State of Oregon Archives: on Government Reform
Voted NO on looser campaign finance reporting
SB 270: Campaign Finance Reporting (Bill Failed House, 5-54); Conger voted Nay.
Vote to pass a bill that modifies requirements for campaign finance reporting and limits the maximum fine imposed for failing to submit
required statements concerning contributions.
Source: VoteSmart summary: 2014 Oregon Senate legislative session
- Repeals a portion of existing law which includes in the definition of "contribution" unfulfilled pledges, subscriptions, agreements or promises, whether they are legally
enforceable or not.
- Repeals the requirement that candidates or treasurers of political committees report account numbers when filing statements of organization.
Limits the maximum fine imposed for failing to submit required statements concerning contributions to no more than $5,000 in a calendar month.
Nuclear option: Allow confirmation of Obama's appointees
Ever since they arrived in the Senate, Jeff Merkley and Tom Udall have had one huge, seemingly insurmountable goal: To change Senate rules on the filibuster. On Thursday, they won.
"This is a terrific vote for the US Senate," said Merkley. "The
American people want this institution to function. They want to see it take on the big issues. They don't want to see the entire calendar of the year eaten up by paralyzing process on nominations."
Filibuster reform has long been a marquee issue for
Merkley (OR) & Udall (NM), who are part of a new breed of Senate reformers who have never served in the minority. Now, they're looking to expand their change to filibuster rules governing legislation--but that's going to be a much harder sell.
of the two first-term senators say they led a movement they don't even understand--they have only served in the majority, longtime GOP senators charge, and don't appreciate ways that the filibuster has been used to the benefit of the country in the past.
Source: Politico.com coverage of 2014 Oregon Senate race
Nov 21, 2013
Gordon Harold Smith:
Increase individuals campaign donation limit
Smith supports the following principles regarding Campaign Finance and Government Reform:
Source: Oregon Congressional Election 2008 Political Courage Test
Jun 18, 2008
- Support increasing the amount individuals are permitted to contribute to federal campaigns.
Support giving the President the power of the line item veto for items concerning appropriations.
Good government follows clearly outlined public procedures
Parking lot politics is not good politics. Sometimes the result may seem to produce innovation, but it robs the citizens of the right to participate in the democratic process.
Same-sex marriage policy, for example, while an important issue to many Oregonians, was ‘railroaded’ past the people of Multnomah Country without the benefit of open, democratic debate and decision-making.
It creates the unfortunate situation in which the value of the policies in question don’t get addressed and must take second place to whims of those currently in positions of power.
It is not a right use of the people’s trust. Good Government is government that follows the public procedures clearly outlined in the laws that govern our land.
Source: 2004 Senate campaign website, broussardfororegon.com
Aug 11, 2004
Fix budget with government structure change not tax hike
Oregonians should oppose the January 2003 income tax increase measure because it simply pumps more income into government without changing the way government does business and it will further deepen Oregon’s recession.
As Oregon’s new Governor, in January, I will collaborate with the legislature to implement emergency structural changes to fill the budget gap without raising taxes, without hurting education for our kids, and without endangering our neighborhoods.
Source: 2002 Gubernatorial website, MannixForOregon.org, “Budget”
Oct 15, 2002
Stop corporate funding of elections
“We can’t have corporations underwrite our elections process,” she said, adding, “it is also a question of ethics for the politicians.”
Source: U-wire article, “Native Week at Oregon State”
May 23, 2000
Spending limits on campaigns, plus full disclosure
Q: Do you support requiring full and timely disclosure of campaign finance information?
Q: Do you support imposing spending limits on state level political campaigns?
Would you vote to ratify an amendment to the U.S. Constitution requiring an annual balanced federal budget?
Q: Do you support using vote-by-mail for all elections?
Source: Oregon State 1998 National Political Awareness Test
Nov 1, 1998
Limit individual campaign donations; require full disclosure
Do you support limiting the following types of contributions to state legislative candidates?
Source: Oregon Gubernatorial 1998 National Political Awareness Test
Nov 1, 1998
- Q: Individual ?
- Q: PAC ?
- Q: Corporate ?
- Q: Do you support requiring full and timely disclosure of campaign finance information?
Page last updated: Dec 17, 2013