Search for...
issues2000

Bill Clinton on Defense


Decrease force size but increase quality

I have kept my pledge to maintain and modernize our defense capabilities. We completed a comprehensive review of our military needs for the future and restructured our forces. Even as the size of our forces decreased, their capabilities, readiness, and qualitative edge have increased.
  • As a result, our military and intelligence forces are more mobile, agile, precise, flexible, smart, and ready than ever before. Today the mere threat of our force can deter would-be aggressors.
    Source: Between Hope and History, by Bill Clinton, p.148-149 Jan 1, 1996

    Finally, not a single Russian nuke is aimed at US

    The dissolution of the Soviet Union created 4 nuclear powers-Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, & Ukraine-where once there had been just one. I saw it as my highest responsibility to continue the work of my predecessors to reduce the threat from Russia and to eliminate it entirely from the other 3 newly independent states. Today, for the first time in decades, not a single Russian nuclear missile is aimed at an American city. We are cutting Russian and American arsenals by 2/3 from their Cold War height.
    Source: Between Hope and History, by Bill Clinton, p.154-155 Jan 1, 1996

    Build a sensible missile defense, not “Star Wars”

    It only takes a lump of plutonium the size of a soda can to build a bomb, and rogue states are an ever-present threat. It will be more than a decade before any such state will have the ability to launch a long-range missile attack against the continental US, but in the meantime we must build a sensible national missile defense program. There are some in the Congress who want to revive the recklessly expensive and extreme “Star Wars” scheme-a costly system that is neither necessary nor prudent and that would violate the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. What we need is a practical, smart missile defense based on real, not theoretical, threats, and that is exactly what we are getting. We’re already spending $3 billion a year to develop such a defense by 2000, one that will be deployable by 2003, if needed-well before the threat becomes real. In addition, we are beefing up programs to defend against existing threats such as short- and medium-range missile attacks against our troops and allies.
    Source: Between Hope and History, by Bill Clinton, p.156 Jan 1, 1996

    Other candidates on Defense: Bill Clinton on other issues:
    Pat Buchanan
    George W. Bush
    Al Gore
    Ralph Nader

    Political Leaders:
    John Ashcroft
    Hillary Clinton
    Elizabeth Dole
    John McCain
    Robert Reich
    Janet Reno
    Jesse Ventura

    Opinion Leaders:
    Noam Chomsky
    Bill Clinton
    Jesse Jackson
    Rush Limbaugh
    Ross Perot
    Ronald Reagan

    Party Platforms:
    Democratic Platform
    Green Platform
    Libertarian Platform
    Republican Platform
    Abortion
    Budget/Economy
    China
    Civil Rights
    Crime
    Defense
    Drugs
    Education
    Environment
    Families
    Foreign Policy
    Free Trade
    Govt. Reform
    Gun Control
    Health Care
    Immigration
    Labor
    Principles
    School Choice
    Social Security
    Tax Reform
    Technology
    War & Peace
    Welfare