Search for...
issues2000

More headlines: Hillary Clinton on Principles & Values

(Following are older quotations. Click here for main quotations.)


McCain and Bush are awfully hard to tell apart these days

McCain says the economy is fundamentally sound. John McCain doesn’t think that 47 million people without health insurance is a crisis. John McCain wants to privatize Social Security. And in 2008, he still thinks it’s okay when women don’t earn equal pay for equal work. With an agenda like that, it makes sense that George Bush and John McCain will be together next week in the Twin Cities. Because these days they’re awfully hard to tell apart
Source: Speech at 2008 Democratic National Convention Aug 27, 2008

GovWatch: Maybe won popular vote, but only delegates count

Sen. Clinton said after her Puerto Rico victory on June 1, “We are winning the popular vote. The people have spoken. So when the voting concludes, neither Sen. Obama nor I will have the number of delegates to be the nominee. I will lead the popular vote. He will maintain a slight lead in the delegate count.”

Whatever Clinton might say, there is considerable doubt about her claim. It’s only true if she includes all the people who voted for her in Florida, plus including Michigan while excluding all “uncommitted” votes, and including caucus participants in IA, NV, ME, & WA.

The more important point is that the popular vote has nothing to do with the presidential nominating process, which is decided by delegates. Most estimates put Obama within 45 votes of the 2,118 needed to secure the nomination, while Clinton is 200 votes away.

Our judgment: This is one of those cases where the candidate can provide some data to back up her claim, but the claim itself is essentially meaningless.

Source: GovWatch on 2008: Washington Post analysis Jun 2, 2008

Visited Bosnian war zone, but mistake to call it sniper fire

Q: How do you reconcile your credibility when you’ve made those misrepresentative comments about what happened getting off the plane in Bosnia? [Clinton claimed to have arrived under sniper fire, which was shown to be untrue by a video from the event].

Source: 2008 Philadelphia primary debate, on eve of PA primary Apr 16, 2008

Using passages from other’s speeches is change you can Xerox

If your candidacy is going to be about words, then they should be your own words. That’s a very simple proposition. Lifting whole passages from someone else’s speeches is not change you can believe in, it’s change you can Xerox. If you look at the YouTube of these videos, it does raise questions. There is no doubt that Obama is a passionate, eloquent speaker, and I applaud him for that. But when you look at what we face in this country, we do need to unite the country, but we have to unite it for purpose around very specific goals. It is not enough to say, “Let’s come together.” We’ve got to look hard at the difficult challenges we face, especially after Bush leaves the White House. The world will breathe a sigh of relief once he is gone. But then we’ve got to do the hard work of not just bringing the country together, but overcoming a lot of the entrenched opposition to the very ideas that both of us believe in, and for some of us have been fighting for, for a very long time.
Source: 2008 Democratic debate at University of Texas in Austin Feb 21, 2008

Michigan and Florida primary ballots should count

Q: Michigan was punished for having moved up their primary date and their delegates are not supposed to be seated. You won the Michigan primary, but your name was the only one on the ballot.

A: I think that both Michigan and Florida should count becaus these are two states we have to carry. This is not so much about the ins and outs of the DNC as to whether the Democrats are going to win in the fall. In Michigan, my opponents ran a very vigorous campaign to get people to vote uncontested, and I still won a majority. In Florida, 2.7 million people showed up and said we will not be disenfranchised again. They weren’t involved in the rule making. Give them a chance.

Q: How is that fair when Obama didn’t get a chance to go head-to-head?

A: People follow the campaign [from other states].

Q: One suggestion has been to have a second primary.

A: A second primary would be obviously very expensive. I don’t know who is going to pay for it. The people who voted thought they were voting in a primary.

Source: 2008 Politico pre-Potomac Primary interview Feb 11, 2008

Will release tax returns during general election campaign

Q: Cheney & Bush were famous for making deals behind closed doors. How can we believe that you are not going to do the same if you do not do something as simple as release your tax returns? We received this question over 300 times.

A: Well, the Obama campaign is telling people to send in that question. I’m going to release my tax returns when I’m the nominee. My entire ethics statement is on record at the Senate. I liquidated all of my holdings. I’m holding everything in cash so that there’s not even a question of conflict. But transparency is an important issue. And it doesn’t only go to your personal finances but Senator Obama has some questions to answer about his dealings with one of his largest contributors, Exelon, a big nuclear power company. Apparently he cut some deals behind closed doors to protect them from full disclosure in the nuclear industry. And we still don’t have a lot of answers about Senator Obama and his dealings with Mr. Rezko.

Source: 2008 Politico pre-Potomac Primary interview Feb 11, 2008

I’ve been vetted; disinformation has all been recycled

Q: Sen. Obama has been taunting you on the question of electability. And several conservative commentators also have said you may be the only Democrat who can unify a badly demoralized Republican Party. Why should Democrats give Republicans the candidate they’re looking for?

A: I’m not so sure that anybody on the Democratic side should take seriously what any Republican commentators say. I’ve been around long enough to know that there’s often a certain level of disinformation that’s going on. One thing you know about me is that I have been vetted. I’ve been through this. I understand exactly what is coming at me, and there isn’t any new information. It’s just more of the same. It’s been recycled over and over again. I don’t think we can say that about my opponent. My track record on being able to take on Republicans is really a proven one. Somebody told me today that Sen. Obama has never had a negative ad run against him. Well, get ready, because if he’s the nominee we will see a lot of that.

Source: 2008 Politico pre-Potomac Primary interview Feb 11, 2008

America needs election debate about country’s direction

Q: [to Clinton and McCain]: Are you two looking forward to possibly facing each other in November?

McCAIN: I think we will have a very spirited [race].

CLINTON: Well, I think we both have our hands full.

McCAIN: Yeah, I think we’ll have very respectful but very spirited debate. I think that Senator Clinton would be the first to acknowledge, as she’s already mentioned in several appearances and debates with the Democrats that we’ll have very significant differences. And I think the American people will see those differences and make a judgment.

Q: Senator Clinton, do you have a response to that?

CLINTON: No, I agree with that. I think that John and I will have a respectful debate, but we do have serious differences about the direction of the country and what we think should be done. But that’s exactly the kind of election that our country needs right now, and I’m looking forward to it.

McCAIN: Do you want to start that debate now?

Source: 2008 Fox News interview: “Choosing the President” series Feb 3, 2008

FactCheck: Obama, Bill, & Hillary all praised Ronald Reagan

Obama has been taking heat for praising Ronald Reagan in a Jan. 14 interview: “The 1980 election was different. I mean, I think Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not, and in a way that Bill Clinton did not. He put us on a fundamentally different path, because the country was ready for it.”

In the Jan. 21 debate, when Obama was criticized by Clinton for supporting Republican ideas, he responded, “The irony of this is that you provided much more fulsome praise of Ronald Reagan in a book by Tom Brokaw that’s being published right now, as did Bill Clinton in the past.“

Obama is correct: Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have lauded Reagan’s political skills. Tom Brokaw’s ”Boom! Voices of the Sixties“ quotes Clinton as saying that Reagan was ”a child of the Depression“ who understood pressures on the working and middle class.

We’ll leave it to others to decide who’s praising Reagan more. The fact is that Bill and Hillary have done it, not just Obama.

Source: FactCheck.org on 2008 Congressional Black Caucus Dem. Debate Jan 21, 2008

AdWatch: Clinton didn’t cause Peter Paul fraud investigation

In a video that has logged millions of views on the Internet, Peter Paul, a felon who helped produce a gala fundraiser for the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton’s 2000 Senate campaign, makes a number of false or misleading charges. Among them:
Source: FactCheck's AdWatch on 2008 independent Internet video Jan 18, 2008

AdWatch: “Hillary: The Movie” counts as campaign ad

Citizens United, a group that long has been involved in efforts against the Clintons, is selling “Hillary: the Movie” online and was in federal court recently over its attempt to run ads for the film in primary states during election season. The ads contain clips from the movie, including one of former Clinton adviser Dick Morris saying that Hillary Clinton “is the closest thing we have to a European socialist.”

A three-judge panel ruled this week that the ads amounted to electioneering and could be run only with a disclaimer and only if Citizens United disclosed its donors to the FEC.

Given the passions, pro and con, that Hillary and Bill Clinton seem to ignite, it’s a good bet we can expect more such films before the election is over.

Source: FactCheck's AdWatch on 2008 independent Internet video Jan 18, 2008

Vince Foster suicide due to public bashing in editorial

For the last month of Vince Foster’s life, Hillary spoke with him at most once. No one has presented evidence that Vince and Hillary were lovers. But they had been, in some ways, closer than lovers. Hillary was totally unguarded in his presence.

Foster was stressed about the internal investigation of the Travel Office firings. Particularly grating to Foster was the series of destructive editorials in The Wall Street Journal. On June 17, the paper printed a column entitled “Who is Vince Foster?” On June 24, in “Vincent Foster’s Victory”, Foster was attacked for his partially successful appeal defending the procedures of Hillary’s health care task force.

It was increasingly hard for Foster to fight for Hillary. When he left Arkansas, he expected the relationship with Hillary to be as deep as ever. The last thing he expected is that it would turn upside down.

The Journal tied Foster & Hillary to the Travel Office firings in yet another editorial on July 19. On July 20, police found Foster dead.

Source: A Woman in Charge, by Carl Bernstein, p.336-340 Jun 5, 2007

At her core, Hillary is an idealistic activist

Hillary is a competent, ambitious, hardworking woman with a quick & curious mind. But she is also a calculating, controlling, power-driven, insecure personality not limited by principles, ideals, or values.

Hillary was once a passionate liberal, a left wing devotee, a radical feminist, & an antiwar activist. Now, 40 years later, the idealism that once had a claim on her heart seems all but gone.

Ideals create a passion for something good, & drive you to be part of a cause bigger than yourself. Hillary’s early aspirations offered a place of comfort, a sense of belonging. I wonder if Hillary has regrets as she looks back at the wide-eyed liberal & remembers all the passion that flowed through her veins, all the excitement of the cause. I wonder if she regrets trading it all in for fame & power.

Hillary is the same today as she was yesterday. It is not from lack of trying--the makeover team has been working overtime to sweeten & soften her--but they have not laid a glove on her true nature.

Source: The Extreme Makeover, by Bay Buchanan, p. 79-81 May 14, 2007

Poll: support among women 13% higher than among men

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton accepted her party’s nomination for a second term as the New York senator in the Buffalo convention, but she sure didn’t sound as if she was running only for that seat. A new ABC News/Washington Post Poll shows a huge gender gap among Clinton supporters, even among Democrats, with women more likely to support Clinton than men by a margin of 13 points. The gap continues with Republicans, where three in 10 women indicated a willingness to support Clinton compared with two out of 10 Republican men.

While Clinton has proved popular with the Democratic base in places like New York City, she is much weaker with the political center, the moderates and Independents in states like Ohio and Florida that she will need to win a general election. A daunting 42 percent of all Americans say they’d never vote for her for president.

Source: 2008 speculation by Jake Tapper & Drew Millhon, ABC News May 31, 2006

Early frontrunner based on name recognition and money

Dick Morris, the political consultant who advised the Clintons in the White House & who roughly personifies what people hate about political consultants, published a book called “Condi vs Hillary”, touting the thesis that only Condoleezza Rice could foil Clinton’s ambitions.

When Republican types meet, the Hillary-chat is the same. Formidable candidate... shedloads of money... unrivalled name recognition... impressive job in the Senate... husband a big asset... great hairdo.

Among Democrats, you will find many who say she SHOULD be the next president-her admirers remain legion-but you will be very hard pressed to find many who say with confidence she WILL.

Early polls indicate that while she’s streets ahead for the Democratic nomination, she gets soundly beaten by all the most plausible Republicans. So, among Democrats the snatches of conversation are like this: Hated on the Left... impossibly high negatives... terrible performer in public... too much Bill baggage... awful pantsuits.

Source: 2008 speculation by Gerard Baker in The Peninsula (Qatar) Apr 8, 2006

Op-Ed: positioning herself as voice of reason & centrism

Bill taught Hillary the power of cutting against the image of your political party. In 1992, Bill ran as a “New Democrat,” advocating capital punishment, backing a work requirement for welfare, pledging to balance the budget & pass a middle-class tax cut When Clinton criticized black rap star Sister Souljah for seeming to advocate black violence, he distinguished himself from the tapestry of liberalism that had been the backdrop of the failed candidacies of McGovern & Dukakis. Now, against the history of another failed liberal candidacy, Hillary is set to emerge as the new Clinton, the moderate savior of a left-addicted party. Playing off the extreme liberalism of the new DNC chair, Howard Dean, Hillary will position herself as the voice of reason & centrism.

But Hillary’s newfound centrism focuses only on issues at the margins. She may attack sex on TV or call for more values in public life, but when the chips are down, she votes like a solid liberal, backing her party more than 90% of the time.

Source: Condi vs. Hillary, by Dick Morris, p. 15-16 Oct 11, 2005

OpEd: Hillary is emblematic of extreme leftist ideals

Hillary’s appeal is almost metaphysical. She represents the transcendent dreams of the feminist, the gay rights advocate, and the eco activist.

But she also connects with the murky dreams of millions of suburban women who quietly enter the ballot booth and assert their independence from their family’s party affiliation.

Source: Madame Hillary, by R. Emmett Tyrell, p. 21 Feb 25, 2004

NYC offices costs taxpayers $514,000 per year

The posh offices of Hillary Rodham Clinton snapped up on the Upper East Side of Manhattan will cost taxpayers in excess of $514,148 per year. The tab is more than double the amount paid by Hillary’s fellow Democrat Charles Schumer, whose offices are in the same neighborhood. No one should have been surprised that when it came to selecting her office, Hillary pushed the envelope to its absolute limit and squeezed every available dime from the American taxpayers.
Source: The Final Days, by Barbara Olson, p. 52 Oct 25, 2001

Supported teacher tests & China women despite unpopularity

Q: Can you give me one example where you have taken an unpopular course despite what your advisers say because you thought it was right?

CLINTON: Well, I’ll give you two. You know, back in 1983 - when I was probably the first person in the country who said that we should test teachers - that was extremely unpopular, and it caused quite an uproar. But it was the right thing to do, and I still believe today that we should be testing new teachers and raising standards for our teachers. And then in 1995, when I went to China to speak on behalf of women’s rights, there were many people, inside and outside our own government, people literally around the world, who said I shouldn’t go, that I shouldn’t make a speech, that I shouldn’t criticize the Chinese government.

Source: NY Senate debate on NBC Oct 28, 2000

Get New York a fair share of budget surplus & Medicaid

Q: As a junior senator, will you be able to ensure that N.Y. will receive its fair share of federal aid?

CLINTON: One of the issues I’ve been talking about is how we can get more of New York’s fair share. We have a chance to do that because we have a surplus. One of the biggest injustices is the Medicaid formula. I’ve come forward with a plan that would get us more money. I look forward to working with Chuck Schumer. I would be a vigorous proponent of what we need.

Source: Senate debate in Manhattan Oct 8, 2000

New Yorkers are diverse, big dreamers

Q: Define a New Yorker.

CLINTON: What it means to be a New Yorker is to be the best human being you can be, to do the best with your life you can do, to dream the biggest dreams, to demonstrate that we can make this wonderful patchwork quilt of a place not only work but show the rest of the world that people from different backgrounds and experiences not only can get along but build a better future.

Source: Senate debate in Manhattan Oct 8, 2000

New to the neighborhood, but not new to NY issues

For over 30 years in many different ways, I’ve seen first hand the kinds of challenges New Yorkers face today. I may be new to the neighborhood, but I am not new to your concerns. I care about the same issues you care about. I understand them. I know that we can make progress on them. That’s why my friend, I want to be your Senator.
Source: Announcement Speech, SUNY Purchase Feb 6, 2000

Opposed numerous Bush cabinet & court appointees

The loudest segment of the Democratic Party consistently opposes Pres. Bush’s nominees to the courts and to cabinet positions. Here’s a list of nominations that Clinton opposed and some of her statements against the candidates:
Source: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy, by Amanda Carpenter, p. 90-94 Oct 11, 2006

Decried 1980s materialism & excesses of corporate America

In 1987, Hillary expressed a fervent concern that corporate America was running amok and subverting bedrock American values. She cited a rogue’s gallery of corporate raiders--Ivan Boesky, Carl Icahn, and T. Boone Pickens--and bemoaned environmental degradation caused by companies [such as at] Three Mile Island and Love Canal. Foreshadowing her later fascination with “the politics of meaning,” she talked about the excesses of yuppie materialism, hyper-individualism, and narcissism that were overshadowing concern for the public good.
“We are experiencing a crisis of meaning and a spiritual crisis,” she said, describing “the hurt, emptiness, confusion, and loss of meaning that characterize much of our society.” She wound up laying primary blame at the doorstep of corporate America. Its obsession with short-term profit was a major source of the subversion of democratic, family, moral, and spiritual values in America.
Source: Hillary’s Choice by Gail Sheehy, p.173 Dec 9, 1999

I thought Bill was a pretty good president; now I’m running

Q: If you are the nominee, it will be 28 years, from 1980 to 2008, where there’s been a Bush or a Clinton on the national ticket. Is it healthy for democracy to have a two-family political dynasty?

A: I thought Bill was a pretty good president. And from my perspective, you know, the values that he acted on, on behalf of our country, both at home and abroad, are ones that stand the test of time. But look, I’m running on my own. I’m going to the people on my own. I think I know how to find common ground and how to stand my ground. And on all the issues that matter to America in the 21st century, I wish we could turn the clock back, but we can’t. And we need to start with leadership that can deliver results and get us back to the values that make America great.

Source: 2007 Democratic primary debate at Dartmouth College Sep 6, 2007

1992: Keep press on the issues, not on personal destruction

By the time of the New Hampshire primary in March, 1992, Hillary’s view of the vast right-wing conspiracy was taking more precise shape, for good reason.

Hillary’s had acuity of judgment that George Bush would be reelected unless the Clinton campaign could find a way to repel attacks and keep the attack machine silenced long enough to effectively trumpet the Clintons’ substantive message. Getting the public to listen to anything Bill said would be difficult because of what the press had become. Hillary saw the press as out of control, hell-bent on personal destruction and manufactured controversy, while ignoring serious issues.

The big story of the campaign, she feared, would was going to be Bill’s private life and hers, and a grotesque distortion of the Arkansas years. It is apparent in interview after interview that the guiding premise was: Keep them away from us and our private lives.

Source: A Woman in Charge, by Carl Bernstein, p.198-199 Jun 5, 2007

Could have weakened right wing conspiracy by honest answers

Hillary was not wrong that old enemies in Arkansas, in conjunction with organized rightwing groups & talk radio, were hard at work. The unprecedented campaign against a sitting president & first lady, well organized and increasingly effective, continued.

New and old enemies viewed “Clintonism” as a plague to be eradicated. Citizens United was an organization set up to fight the Clintons. They issued a constant stream of lies, half-truths, and conspiratorial epistles that told a tale of perdition & evil and were peddled to mainstream news organizations, Republicans on Capital Hill and right-wing talk show hosts.

But however accurate Hillary’s perception of an organized threat against the Clintons, she seemed unable or unwilling to grasp the desire of less antagonistic citizens, members of Congress, and the press to be given straightforward, timely responses to legitimate questions being raised by the stories, whatever the origins of the information & the motivations of those promoting them.

Source: A Woman in Charge, by Carl Bernstein, p.365-366 Jun 5, 2007

Meant “women work conflict” with “stay home & bake cookies”

A reporter asked whether I could have avoided an appearance of conflict of interest when my husband was Governor. I said, “You know, I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas, but what I decided to do was fulfill my profession, which I entered before my husband was in public life. And I have worked very hard to be as careful as possible.”

I could have said, “Look, short of abandoning my law firm partnership and staying home, there was nothing more I could have done to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest.“

My aides suggested that I talk to reporters a second time. On the spot, I had a press conference. It had little effect. Thirteen minutes after I answered the question, a story ran on the AP wire. CNN quickly aired one too.

It turned into a story about my alleged callousness towards stay-at-home-mothers. Republicans labeled me the ”ideological leader of a Clinton-Clinton Administration that would push a radical-feminist agenda.“

Source: Living History, by Hillary Clinton, p.109-110 Nov 1, 2003

Not involved in pardons, neither with husband nor brother

Sen. Clinton said she was disappointed after learning her brother had been paid to help two convicts win clemency from her husband, former President Bill Clinton. Clinton said she had no knowledge that her brother Hugh Rodham had been paid almost $400,000 for legal work for two applicants for presidential clemency, Carlos Vignali and Almon Braswell.

Although she demanded he return the money, Clinton said she has not spoken with her brother at all since the news broke. “I knew nothing about my brother’s involvement in these pardons,“ she said. ”I love my brother, but. I’m very disappointed and I’m very disturbed.“ Rodham’s lawyer said he had returned most of the fees to both clemency clients. She added that she had no role in any of her husband’s 11th-hour pardons.

The disclosures opened up a new area for congressional investigators, who were already looking into a controversy over former President Clinton’s pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich and his business partner.

Source: Kate Snow & Eileen O’Connor, CNN.com Feb 22, 2001

We’re better off than 1992; elect Gore & continue progress

We’re a stronger, better country than we were in 1992. When Bill, Al, Tipper and I got on that bus after our convention eight years ago, we began a journey that took us through America’s heartland. Along the way we saw faces of hope -- but also faces of despair -- fathers out of work, mothers trapped on welfare, children with unmet medical needs. How can we continue America’s progress? By electing Al Gore and Joe Lieberman!
Source: Address to the Democratic National Convention Aug 14, 2000

1986: Prepped Bill's race; denied her own political ambition

Hillary Clinton was asked in 1986 if she had any plans of her own for political races any time in the future. She said that she had no personal political ambitions. "I'll let Bill do that. I value being a private person too much," she told the Gazette. What she didn't say was that Bill Clinton was considering running for president. It was the dream of his lifetime.

The preliminary campaign machinery was set in place. Phone calls were made, advisers considered. Hillary braced herself for what she knew would be a messy race. She braced Chelsea. She was excited. Though. She was going to have a shot at being first lady of the nation.

A press conference was called in Little Rock for July 15, 1987. All indications were that Bill Clinton was about to announce his candidacy for the presidency.

Source: The Inside Story, by Judith Warner, p. 142-3 Aug 1, 1993

1992: All marriages have issues; our issues are our business

On Jan. 18, at a campaign rally, when someone had asked her if her marital fidelity should be a campaign issue, she had faced the crowd, Bill by her side, and responded, "In any marriage, there are issues that come up between two people who are married that I think are their business." The crowd applauded almost half a minute. "From my perspective," she said, "our marriage is a strong marriage. We love each other, support each other, and we had had a lot of strong and important experiences together tha have meant a lot to us." She was proud of her family, Hillary said, and added in conclusion that she thought that what should matter to New Hampshire residents was how their own families were doing. The barb was met with uproarious applause. Clearly the public taste for Gary Hart scandals in a recession year was less than the Republicans might have hoped for.

On Jan. 26, "I have acknowledged wrongdoing," the governor offered to the camera. "I have acknowledged causing pain to my marriage."

Source: The Inside Story, by Judith Warner, p. 169-70 Aug 1, 1993

Not some little woman standing by her man

I’m not sitting here like some little woman standing by her man like Tammy Wynette. I’m sitting here because I love him and I honor what he’s been through and what we’ve been through together. If that’s not enough for people, then, heck, don’t vote for him.
Source: Unique Voice, p. 47: Campaign speech Jul 2, 1992

After 35 years of experience, ready to lead on day one

Q: [to Kucinich] What do you have that Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama do not have?

KUCINICH: The new doctrine that I’m going to promote throughout this campaign is that we’ll use the science of human relations and diplomacy to settle your differences without committing the young men and women to war, unless it’s absolutely necessary.

CLINTON: We are united for change. We cannot take another four or eight years of Republican leadership that has been so disastrous for our country. The issue is: Which of us is ready to lead on day one? I have 35 years of being an instrument and agent of change, before I was ever a public official. And during the time that I’ve been privileged to serve as first lady and now as senator, I’ve worked to bring people together, to find common ground where we can, and then to stand our ground where we can’t.

OBAMA: We don’t just need a change in political parties in Washington. We’ve got to have a change in attitudes of those who are representing the people.

Source: 2007 YouTube Democratic Primary debate, Charleston SC Jul 23, 2007

Amalgam politics: make labels irrelevant

Hillary insisted that she could not be placed in a box politically or ideologically: “My politics are a real mixture,” Hillary explained. “An amalgam. Nobody’s ever stopped to ask me or try to figure out the new sense of politics that Bill & a lot of us are trying to create. The labels are irrelevant.”

To a degree her plea was valid, but it was also disingenuous, as she could have candidly admitted that she was not a conservative Republican. This trend would continue throughout Hillary’s career, as she consistently lunged for the rhetorical middle and tried to frame herself as a moderate.

When it is suggested that she sounds as though she’s trying to come up with a sort of unified-field theory of life, she says, excitedly, “That’s right, that’s exactly right!” The First Lady was seeking a way to marry conservatism and liberalism, capitalism and state-ism, to join together the myriad state, religious, social, economic, and class problems into one idea that could be addressed by her theory.

Source: God and Hillary Clinton, by Paul Kengor, p.109-111 Jul 18, 2007

Campaigning on strong coalition of women & minorities

Hillary’s nomination as the first woman candidate for president by a major political party would generate extraordinary excitement and give the Democrats an undeniable advantage in the general election.

Consider this: If Hillary is nominated as the first woman ever to run for president, she is very, very likely to win. By maximizing her support among the 54% of the vote that is cast by women--and tapping into the enthusiasm that her husband elicits among African Americans and Hispanics--she is likely to sweep into office, easily defeating any conventional white male candidate the Republicans might send against her.

The Democratic Party cannot win without fully tapping all three pillars of its base: African Americans, Hispanics, and white women. A Hillary Clinton candidacy is particularly strong because of her appeal to all three bastions of Democratic power.

Source: Condi vs. Hillary, by Dick Morris, p. 5 & 52 Oct 11, 2005

Accepted draft for Senate to avoid being “derivative spouse”

Hillary said, “For years, I have written legal briefs, I have given speeches, I have lobbied Congress. I have been standing on the outside, knocking on the door, while they set policy and pass laws. I’d like to be on the inside making the case.”

Why choose New York? Hillary confided that she’d investigated “some other states, but they have a number of qualified people running who had worked hard and long to be congressional candidates.”

Hillary said that the other thing that was appealing about a Senate run was that it would be a rare thing in American politics--a candidacy by acclamation. “I’m being drafted. It is so rare to be drafted in this way. the nature of politics is such that you have to seize the moment when and if it comes, or it may never come again.” She wanted to be wanted.

Source: Her Way, by Jeff Gerth & Don Van Natta, p.208 Jun 8, 2007

Running for re-election with no promise to serve a full term

Q: In 2000, you promised to serve a full 6-year term. Will you make the same promise today?

CLINTON: I am running for re-election. I have made no decisions about any future plans. If that’s a concern for any voter, they should factor that into their decision on Nov. 7. We need a new direction, and that’s what I’m going to focus on.

Q: So you can’t make that promise then today?

CLINTON: I’m not looking past this election. But I’m going to be very clear with the voters, I can’t make a decision now, but if that concerns any voter, they should factor that in.

Q: Are you saying don’t vote for you if that’s a concern?

CLINTON: No, I think they should vote for me, but they should balance that against everything that I’ve done, my record and my values.

SPENCER: I’m the only one standing here today that wants to be a US Senator for the next 6 years for the people of New York. I commit that I am not running for President and I will serve for 6 years.

Source: NY 2006 Senate Debate, moderated by Bill Ritter Oct 22, 2006

No problems with presidential transition; resolved by Xmas

First lady and U.S. Senator-elect Hillary Rodham Clinton predicted Wednesday that the presidential election would be resolved before Christmas if legal challenges over Florida’s disputed votes are handled in an “expeditious manner.”

“I think both campaigns have filed legal actions and we have the time to have those heard,” said Clinton, who endorsed Gore’s position in the dispute. “I believe that it certainly is important that every American have the confidence that his or her vote is counted and certainly in Florida there are questions about votes that haven’t been counted. I think those should be resolved,“ she said.

America’s government institutions, including the presidency, are ”strong and resilient“ enough to weather the current dispute, Clinton said. She added that Gore as well as his Republican rival, Texas Gov. George W. Bush, would ”certainly be able to hit the ground running“ after taking office.

Source: CNN.com Nov 29, 2000

Rejected Independence Party; they include Pat Buchanan

CLINTON [to Lazio]: When the Independence Party was considering who to nominate, I made it very clear that I would not run on a party line with Pat Buchanan because of his anti-Semitic comments. You were more than happy to accept that particular line.

LAZIO: Mrs. Clinton, that’s not totally accurate. Your people were up there working hard for that.

CLINTON: I’ve specifically said publicly that I wouldn’t take it if they nominated Pat Buchanan. It was up to them to decide what to do.

LAZIO: I condemned him and the fact that he has been intolerant.

CLINTON: You know, I can only respond because, you know, as The Forward said when they endorsed me, Jewish voters should reject smear campaigns and inaccurate information.

Q: Did you accept the Independence nomination?

LAZIO: No.

CLINTON: That’s because it wasn’t offered.

LAZIO: No. It wasn’t offered to either one of us, to be fair about that.

Source: NY Senate debate on NBC Oct 28, 2000

Lazio’s a nice young man, but it’s about policy differences

Q: You would think that you dislike each other. Is that true?

LAZIO: It’s not a matter of personal dislike, [but] to point at the differences between candidates and the philosophy between two candidates.

Q: Do you dislike him?

CLINTON: No. I think that I have no personal animus at all toward Mr. Lazio. He seems like a very nice person.

Q: Well, name three things that you like about him.

CLINTON: Well, it seems like he has a very nice family. And that he has worked very hard. And that he’s an attractive young man.

Q: And you name three things you like about her.

LAZIO: Well, I think you’re an attractive woman. And I think you’ve got a very nice family. I’m sure you’re a very good mother as well.

CLINTON: Thank you very much. But that’s not what this election’s about. And what it is about are the very significant differences between us on everything like education and health care and the economy and the environment and guns and choice and Social Security and the budget surplus.

Source: NY Senate debate on NBC Oct 28, 2000

Hillary: Lazio has chutzpah to call himself “mainstream”

CLINTON: Listening to the congressman’s response, reminds me of a word I’ve heard a lot of this past year: chutzpah. He stands here and tells us that he’s a moderate, mainstream, independent member of Congress. Well, in fact he was a deputy whip to Newt Gingrich. He voted to shut the government down. He voted to cut $270 billion from Medicare. He voted for the biggest education cuts in our history. Time and time again when he’s had a choice to make, particularly at the critical turning point, when our country was really on the line with Newt Gingrich’s Contract With America, he stood with the Republican leadership and Newt Gingrich.

LAZIO: Mrs. Clinton’s last remark has to redefine the word chutzpah. Mrs. Clinton, you, of all people, shouldn’t try to make guilt by association. Newt Gingrich isn’t running in this race, I’m running in this race. Let’s talk about my record. Let’s lower taxes. Let’s deregulate energy. And let’s build on my work in Congress already to get the job done.

Source: Clinton-Lazio debate, Buffalo NY Sep 13, 2000

Support minimum wage & more teachers, in Senate or out

Hillary Rodham Clinton said she would “probably be connected with a foundation or academic institution in some way” if she loses her bid to be elected US senator from New York. “I’ll support the same issues -- raising the minimum wage, expanding the earned income tax credit for poor working people, and putting more teachers in the classroom to lower class size in our public schools,” she said in the interview in Ladies Home Journal.When asked what accomplishments she’s most proud of as first lady, Mrs. Clinton noted her involvement in extending health care to children, making it easier for people who lose or change jobs to keep their health insurance, and speeding up and providing tax incentives for the adoption and foster care systems.
Source: CNN.com May 3, 2000

End divisional politics

I will fight against the division politics of revenge and retribution. If you put me to work for you, I will work to lift people up, not put them down.
Source: Announcement Speech, SUNY Purchase Feb 6, 2000

1988: Felt Dukakis "set up" failure of Bill's DNC speech

Bill Clinton's summer of discontent came in 1988, at the Democratic National Convention in Atlanta. He landed the job of introducing the candidate for President, Michael Dukakis.

It was a wonderful opportunity. But what we saw was the potential derailment of a brilliant career. A speech that was supposed to last 15 minutes droned on for 32 minutes. Bill Clinton was finally booed off the stage.

When Hillary and Bill got home to Little Rock, Vince and I took her to lunch. She was livid. She fel the Dukakis staff had "set Bill up." First, before the speech, Bill had shown a copy to Dukakis. It was too long, Bill told him, but Dukakis insisted that he leave it all in. Second, the normal dimming of lights to warn the audience that someone was abou to speak didn't occur.

I later heard from someone who was there that Dukakis's staff was worried about the nominee being overshadowed by Clinton.

Fortunately, Bill headed off the crisis by poking fun at himself on Johnny Carson's Tonight Show.

Source: Friends in High Places, by Webb Hubbell, p.144-145 Nov 1, 1997

1992: Press questioned Rose Law Firm about Hillary

Hillary visited the Rose Law Firm office very seldom during the 1992 campaign season, though the campaign hadn't really geared up yet. Once she called from the road and got both Vince and me on the phone. She told us that there would be press inquiries about her work with the Rose firm, and she wanted to make sure the calls were handled responsibly, with sound judgment. Vince and I persuaded the firm that all press inquiries about Hillary would go through either Vince or me.

Sure enough, we started fielding calls immediately. People wanted to know if she was a "real lawyer." People had heard that she, Vince, and I had tried to take over the firm. Then, just before the New Hampshire primary, in one day the storied took on a nasty tone. A lounge singer named Gennifer Flowers was about to go public with a claim that she'd had a long-term affair with Bill Clinton. The phones really started ringing once that story had been leaked.

Source: Friends in High Places, by Webb Hubbell, p.157 Nov 1, 1997

Has a Jewish step-grandfather

Dorothy’s mother was only 15 when Dorothy was born. Dorothy and her sister were sent to live with their father’s parents. After graduation from high school, Dorothy returned to Chicago because of the marriage of her mother to Max Rosenberg. He was well-to-do and was involved in the hotel business. Rosenberg persuaded Della to send for her children and try and make amends for the past. It was the first time in ten years that Dorothy had been contacted by her mother.

The role of Rosenberg in the life of Hillary has always been clouded. The first time Hillary mentioned her step grandfather publicly was in 1999, during her Senate campaign in NY. “I have nothing but fond memories of Max Rosenberg,” Hillary said. In Living History she wrote only that he was Jewish.

Source: A Woman in Charge, by Carl Bernstein, p. 23-24 Jun 5, 2007

At age 27, tried to enlist in Marines

[In the 1970s] she tried to enlist in the United States Marine Corps. At the time, it was considered a preposterous thing for a young woman to do, but both Clintons have a penchant for grandstanding. Sometimes it works. “So I walked into our local recruiting office,” Hillary said, “and the person who happened to be there could not have been older than 21. I didn’t know whether I thought active duty would be a good idea. He finally said to me, ‘You’re too old. You can’t see. And you’re a woman.’”
Source: Madame Hillary, by R. Emmett Tyrell, p. 3 Feb 25, 2004

Mother, Dorothy, offended by mistreatment of any human being

My mother, Dorothy Rodham, loved her home and her family, but she felt limited by the narrow choices of her life. It is easy to forget now, when women’s choices can seem overwhelming, how few there were for my mother’s generation. She started taking college courses when we were older. She never graduated, but she amassed mountains of credits in subjects ranging from logic to child development.

My mother was offended by the mistreatment of any human being, especially children. She understood from personal experience that many children--through no fault of their own--were disadvantaged. and discriminated against from birth. She hated self-righteousness and pretensions of moral superiority and impressed on my brothers and me that we were no better or worse than anyone else. As a child in California, she had watched the Japanese Americans in her school endure blatant discrimination and daily taunts from the Anglo students.

Source: Living History, by Hillary Clinton, p. 10-11 Nov 1, 2003

Father, Hugh, focused on self-reliance & personal initiative

I grew up between the push & tug of my parents’ values and my own political beliefs reflect both. The gender gap started in families like mine. My mother was basically a Democrat, although she kept it quiet in Republican Park Ridge. My dad, Hugh Rodham, was a rock-ribbed, up-by-your-bootstraps, conservative Republican and proud of it. He was also tight-fisted with money. He did not believe in credit and he ran his business on a strict pay-as-you=go policy. His ideology was based on self-reliance and personal initiative, but unlike many people who call themselves conservatives today, he understood the importance of fiscal responsibility and supported taxpayer investments in highways, schools, parks, and other important public goods.

My father could not stand waste. Like so many who grew up in the Depression, his fear of poverty colored his life. To this day, I put uneaten olives back in the jar, wrap up the tiniest pieces of cheese and feel guilty when I throw anything away.

Source: Living History, by Hillary Clinton, p. 11 Nov 1, 2003

OpEd: "Crisis of meaning" is unified-field theory of life

In 1969, at Wellesley, Hillary Rodham mused about a "politics of meaning." 24 years later, however, speaking at U. Texas, Hillary Clinton said that "remolding society certainly in the West is one of the great challenges facing all of us." She mentioned alienation, despair, and hopelessness, and said we are "in a crisis of meaning." She called for "a new politics of meaning"; she wanted "a society that fills us up again and makes us feel that we are part of something bigger than ourselves."

Nobody kne what that sort of blather meant in the Sixties and nobody knows now. We do know what it is about, however; it is about self and the attempt to give life meaning through the quest for a vaguely imagined utopia.

One journalist agrees that she is searchin for a "unified-field theory of life." Her Wellesley and Texas speeches share all the same traits: vaulting ambition; didactic moralizing; intellectual incoherence; and the assumption that only your guiding hand can create the glorious future.

Source: Slouching Towards Gomorrah, by Robert Bork, p. 87 May 31, 1996

1970s: Editorial board of Yale Review of Law & Social Action

At Yale Law School, Hillary was on the editorial board of the now defunct Yale Review of Law and Social Action, an alternative legal journal that was dedicated, as its editors stated, "to combine scholarship with reflections and recommendations based on experience & practice." The journal aimed to provide a forum for activists and community leaders as well as scholars. Its first issue featured a cover photo of national guardsmen in riot gear; its second was devoted largely to the Black Panthers
Source: The Inside Story, by Judith Warner, p. 46 Aug 1, 1993

1960s: Rejected as applicant to NASA; women not allowed

Although home, and her parents' gentle nudging, gave Hillary a sense of unlimited possibility, the outside world wasn't quite so encouraging. While she was still in junior high school, she decided she wanted to be an astronaut. It was the early 1960s and the nation, under President Kennedy's leadership, was thinking moonwards. Hillary wrote to NASA and asked them what she needed to do to start training. She included some mention of her background and academic strengths. NASA wrote back telling her that girls need not apply. It was, she said, "infuriating." She told the Washington Post: "I later realized that I couldn't have been an astronaut anyway, because I have such terrible eyesight. That somewhat placated me."
Source: The Inside Story, by Judith Warner, p. 15 Aug 1, 1993

Other candidates on Principles & Values: Hillary Clinton on other issues:
Incumbents:
Pres.Barack Obama
V.P.Joe Biden
2016 Democratic Candidates:
Secy.Hillary Clinton(NY)
Gov.Andrew Cuomo(NY)
Mayor Rahm Emanuel(IL)
Gov.Martin O`Malley(MD)
Gov.Deval Patrick(MA)
2016 GOP Candidates:
Amb.John Bolton(MD)
Gov.Jeb Bush(FL)
Dr.Ben Carson(MD)
Gov.Chris Christie(NJ)
Sen.Ted Cruz(TX)
Gov.Mike Huckabee(AR)
Gov.Jon Huntsman(UT)
Gov.Bobby Jindal(LA)
Rep.Peter King(NY)
Gov.Sarah Palin(AK)
Sen.Rand Paul(KY)
Gov.Rick Perry(TX)
Sen.Rob Portman(OH)
Secy.Condi Rice(CA)
Sen.Marco Rubio(FL)
Rep.Paul Ryan(WI)
Sen.Rick Santorum(PA)
Donald Trump(NY)
2016 Third Party Candidates:
Mayor Michael Bloomberg(I-NYC)
Gov.Gary Johnson(L-NM)
Gov.Jesse Ventura(I-MN)
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families/Children
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Infrastructure/Technology
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty

Page last updated: Mar 19, 2014