingold v.Michels
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
HouseMatch
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes