![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| 2008 Election: | McCain's book | Obama's book | Biden's book | Palin's booklet | Keyes' book | Nader's book | Barr's book | 2008 Debates |
2010 Massachusetts Senate Debate among Martha Coakley (Democrat); Scott Brown (Republican); and Joe L. Kennedy (Libertarian) ![]() Normally, Massachusetts has two safe Democratic Senate seats. But with a recession in full swing, and voters anxious for change, 2009-2010 is not a normal year. Republican State Senator Scott Brown has surged in the polls as the Jan. 19 special election date approaches, and even her own internal polls show Democratic Attorney General Martha Coakley slightly behind. The stakes in this race are high because it occurs just as the final votes on healthcare reform approach. Brown has described himself as "the 41st vote" to block the current filibuster-proof Democratic majority, and Coakley has described herself as "the 60th vote" to ensure passage of healthcare reform. The special election is viewed nationwide partly as a referendum o healthcare and partly as a bellwether of the November 2010 general election. Hence Massachusetts voters have been flooded in the final weeks of the campaign withj TV and radio commercials, plus emails and robo-calls and live appearances from everyone from Rudy Giuliani to Barack Obama. As a Massachusetts voter, I see Brown as having succeeded at capturing the energy of a "change candidate" and gaining momentum at the right time to win the election. As a political activist, I dream of doing exactly that in every election. Even if Brown loses, the Republican Party can justifiably claim victory in having run a serious conservative campaign in one of the nation's most liberal states. Republicans will use this race to imply, appropriately, that the electorate nationwide feels that on healthcare reform they are not being listened to. And the Republicans will attempt to parlay this race to a Congressional victory in November 2010. However, it is still very likely that the Democrats will eke out an electoral victory, and get the 60th vote in the Senate, for now. I make this prediction based on my own experience with the "political machine" of the Massachusetts Democratic Party, and in particular, the "Menino Machine" run by Boston's Mayor Tom Menino. Menino's machine is formidable -- it has cost myself and my progressive colleagues election after election, even when we were ahead in the polls, and even when we seemed to have won on Election Day itself. Menino turns out voters by the thousands, and they are mostly voters who don't show up in polls -- new Russian-speaking immigrants in Brighton, for example, who are incapable of responding to pollsters questions but who are very capable of voting. Boston itself accounts for about 10% of the Massachusetts electorate, and Menino controls a very large majority of that vote. And of course, the rest of the state has other political machines too, ranging from other big-city mayors to unions who routinely produce election-day workers and voters, almost all on the Democratic side. The mantra for special elections is that they are determined by "GOTV", or Get-Out-The-Vote efforts. That is especially true for elections during winter, and even more so in bad weather, which is likely in mid-January in Massachusetts. The Democratic machine is overwhelmingly stronger at GOTV than anything Scott Brown can put together. Hence even though the polls show Brown ahead by 1% to 5%, that's really not enough to win. While we predict a narrow Coakley victory, we will make a contingent prediction also, in case Brown wins. If Brown should surge in the final days to a 10% lead in the polls, and hence eke out a narrow victory himself by overcoming the Democratic machine advantage, we predict that Brown will not be seated in the Senate until after the healthcare vote is concluded. The Coleman-Franken race demonstrated that holding up election certification is an easy task for clever lawyers, especially when the stakes are high (the stakes are the same for Brown-Coakley as for Franken-Coleman: the 60th seat in the Senate majority!). All of the Massachusetts statewide certifying entities -- and many of the local entities -- are run by Democrats -- and they are well aware of the issues in the U.S. Senate without being told what to do. If Brown wins, count on a legal challenge that will delay his being seated for a week or two, or however long it takes until Obama signs the healthcare reform bill. -- Jesse Gordon, editor-in-chief, OnTheIssues.org, Jan. 17, 2010
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||