Search for...
OnTheIssuesLogo

Paul O'Neill on Budget & Economy


Bush team not pushing Reaganite supply-side arguments

Instead of pushing Reaganite supply-side arguments, the Bush team is stressing the demand side: It proclaims that reducing taxes will put money in consumers’ pockets and so prime the economic pump. Consider, first, the deafening supply-side silence. Back when Reagan was pushing his first tax plan, his people preached that big cuts in marginal rates would sharpen incentives for workers, and that harder work would in turn boost output.

Now contrast that with Treasury Secy. O’Neill’s performance before the House tax committee last Tuesday. At one point, [he was asked] how much additional economic growth we might anticipate from the president’s tax plan. Far from jumping at this opportunity, O’Neill evaded the question. “I suppose I could give you something for the record,” he replied, but neglected to do so. In his extensive testimony, O’Neill made the supply-side argument about work incentives only in passing, and was even more diffident about the link between those incentives and faster growth.

Source: Sebastian Mallaby, Washington Post, Page A33 Feb 19, 2001

Committed to maintaining strong dollar

Treasury Secretary O’Neill insisted today that the Bush administration is committed to maintaining a strong dollar and rejected speculation that the US might encourage a drop in its value to bolster economic recovery by spurring American exports. O’Neill also sought to reassure his peers [at the G-7 Summit] that he is convinced the US will stage a solid recovery this year and resume its role as the locomotive driving economic growth.

O’Neill was quoted last week saying: “We are not pursuing, as often said, a policy of a strong dollar. In my opinion, a strong dollar is the result of a strong economy.“ The comments, which currency markets viewed as a modification of the Clinton administration’s emphasis on a strong dollar, caused the dollar to plummet in value against the euro until the Treasury Department issued a statement denying a change in policy. O’Neill seemed exasperated at how billions of dollars can churn on currency exchange markets based on a strained interpretation of his words.

Source: William Drozdiak, Washington Post, Page A31 Feb 18, 2001

Transform old economy to new economy

O’Neill’s unique experience transforming an old economy firm into a new economy success has been chronicled as a study by the Harvard Business School, and studied in business schools across the nation. O’Neill has gained valuable insights into international finance and the global economy as head of a major corporation with 140, 000 employees spread across 36 nations.
Source: Dept. of Treasury web site, “Secretary’s Bio” Feb 3, 2001

Other candidates on Budget & Economy: Paul O'Neill on other issues:
Pat Buchanan
George W. Bush
Al Gore
Ralph Nader

Political Leaders:
John Ashcroft
Hillary Clinton
Elizabeth Dole
John McCain
Robert Reich
Janet Reno
Jesse Ventura

Opinion Leaders:
Noam Chomsky
Bill Clinton
Jesse Jackson
Rush Limbaugh
Ross Perot
Ronald Reagan

Party Platforms:
Democratic Platform
Green Platform
Libertarian Platform
Republican Platform
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families/Children
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Infrastructure/Technology
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty