OnTheIssuesLogo

Russ Carnahan on Families & Children

Democratic Representative (MO-3)


Voted YES on four weeks of paid parental leave for federal employees.

Congressional Summary:Allows federal employees to substitute any available paid leave for any leave without pay available for either the: (1) birth of a child; or (2) placement of a child with the employee for either adoption or foster care. Makes available for any of the 12 weeks of leave an employee is entitled to for such purposes: (1) four administrative weeks of paid parental leave in connection with the birth or placement involved; and (2) any accumulated annual or sick leave.

Proponent's argument to vote Yes:

Rep. STEVE LYNCH (D, MA-9): This bill takes an important step toward improving the Federal Government's ability to recruit and retain a highly qualified workforce by providing paid parental leave to Federal and Congressional employees for the birth, adoption or placement of a child for foster care, which is a benefit that is extended to many in the private sector in other industrialized countries.

Opponent's argument to vote No:Rep. DARRELL ISSA (R, CA-49): This bill sends the wrong message at the wrong time to working American taxpayers and families that are struggling in difficult times. Our economy is in crisis, and deficits are already soaring. This bill does not have one provision to say if you make $170,000 a year, why do we have to give you this benefit, because you have to choose between feeding your children and being with your children? Certainly not. There are no protections against, in fact, those who do not need this special benefit getting it. There are no safeguards at all. As a matter of fact, this bill envisions the $1 billion over 5 years, swelling to $4 billion over 10 years or more because, in fact, they believe it should be 8 weeks of special leave. Federal employees enjoy one of the highest levels of job security, without a doubt, anywhere in the United States. I would venture to say many of them the highest. More importantly, in good times and bad, they keep their jobs.

Reference: Federal Employees Paid Parental Leave Act; Bill H.R.626 ; vote number 2009-H310 on Jun 4, 2009

Give parents tools to balance work and family.

Carnahan adopted the manifesto, "A New Agenda for the New Decade":

Strengthen America’s Families
While the steady reduction in the number of two-parent families of the last 40 years has slowed, more than one-third of our children still live in one- or no-parent families. There is a high correlation between a childhood spent with inadequate parental support and an adulthood spent in poverty or in prison.

To strengthen families, we must redouble efforts to reduce out-of-wedlock pregnancies, make work pay, eliminate tax policies that inadvertently penalize marriage, and require absent fathers to pay child support while offering them new opportunities to find work. Because every child needs the attention of at least one caring and competent adult, we should create an “extended family” of adult volunteer mentors.

Family breakdown is not the only challenge we face. As two-worker families have become the norm, harried parents have less time to spend on their most important job: raising their children. Moreover, parents and schools often find themselves contending with sex- and violence-saturated messages coming from an all-pervasive mass entertainment media.

We should continue public efforts to give parents tools to balance work and family and shield their children from harmful outside influences. For example, we should encourage employers to adopt family-friendly policies and practices such as parental leave, flex-time, and telecommuting. Public officials should speak out about violence in our culture and should press the entertainment media to adopt self-policing codes aimed at protecting children.

Source: The Hyde Park Declaration 00-DLC4 on Aug 1, 2000

Permanent crime database for volunteers with kids.

Carnahan co-sponsored creating permanent crime database for volunteers with kids

A bill to amend the National Child Protection Act of 1993 to establish a permanent background check system. Congress finds the following:

  1. In 2006, a total of 16,500,000 adults volunteered their service to education or youth programs.
  2. An estimated 6.6% of individuals in the United States will serve time in prison for a crime during their lifetime. The Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System of the FBI maintains fingerprints and criminal histories on more than 47,000,000 individuals, many of whom have been arrested or convicted multiple times.
  3. Of individuals released from prison, an estimated 67.5% were rearrested for a felony or serious misdemeanor within 3 years.
  4. Given the large number of individuals with criminal records and the vulnerability of the population they work with, human service organizations that work with children need an effective and reliable means of obtaining a complete criminal history in order to determine the suitability of a potential volunteer or employee.
  5. The large majority of Americans (88%) favor granting youth-serving organizations access to conviction records for screening volunteers and 59% favored allowing youth-serving organizations to consider arrest records when screening volunteers.
  6. Even when accessible, the cost of a criminal background check can be prohibitively expensive, between $21 and $99 for each volunteer or employee.
  7. The Child Safety Pilot Program demonstrates that timely and affordable background checks are possible, as background checks under that program are completed within 3 to 5 business days at a cost of $18.
    Source: Child Protection Improvements Act (S.2756/H.R.5606) 08-S2756 on Jul 28, 2008

    Teach teens about both abstinence & contraception.

    Carnahan signed Responsible Education About Life Act

      To provide for the reduction of adolescent pregnancy, HIV rates, and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), Congress finds as follows:
    1. Leading public health organizations stress the need for sexuality education that includes messages about abstinence and contraception.
    2. A 2005 statement [to Congress] urged that 'Sexuality education should be non-judgmental & support parent-child communication & should not impose religious or ideological viewpoints upon students.'
    3. [A Congressionally-sponsored] 2006 position paper that 'Efforts to promote abstinence should include information about concepts of healthy sexuality, sexual orientation & tolerance, personal responsibility, risks of HIV, access to reproductive health care, and benefits & risks of condoms & other contraceptive methods.'
    4. 8 in 10 Americans believe that sex education should promote abstinence and provide information about the effectiveness & benefits of contraception.
    5. There is strong evidence that more comprehensive sex education can effectively help young people delay sexual initiation, even as it increases contraceptive use among sexually active youth.
    6. There is no evidence that federally funded abstinence-only-until-marriage programs are effective in stopping or delaying teen sex.
    7. Most young people have sex for the first time at about age 17, but do not marry until their late 20s. Hence young adults are at risk of unwanted pregnancy & STDs for nearly a decade.

    Source: S.611&HR1551 2009-S611 on Mar 17, 2009

    Other candidates on Families & Children: Russ Carnahan on other issues:
    MO Gubernatorial:
    Jay Nixon
    MO Senatorial:
    Claire McCaskill
    Kit Bond

    Pending elections:
    D,IL-5:Emanuel
    D,CA-31:Solis
    D,NY-20:Gillibrand

    Special elections
    in 110th Congress:

    R,GA-10:Broun
    D,IN-7:Carson
    D,LA-6:Cazayoux
    D,MD-4:Edwards
    D,IL-14:Foster
    D,CA-37:Richardson
    R,LA-1:Scalise
    D,CA-12:Speier
    D,MA-5:Tsongas
    R,VA-1:Wittman
    GOP Freshmen
    in 111th Congress:

    R,OH-7:Austria
    R,OH-16:Boccieri
    R,LA-2:Cao
    R,LA-6:Cassidy
    R,UT-3:Chaffetz
    R,CA-6:Coffman
    R,LA-4:Fleming
    R,KY-2:Guthrie
    R,MS-3:Harper
    R,CA-52:Hunter
    R,KS-2:Jenkins
    R,NJ-7:Lance
    R,NY-26:Lee
    R,MO-9:Luetkemeyer
    R,WY-AL:Lummis
    R,CA-4:McClintock
    R,TX-22:Olson
    R,MN-3:Paulsen
    R,FL-15:Posey
    R,TN-1:Roe
    R,FL-16:Rooney
    R,IL-18:Schock
    R,PA-5:Thompson
    Dem. Freshmen
    in 111th Congress:

    D,NJ-3:Adler
    D,AL-2:Bright
    D,VA-11:Connolly
    D,PA-3:Dahlkemper
    D,OH-1:Driehaus
    D,OH-11:Fudge
    D,FL-8:Grayson
    D,AL-5:Griffith
    D,IL-11:Halvorson
    D,NM-1:Heinrich
    D,CT-4:Himes
    D,OH-15:Kilroy
    D,AZ-1:Kirkpatrick
    D,NC-8:Kissell
    D,FL-24:Kosmas
    D,MD-1:Kratovil
    D,NM-3:Lujan
    D,NY-25:Maffei
    D,CO-4:Markey
    D,NY-29:Massa
    D,NY-13:McMahon
    D,ID-1:Minnick
    D,VA-5:Perriello
    D,MI-9:Peters
    D,ME-1:Pingree
    D,CO-2:Polis
    D,MI-7:Schauer
    D,OR-5:Schrader
    D,NM-2:Teague
    D,NV-3:Titus
    D,NY-21:Tonko
    Abortion
    Budget/Economy
    Civil Rights
    Corporations
    Crime
    Drugs
    Education
    Energy/Oil
    Environment
    Families/Children
    Foreign Policy
    Free Trade
    Govt. Reform
    Gun Control
    Health Care
    Homeland Security
    Immigration
    Infrastructure/Technology
    Jobs
    Principles/Values
    Social Security
    Tax Reform
    War/Iraq/Mideast
    Welfare/Poverty

    Main Page
    Profile
    MO politicians

    Page last updated: Oct 03, 2009