OnTheIssuesLogo

Samuel Alito on Corporations

Supreme Court Justice (nominated by Pres. George W. Bush 2005)


Bundling goods to large purchasers is not monopolistic

SEN. DEWINE: Many hospitals buy their supplies through group purchasing organizations known as GPOs. Often GPOs reach deals with major suppliers to buy items in bundles; in other words buy a number of different products and those suppliers in order to get discounts on all of the products. In 3M v. LePage, 3M, which sells Scotch tape, was selling it as part of a bundle with other products. The result was that LePage's, which was offering a cheaper, competing tape, was having a hard time getting stores to sell its tape because if the stores did, they would have to give up the chance to save money on all the other 3M products that they carry. The majority ruled against 3M, but you dissented.

ALITO: This was a monopolization case. 3M was not selling the product below its cost. 3M, because of its scale or because it was more efficient, was able to produce its product more cheaply. That factor persuaded us that there wasn't sufficient evidence of monopolization here.

Source: Sam Alito Senate Confirmation Hearings Jan 11, 2006

Other Justices on Corporations: Samuel Alito on other issues:
Samuel Alito
Stephen Breyer
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Anthony Kennedy
Sandra Day O'Connor
William Rehnquist
John Roberts
Antonin Scalia
David Souter
John Paul Stevens
Clarence Thomas

Other Political Leaders:
George W. Bush
Al Gore
Ralph Nader
Hillary Clinton
Elizabeth Dole
John McCain
Robert Reich
Janet Reno
Jesse Ventura

Party Platforms:
Democratic Platform
Green Platform
Libertarian Platform
Republican Platform
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families/Children
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Infrastructure/Technology
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty

Page last updated: 3/27/2008