OnTheIssuesLogo

Candidate Notes on 99-5

 


99-5 on Jan 11, 2000

The petitioner alleged that she was raped while a student at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute, and that this attack violated [part of the Violence Against Women Act], which provides a federal civil remedy for the victims of gender-motivated violence.

Held:

(Rehnquist, joined by O’Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas)
The Commerce Clause does not provide Congress with authority to enact a federal civil remedy [a lawsuit]. Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which permits Congress to enforce equal protection of the laws, also does not give Congress the authority to enact [such a law. Despite] pervasive bias in various state justice systems against victims of gender-motivated violence, the 14th Amendment prohibits only state action, not private conduct.

Concurrence:

(Thomas)
The Federal Government persists in its view that the Commerce Clause has virtually no limits. Until this Court replaces its existing Commerce Clause jurisprudence,

we will continue to see Congress appropriating state police powers under the guise of regulating commerce.

Dissent:

(Souter, joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer)
The Court says both that it leaves Commerce Clause precedent undisturbed and that the Civil Rights Remedy of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 exceeds Congress’s power under that Clause. I find the claims irreconcilable and respectfully dissent. Congress has the power to legislate with regard to activity that, in the aggregate, has a substantial effect on interstate commerce. A mountain of data assembled by Congress shows the effects of violence against women on interstate commerce. Today’s majority, however, finds no significance whatever in the state support for the Act based upon the States’ acknowledged failure to deal adequately with gender-based violence in state courts, and the belief of their own law enforcement agencies that national action is essential.

Participating counts on VoteMatch question 2.



Democrats participating in 99-5



Republicans participating in 99-5



Independents participating in 99-5

Stephen Breyer j2dUS Supreme Court
Ruth Bader Ginsburg j2dUS Supreme Court
Anthony Kennedy j1US Supreme Court
Sandra Day O'Connor j1US Supreme Court
William Rehnquist w1US Supreme Court
Antonin Scalia j1US Supreme Court
David Souter w2dUS Supreme Court
John Paul Stevens j2dUS Supreme Court
Clarence Thomas w3cUS Supreme Court



Total recorded by OnTheIssues:

Democrats: 0
Republicans: 0
Independents: 9