|
Tom Davis on Crime
Republican Representative (VA-11)
|
Opposes the death penalty
Q: Do you support the statement, "The death penalty"?A: No.
Source: Email interview on 2008 Senate race with OnTheIssues.org
Aug 10, 2008
Opposes mandatory Three Strikes sentencing laws.
Q: Do you support the statement, "Mandatory Three Strikes sentencing laws"?A: No--removing authority from the judge in the case is a blankcheck for injustice.
Source: Email interview on 2008 Senate race with OnTheIssues.org
Aug 10, 2008
Voted NO on funding for alternative sentencing instead of more prisons.
Vote on an amendment that would reduce the funding for violent offender imprisonment by and truth-in-sentencing programs by $61 million. The measure would increase funding for Boys and Girls Clubs and drug courts by the same amount.
Reference: Amendment sponsored by Scott, D-VA;
Bill HR 4690
; vote number 2000-317
on Jun 22, 2000
Voted YES on more prosecution and sentencing for juvenile crime.
Vote to pass a bill to appropriate $1.5 billion to all of the states that want to improve their juvenile justice operations. Among other provisions this bill includes funding for development, implementation, and administration of graduated sanctions for juvenile offenders, funds for building, expanding, or renovating juvenile corrections facilities, hiring juvenile judges, probation officers, and additional prosecutors for juvenile cases.
Reference: Bill introduced by McCollum, R-FL;
Bill HR 1501
; vote number 1999-233
on Jun 17, 1999
Voted NO on maintaining right of habeas corpus in Death Penalty Appeals.
Vote on an amendment to delete provisions in the bill that would make it harder for prisoners who have been given the death penalty in state courts to appeal the decision on constitutional grounds in the federal courts ['Habeas Corpus'].
Bill HR 2703
; vote number 1996-64
on Mar 14, 1996
Voted YES on making federal death penalty appeals harder.
Vote on a bill to make it harder for prisoners who have been given the death penalty in state courts to appeal the decision on constitutional grounds in the federal courts.
Bill HR 729
; vote number 1995-109
on Feb 8, 1995
Rated 40% by CURE, indicating mixed votes on rehabilitation.
Davis scores 40% by CURE on rehabilitation issues
CURE (Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants) is a membership organization of families of prisoners, prisoners, former prisoners and other concerned citizens. CURE's two goals are
- to use prisons only for those who have to be in them; and
- for those who have to be in them, to provide them all the rehabilitative opportunities they need to turn their lives around.
The ratings indicate the legislator’s percentage score on CURE’s preferred votes.
Source: CURE website 00n-CURE on Dec 31, 2000
Require DNA testing for all federal executions.
Davis co-sponsored the Innocence Protection Act:
Title: To reduce the risk that innocent persons may be executed.
Summary: Authorizes a person convicted of a Federal crime to apply for DNA testing to support a claim that the person did not commit: - the Federal crime of which the person was convicted; or
- any other offense that a sentencing authority may have relied upon when it sentenced the person with respect to such crime.
- Prohibits a State from denying an application for DNA testing made by a prisoner in State custody who is under sentence of death if specified conditions apply.
- Provides grants to prosecutors for DNA testing programs.
- Establishes the National Commission on Capital Representation.
- Withholds funds from States not complying with standards for capital representation.
- Provides for capital defense incentive grants and resource grants.
- Increases compensation in Federal cases, and sets forth provisions regarding compensation in State cases, where an individual is unjustly sentenced to death.
- Adds a certification requirement in Federal death penalty prosecutions.
- Expresses the sense of Congress regarding the execution of juvenile offenders and the mentally retarded.
Source: House Resolution Sponsorship 01-HR912 on Mar 7, 2001
Rated 88% by the NCJA, indicating a "tough-on-crime" stance.
Davis scores 88% by the NCJA on crime issues
OnTheIssues.org interprets the 2005 NCJA scores as follows:
- 0%- 74%: "soft-on-crime" record (approx. 133 members)
- 75%- 84%: mixed record on criminal justice (approx. 114 members)
- 85%-100%: "tough-on-crime" record (approx. 216 members)
About the NCJA (from their website, www.ncja.org): The National Criminal Justice Association (NCJA) exists to promote the development of justice systems in states, tribal nations, and units of local government that enhance public safety; prevent and reduce the harmful effects of criminal and delinquent behavior on victims, individuals and communities; adjudicate defendants and sanction offenders fairly and justly; and that are effective and efficient.
Toward this end, the Association:
- Maintains the focus of state, tribal, local and federal governments on the needs of the criminal and juvenile justice systems;
- Represents state, tribal, and local criminal and juvenile justice system concerns to the federal government;
- Provides support for the development of criminal and juvenile justice policy for the nation's governors and tribal leaders;
- Supports the public and all levels of government in the achievement of public safety by the coordination of education, community and social service systems, in addition to law enforcement and criminal justice measures;
- Serves as a catalyst for the careful consideration and promotion of effective and efficient criminal and juvenile justice policies and practices;
- Advocates for the commitment of adequate resources to support all components of the criminal and juvenile justice systems; and
- Coordinates between the different branches and levels of government and promotes broad philosophical agreement.
Source: NCJA website 05n-NCJA on Dec 31, 2005
More prisons, more enforcement, effective death penalty.
Davis signed the Contract with America:
[As part of the Contract with America, within 100 days we pledge to bring to the House Floor the following bill]:
The Taking Back Our Streets Act:
An anti-crime package including stronger truth in sentencing, “good faith” exclusionary rule exemptions, effective death penalty provisions, and cuts in social spending from this summer’s crime bill to fund prison construction and additional law enforcement to keep people secure in their neighborhoods and kids safe in their schools.
Source: Contract with America 93-CWA4 on Sep 27, 1994
Page last updated: Aug 12, 2008