Newt Gingrich in Meet the Press: Meet the Candidates 2007 series, with Tim Russert

On Foreign Policy: We need a dramatically expanded use of statecraft

Sen. DODD: Why aren't we using statecraft? What's happened to the utilization of other tools available to us--our economic, our political, our diplomatic resources--which are almost been neglected in this entire process?

GINGRICH: I partially agree with Sen. Dodd. I am not comfortable either with the current situation in Iraq, nor am I comfortable around the world with our extraordinarily limited use of statecraft. The North Koreans are cheating on their agreement on nuclear weapons. We still do no have control of Waziristan in northwest Pakistan, where Bin Laden's probably hiding. We have been told by the UN that the Iranians are now producing at least 1300 centrifuges, producing nuclear material, and that they almost certainly will have a nuclear weapon within a year. You look around the world, the forces of freedom are on retreat, the forces that are anti-freedom, pro-dictatorship, and, in some cases, purely evil are on offense. We need a dramatically expanded ability to use statecraft.

Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series May 20, 2007

On Homeland Security: Military tribunals to lock people up the way Lincoln did

Q: Specifically, how would you win the war in Iraq militarily?

A: 1) You would empower General Petraeus. You'd pass the supplemental immediately. You'd give him the money. 2) You would encourage the Iraqis to triple the size of their regular army. 3) You would encourage the development of a military tribunal system to lock people up the way Abraham Lincoln would've done it. 4) You would establish a nationwide ID card with biometrics so you can actually track everybody in the country. 5) You would make sure that the State Department actually staffed the embassy with people in favor of winning the war and you actually had your fully equipped intelligence and economic development teams. 6) Bring enormous pressure to bear on Iran to cut off everything [assisting with the Iraqi insurgency]. So, we ought to do what it takes to win, not tolerate legislating defeat.

Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series May 20, 2007

On Principles & Values: Thinking about thinking about running; decision by October

Q: We're curious about whether you're a candidate. Let me show you what you've said. In December 2003: "I doubt it very much," running for president. Then in May 2006, "I doubt it." Then in December 2006, "Of course I'm thinking about it." And last week, "It is a great possibility." As we sit on this day, May 20th, 2007, will Newt Gingrich run for president?

A: I promise, if after the September 27th American Solutions workshop, I do decide to run, I will come back and be on "Meet the Press."

Q: So you're thinking about running?

A: Well, I'm thinking about thinking about running. But I won't do anything at all about the possibility of running until after September 29th when we have our second workshop.

Q: So by October you should have a decision?

A: By October I'm confident that we'll be chatting.

Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series May 20, 2007

On War & Peace: Deadline for Iraqi withdrawal is legislating defeat

Q [to Dodd]: Should the US set a firm deadline for the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq?

DODD: I believe we should. My view is there's a greater likelihood that the Iraqis, if they understand that this is not an open-ended process here, and that we're willing to help train troops and help on counter-terrorism, but that come the first of April next year, our military participation is over with.

GINGRICH: I disagree deeply. There are young men and women risking their lives in uniform who are dramatically going to be demoralized by the idea of who's the last person to die trying to win in Iraq. If we have to set a deadline, then let's set it for next Tuesday. Let's get out of there. Because I think the idea that we're going to set a magic moment a year from now or 11 months from now or 10 months from now basically says we are prepared to accept defeat if the deadline's real and we can't find a way to get to victory, then we will have legislated defeat.

Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series May 20, 2007

On War & Peace: Even if Iraq IS a civil war, people have won civil wars

Q [to Dodd]: If you withdrew American troops by a date certain, what happened if total civil war erupted?

DODD: I don't think you have to ask the question hypothetically, that's what's going on today. We're in the middle of a civil war.

GINGRICH: Even if you accept that this is a civil war, people have won civil wars. And the fact is, civil wars are hard. The Second World War was hard. Guadalcanal was hard. If we'd had today's Congress during Guadalcanal, the number of people who had said beating the Japanese is too hard, let's find a negotiated peace, would have been amazing.

DODD: I disagree with that.

GINGRICH: We are in a worldwide war, and, and I'm going to use a word that seems to be unfashionable in Washington. We need to think about winning this worldwide war. We need to understand that every week that goes by there are more young people recruited into al-Qaeda and into the various Iranian terrorist organizations.

Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series May 20, 2007

On War & Peace: Pressure Iran to cut off Iraq, including blockading Iran

[We should] say to the Iranians, "If you don't cut off everything you're doing, we'll begin to bring enormous pressure to bear with you," if necessary, blockading the flow of gasoline into Iran, which has to import 40% of its gasoline because it only has one refinery in the entire country.
Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series May 20, 2007

On War & Peace: Iraq & Syria are enemies--ok to talk if we understand that

GINGRICH [to Dodd]: The Baker-Hamilton Commission suggested that we engage Iran & Syria, who are our enemies in the region. The fact is the Iranians want us defeated. The Iranians are providing weapons, training and money to defeat us. This would be like saying, "Why don't we turn to Nazi Germany to help us manage fascist Italy?"

DODD: The idea we don't talk to the Syrians & Iranians in a moment like this, I think, is terribly naive and dangerous for the country, in my view.

GINGRICH: I'm perfectly happy to talk to Syrians and the Iranians. We've had a number of secretaries of state who've gone to Damascus, several of whom have been snubbed. Our secretary of state was snubbed the other day by the Iranians. I just want us to understand who we're talking about. Reagan had no doubt that the Soviet Union was an evil empire. He had a clear vision of the Cold War. He said, "We win, they lose." And he did what you're calling for. They unraveled the Soviet empire, largely without firing a shot.

Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series May 20, 2007

On War & Peace: French didn't abandon colonies in 1776; even when losing

GINGRICH: Prime Minister Maliki is doing the best he can in a chaotic environment. Imagine we were the French in the 1700s, saying, "Well, should we really send aid to these guys? I mean, they've lost New York. George Washington's lost all these campaign & had no major victories. I mean, why are we sending money over there? This is just bad money after good."

DODD: Equating the American Revolution with a civil war in Iraq today, please....

GINGRICH: No, it's exactly the same point. We went from 1775 with the first Continental Congress to 1789 when we adopted the Constitution. We had 14 years of confusion. Now, if you were advising the French in late 1776, what would you have said then?

DODD: We had people who knew what they wanted in the end. The Iraqis don't, apparently. A survey said over 50% of Iraqis thinks it's all right to kill Americans. If we go back to the American Revolution I doubt you would have had 51% of the Americans saying it's all right to kill the French coming here.

Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series May 20, 2007

On War & Peace: Iraqi Army risk their lives & take more casualties than US

Q: Why are the Iraqis apparently unwilling to step up and shed blood?

A: We have these stunningly self-destructive reporting systems. The fact is there are about 139,000 Iraqi troops who are out on patrol with Americans who are risking their lives. The fact is the Iraqis are taking a lot more casualties than we are. And there's something wrong [when] people who are standing next to us getting killed are dishonored. We say, "Oh, that's not really good enough." Look at all the Iraqis who walked to vote risking death. Look at all the Iraqis who have now twice voted, including Iraqi women who were engaged. The same thing in Afghanistan where women knew the Taliban was going to target to kill them. Imagine in the Second World War, you say, "Well what have the British done recently? Why are we helping Great Britain, or what, what have the Greeks done or the Poles done or the Belgians done?"

Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series May 20, 2007

On War & Peace: Date for withdrawal means terrorists exalt & follow us home

Q: If we set a firm date for withdrawal of US troops in Iraq, what happens?

GINGRICH: I believe we send a signal to enemies to wait patiently and destroy the country as soon as we leave. A signal to our own troops to cease patrolling and do everything you can not to be the last person killed on behalf of something that Congress has decried will be a defeat. A signal to our allies around the world that we're unreliable. And we will have dramatically expanded the incentives of the terrorists. And I think you'll see a dramatic upsurge. If this Congress passes a definitive end of American involvement, every enemy we have on the planet will exalt & claim it's an enormous victory, and they will increase their recruiting. They don't plan to stop in Baghdad. They are coming here as soon as they can get here.

DODD: We're bogged down in a situation here where we're losing credibility, we're losing our moral value. The great moral reputation of the US has suffered terribly as a result of this.

Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series May 20, 2007

The above quotations are from Meet the Press: Meet the Candidates 2008 series, individual interviews with Tim Russert, throughout 2007.
Click here for a profile of Newt Gingrich.
Click here for Newt Gingrich on all issues.
Newt Gingrich on other issues:
Civil Rights
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Social Security
Tax Reform
Please consider a donation to!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
(We rely on your support!)