Arlen Specter in Alito Confirmation Hearings


On Principles & Values: Senate speaks to entire Supreme Court during hearings

SEN. SPECTER: Let me take up the Americans with Disability Act. Justice Scalia criticized [Congress' ADA policy. That policy was based on] a voluminous record--13 congressional hearings, 30,000 people were surveyed.

ALITO: [Scalia's dissent] addresses a difficult problem the court has grappled with over the years, and that is the scope of Congress' authority under the 14th Amendment. Justice Scalia's [argument] is that Congress doesn't have additional authority to enact prophylactic measures outside of the area of race.

SPECTER: It's up to the Congress to have hearings, up to the Congress to find facts, up to the Congress to find out what goes on in the real world. We're speaking not only to you, Judge Alito, but to the court. The court watches these proceedings. They ought to know what the Congress thinks about making us schoolchildren or challenging our method of reasoning. We're considering legislation which would give Congress standing to go into the Supreme Court to uphold our cases.

Source: Sam Alito Senate Confirmation Hearings Jan 11, 2006

On Technology: Supreme Court proceedings should be televised

SEN. SPECTER: I want to move now to a subject on efforts to have television in the Supreme Court of the United States, a subject very near and dear to my heart. I've been pushing it for a long time. The Supreme Court said in the Richmond newspaper case v. Virginia, "The rights of a public trial belong not just to the accused, but to the public and the press, as well. Such openness has long been recognized as an indispensable attribute in the Anglo-Saxon trial." Why shouldn't the Supreme Court be open to the public with television?

ALITO: I had the opportunity to deal with this issue, actually, in relation to my own court. All the courts of appeals were given the authority to allow their oral arguments to be televised if they wanted. I argued that we should do it. I thought that it would be a useful. The issue is a little bit different on the Supreme Court. At least one of the justices has said that a television camera would make its way into the Supreme Court room over his dead body.

Source: Sam Alito Senate Confirmation Hearings Jan 11, 2006

On Government Reform: Nominees only answer as many questions as they have to

While I personally consider it inappropriate to ask a nominee how he would vote on a specific matter likely to come before the court, senators may ask whatever they choose and the nominee is similarly free to respond as he chooses. It has been my experience that the hearings are a subtle minuet with nominees answering as many questions as they think they have to in order to be confirmed.
Source: Sam Alito Senate Confirmation Hearings Jan 9, 2006

The above quotations are from Samuel Alito, Senate confirmation hearings for his Supreme Court nomination, January 2006 (plus commentary).
Click here for a profile of Arlen Specter.
Arlen Specter on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)